[SOURCE] Olympia Labs

That was already addressed by other members/mods of SST in a much more professional and concise manner. Feel free to fuck off, something about you doesn’t sit right reading your posts on SST and your all but outright endorsement of a source, as a moderator.

Yikes.
 
boy, my neighbor's girlfriend is so smokin hot. perfect little playground of a bod, the most scrumptious ass ive seen in a long time. so hot..sooooo hohhhttttt....and so young. and im so old. and its driving me godam crazy, my ass fetish is being tortured so badly. i want my face in that ass like crazy. and her sister s almost as hot. just as young, too. if i was 30 years younger....i miss my 20's.
Not sure this was meant for here, but regardless - I have it in for a girl who is 16 years younger than me. I wish I was either 10 years younger or she was 5 years older.
 
Hey Best Friend! I'm glad you admitted that. I love all the fun names you're coming up with. Cute Stuff.

No one at SST has made an attempt to take credit for W&M outing OL. As I said before on SST - Kim alerted us and we are thankful for that. If nothing else I think we can all agree its a net benefit to everyone with this dude out of the picture because we all want the same thing : reliability and safety.

What’s up buddy? Glad you’re here. Ok elephant in the room stuff. Read some of the threads here in the Underground. You won’t see many “G2G” or [emoji91][emoji91][emoji91] reviews. We don’t do that here and we hammer the guys that do. Why? Because ALL UGLs no matter how great they may seem could turn out to be bad. They could be intentional scammers. They could be bad brewers. They could get bad raws. Whatever the case, if they crash and burn that glowing dickrider review is associated with your handle and reputation here forever.

So we’re over here holding Olympia’s ass to the fire DEMANDING that he gets his shit tested and you’re over there writing a review about his snazzy labels and T/A? See how those seem to conflict. Incidentally, we told him not to have the “Rx” on the labels for obvious reasons and he said he was going to trash those and get new ones.

You’re a mod too. It’s your board. Guys that have been doing this for a while can see past your review and it doesn’t sway them. But new guys, whether signed up or lurking, see that review and jump on the order. Hell, we have shills and gear whores here that write reviews for these new shit UGLs. We hammer them too because that’s bullshit that undermines our vetting. Do your board a service and word your reviews more carefully, knowing that there is new guys looking up to you. Their enthusiasm far outweighs their ability to make a rational decision. We all remember that buzzy feeling we had getting our first pack.

If you can see some of my points then I’m sure we can get along. If you’re going to get defensive and stubborn then go back to the SST and continue what you’re doing.

Please consider changing the formatting though so that hitting the “reply” doesn’t insert the entire thread string!! That’s maddening!
 
What’s up buddy? Glad you’re here. Ok elephant in the room stuff. Read some of the threads here in the Underground. You won’t see many “G2G” or [emoji91][emoji91][emoji91] reviews. We don’t do that here and we hammer the guys that do. Why? Because ALL UGLs no matter how great they may seem could turn out to be bad. They could be intentional scammers. They could be bad brewers. They could get bad raws. Whatever the case, if they crash and burn that glowing dickrider review is associated with your handle and reputation here forever.

So we’re over here holding Olympia’s ass to the fire DEMANDING that he gets his shit tested and you’re over there writing a review about his snazzy labels and T/A? See how those seem to conflict. Incidentally, we told him not to have the “Rx” on the labels for obvious reasons and he said he was going to trash those and get new ones.

You’re a mod too. It’s your board. Guys that have been doing this for a while can see past your review and it doesn’t sway them. But new guys, whether signed up or lurking, see that review and jump on the order. Hell, we have shills and gear whores here that write reviews for these new shit UGLs. We hammer them too because that’s bullshit that undermines our vetting. Do your board a service and word your reviews more carefully, knowing that there is new guys looking up to you. Their enthusiasm far outweighs their ability to make a rational decision. We all remember that buzzy feeling we had getting our first pack.

If you can see some of my points then I’m sure we can get along. If you’re going to get defensive and stubborn then go back to the SST and continue what you’re doing.

