XmadXscientist
Member
There is a productive way to vet a new source.
What’s your opinion on the proper way to go about this process?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a productive way to vet a new source.
Absolutely. While the "current method" is a bit sloppy with all the titty pic requests and some members just posting pointless expletives, many of the questions (like the list that Skull posted in a recent source thread) are productive and have, to an extent, yielded some positive results.
Some members will ride a sources ass relentlessly (Cdnguy, for example) and that too has caused a few shady sources to out themselves/trip themselves up.
It's not a perfect system, not sure that there really is one, but we have some incredibly smart members here that pay attention to detail and have a keen sense for smelling out scammers and bullshit.
He doesn' know a better way.@Big_paul
So I was asking a legitimate question, I put my guns away and haven’t had a chance to buy bullets.
Be tough but no reason to be rude. Stick to the facts or what we know about the source.What’s your opinion on the proper way to go about this process?
You so cute!
IncorrectYou so cute!
When given the stage to make a difference....You fail!
The truth is @Big_paul has never vetted a source. Never did any type of ground work to protect members from scumbag sources. All paul says is, "I ordered from source, I received my stuff" Paul supports anaboliclabs, but buys from steroids from unproven/tested sources (hypocritical.) At your ripe old age, I would have thought you learned a thing or two.
Paul relies on his membership start date as a status here on meso.
Hey bud, have you pm'd anybody about supporting any NEW sources lately.
Be tough but no reason to be rude. Stick to the facts or what we know about the source.
Yep have that list saved and always ready to post.Absolutely. While the "current method" is a bit sloppy with all the titty pic requests and some members just posting pointless expletives, many of the questions (like the list that Skull posted in a recent source thread) are productive and have, to an extent, yielded some positive results.
Some members will ride a sources ass relentlessly (Cdnguy, for example) and that too has caused a few shady sources to out themselves/trip themselves up.
It's not a perfect system, not sure that there really is one, but we have some incredibly smart members here that pay attention to detail and have a keen sense for smelling out scammers and bullshit.
I think its sad the way they always attempt to answer it. Always to slide through it or half-ass it. I bet when they see that list their jaws drop an silently say....fuck what am i going to say to that??? Smfdh its wtf they get for trying to sell shit on a non-source board who is a new over the night brewer with no sourcing experience.Yep have that list saved and always ready to post.
I think its sad the way they always attempt to answer it. Always to slide through it or half-ass it. I bet when they see that list their jaws drop an silently say....fuck what am i going to say to that??? Smfdh its wtf they get for trying to sell shit on a non-source board who is a new over the night brewer with no sourcing experience.
I don't know what you are talking about.was polite and respectful in my initial inquiry which I thought would be seen as waving the flag, but you ditched an honest question so I challenged you as a man a little bit. Now here we are, you deflecting the topic at hand.
I don't know what you are talking about.
I didn't know we were debating how to vet a source. You asked a question and I gave you my answer.
The difference between us is that to you every source is a scum bag and to me every source is a potential scum bag.
I feel like members in general are getting soft on sources. I think we all want that one good 1. Too many people telling the source what he needs to do. People are giving sources more advice on security and brewing g and testing than to a newb and how to search for gear. We are a community and need to stick together as one. And yes there are a few members selling us out and they also need to be held accountable. Who is always sticking up for a lab? Who always is on a labs dick? Too much BS these past few weeks. Let's bring meso back to the members. Fuck these dick riding shills sucking dick for free gear to say the gear is good and fuck these fly by night I'm semi private labs. If your on a forum and it's here forever it's not private.
I feel like members in general are getting soft on sources. I think we all want that one good 1. Too many people telling the source what he needs to do. People are giving sources more advice on security and brewing g and testing than to a newb and how to search for gear. We are a community and need to stick together as one. And yes there are a few members selling us out and they also need to be held accountable. Who is always sticking up for a lab? Who always is on a labs dick? Too much BS these past few weeks. Let's bring meso back to the members. Fuck these dick riding shills sucking dick for free gear to say the gear is good and fuck these fly by night I'm semi private labs. If your on a forum and it's here forever it's not private.
Wow seriously? This shows either your complete inability to put your pride aside or lack of higher intellect. Maybe you’re just a fucking dick. I took the first step in trying to open positive discourse and apparently that’s not good enough for you, what you want me to gently place your cock in my mouth and cup your balls?
A debate is not negative look up the description.
I’ve gone after ONE source who is dangerous to this community.
You’re being a petty little bitch and it’s clear where you stand as it relates to this community.
Way to be a pussy
Interesting to see this from you. If I remember correctly, in the past, you were someone that thought we were too hard on sources and dick riders. Correct? Like when you first joined.
