AlexDavis43
Member
Easy to ask for things to be done when it isn't out of your own pocket.
This. To my knowledge, he still hasn't sent anything for the proposed testing.
Like, not even 1 vial.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Easy to ask for things to be done when it isn't out of your own pocket.
Particles that get filtered out. Let's say there are some heavy metals too. What percentage of that would be heavy metals and how dangerous would it be.The elephant in the room remains: where's the evidence of harm from these impurities (eg, the 2% in something that tested at 98%)?
We've been using gear for decades.
Particles that get filtered out. Let's say there are some heavy metals too. What percentage of that would be heavy metals and how dangerous would it be.
1-2 gram of gear a week. 2% is heavy metals... assuming you get good quality oils/solvents.
Too big for that. We would have been buddies LOL. Only way people can get away with that stuff is online. Easy to be/talk tough on the internet.How did you make it through grade school without being stuffed in a locker
Crazy thing is I was recently thinking this was your alt accountA face of the movement emerges...
Smart but not a smartass? Check
Gets it? Check
Uses UGL products? Check
Great communicator? Check
Seeks to understand? Check
Cool username? Check
Simply excellent how you framed that @lift4lyfe . Well done and thank you.
Can't wait to hear the answers to those questions you posed. Cuts straight to the matter.
Thank you for an excellent question. Really important concept.Ok @readalot i have an actual question. You may have addressed this previously and may not have. I haven’t read every post here in your thread. I mean hell…….1/3 of them are just calling you a cunt anyway.
I understand the reasoning of testing the raws vs just the finished oils. My question is this……
Impurities or contaminants or heavy metals that may be found in raws…….what if any methodologies or processes are available to ugls to remove them? Or even reduce them to “safe” levels?
The kind of testing you propose would identify and (I hope) quantify the impurities. But is there a real actionable process to remove them?
Or is the only solution “go find better raws”?
Thank you again for taking the time to write that out. Well done!amount of detected compound compared to the standard / weighted amount of the sample
Of course, proper separation with orthogonal confirmation is a must.
It should be noticed the usual way the Chinese QA/QC places, or MZ Biolabs take is to calculate purity from peak area %, which is called area normalization and it is suitable only in very specific scenarios and in general is not a proper way to do it. It's cheap, fast and allows those places to be good results pill mill, but the proper way is to calculate purity from
amount of detected compound compared to the standard / weighted amount of the sample.
Oh no no, nothing like that. It can easily range up to 95%. Normalisation used incorrectly can yield 100% pure result with something that has an API content of 5% and the rest is flour.In your experience what is the typical bias range (purity by area count minus purity by mass ratio)? 1.5 to 3% lower by latter accurate method?
Thank you. I trust people reading this feel reassured haha. I was just seeing some 100% results in some of the threads which is a big red flag and should immediately disqualify the integrity/quality of the supplier.Oh no no, nothing like that. It can easily range up to 95%. Normalisation used incorrectly can yield 100% pure result with something that has an API content of 5% and the rest is flour.
I just tell people if their testosterone was 95% table salt, area normalisation would show it at 100% pure anyway.Would be an instructive tool to allow customers to understand the risk involved in trusting area count purity metrics.
Although perhaps unclear to many, I really appreciate you reinforcing the point that sample prep/extraction plus lack of RRFs can be leveraged to obtain extremely misleading purity results. Thank you.I just tell people if their testosterone was 95% table salt, area normalisation would show it at 100% pure anyway.
Easier to imagine, less work for me.
That's expensive considering a source here sells 100 tablets of 50mg anavar for only $34
So what we talking about here, in terms of end points:
Alzheimer's, cancer, or heart disease much sooner or just a little bit sooner?
On top of the gear use.