Please consider changing the formatting though so that hitting the “reply” doesn’t insert the entire thread string!! That’s maddening!
You’re either bold or a glutton for punishment to come back for more after that verbal annihilation you received! :rolleyes:
 
You’re either bold or a glutton for punishment to come back for more after that verbal annihilation you received! :rolleyes:

I’m either a glutton or I’m just stupid.

I don’t even know why I do this. I could keep quiet and enjoy the good source that I have.

I guess I feel for the new guys that dive in head first and learn their lessons the hard way.

At least testing has become a main requirement of these shitbag sources. That has been a big help in weeding out the scammers.
 
Coming from the guy who said "you won't be disappointed" with OL :rolleyes:

Yeah--several weeks before we knew this and I immediately banned his account and removed his page while informing users. If that's all you can say about the situation that speaks volumes my man.

So you told people that this shitshow of a source was good-to-go based on shiny labels, but people should ignore that fact because you banned him once it came out that his gear was shit?

The fact remains that you, a moderator, jumped the gun in giving a source two thumbs up. That shows poor judgment on your part.
 
So you told people that this shitshow of a source was good-to-go based on shiny labels, but people should ignore that fact because you banned him once it came out that his gear was shit?

The fact remains that you, a moderator, jumped the gun in giving a source two thumbs up. That shows poor judgment on your part.
And should have ZERO CREDIBILITY from here on out do to that fact. But meso is the “shit show” lol. Ok. @BluesecSST just take your shilling free gear getting ass back over there. We don’t want shills like yourself who are mods I might add over here sucking source cock and getting people hurt or scammed. Thanks for playing though ;)
 
What’s up buddy? Glad you’re here. Ok elephant in the room stuff. Read some of the threads here in the Underground. You won’t see many “G2G” or [emoji91][emoji91][emoji91] reviews. We don’t do that here and we hammer the guys that do. Why? Because ALL UGLs no matter how great they may seem could turn out to be bad. They could be intentional scammers. They could be bad brewers. They could get bad raws. Whatever the case, if they crash and burn that glowing dickrider review is associated with your handle and reputation here forever.

So we’re over here holding Olympia’s ass to the fire DEMANDING that he gets his shit tested and you’re over there writing a review about his snazzy labels and T/A? See how those seem to conflict. Incidentally, we told him not to have the “Rx” on the labels for obvious reasons and he said he was going to trash those and get new ones.

You’re a mod too. It’s your board. Guys that have been doing this for a while can see past your review and it doesn’t sway them. But new guys, whether signed up or lurking, see that review and jump on the order. Hell, we have shills and gear whores here that write reviews for these new shit UGLs. We hammer them too because that’s bullshit that undermines our vetting. Do your board a service and word your reviews more carefully, knowing that there is new guys looking up to you. Their enthusiasm far outweighs their ability to make a rational decision. We all remember that buzzy feeling we had getting our first pack.

If you can see some of my points then I’m sure we can get along. If you’re going to get defensive and stubborn then go back to the SST and continue what you’re doing.

Please consider changing the formatting though so that hitting the “reply” doesn’t insert the entire thread string!! That’s maddening!

I'm no shill. You can check my post history. It was the first and last time I'll be doing anything remotely like that. It was a mild fuck-up, plain and simple and all anyone can do is learn from it.

As I said : no good deed goes unpunished and it would seem that you keep using the words "stellar" "glowing" etc for what I said. That's your prerogative and while I don't agree with it your other points are reasonable and have merit. Appreciate it.

Edit : Yeah the reply thing is pretty annoying. Just haven't gotten around to it yet.
 
Last edited:
I'm no shill. You can check my post history. It was the first and last time I'll be doing anything remotely like that. It was a mild fuck-up, plain and simple and all anyone can do is learn from it.

As I said : no good deed goes unpunished and it would seem that you keep using the words "stellar" "glowing" etc for what I said. That's your prerogative and while I don't agree with it your other points are reasonable and have merit. Appreciate it.

Edit : Yeah the reply thing is pretty annoying. Just haven't gotten around to it yet.

This is way better than what you posted on your own board. I can get behind this. Welcome to MESO.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top