Sources on Mesorx

[Skull]

Simple give your honest review of the product in the appropriate thread and move on. No one will label anyone a shill for that.

Unless it jus so happens to be their first an only post.....Red flag for shill city all day on that one lol

 

[mghoward74]

The underground is about freedom of speech. Everyone has that right, whether it' a source or member.

 

[saucier]

@Millard Baker

How about a banner on all of the underground pages that warn new members and non-members about risks of ordering from an online source, purpose of underground, link to rules, and/or link to AnabolicLab.com?

 

[movingiron88]

@Millard Baker

How about a banner on all of the underground pages that warn new members and non-members about risks of ordering from an online source, purpose of underground, link to rules, and/or link to AnabolicLab.com?

@ulfbhert is that you?

 

[Steve84]

There is really no reason to "defend" a source at all, or sing praises to any source.
Simple give your honest review of the product in the appropriate thread and move on. No one will label anyone a shill for that.

Unless it jus so happens to be their first an only post.....Red flag for shill city all day on that one lol

Actually I disagree....
I "defend" PCOM by criticizing members that say it's bunk. But won't provide bloods or testing.
I have tested PCOM myself anonymously and have good test reports.

So anytime I've said something I get labeled as a shill or defending the lab.
In actuality I just want proof. Valid facts.
My bloods/testing shows positive things.
Yet everytime I say something on a members criticism I get criticized.

So I completely disagree... positive experiences/validated testing isn't enough for members to like my opinion. People just have loves and hates for certain labs.

 

[Skull]

Actually I disagree....
I "defend" PCOM by criticizing members that say it's bunk. But won't provide bloods or testing.
I have tested PCOM myself anonymously and have good test reports.

So anytime I've said something I get labeled as a shill or defending the lab.
In actuality I just want proof. Valid facts.
My bloods/testing shows positive things.
Yet everytime I say something on a members criticism I get criticized.

So I completely disagree... positive experiences/validated testing isn't enough for members to like my opinion. People just have loves and hates for certain labs.

Don't even worry what others say. If your tellin the truth about your experiences with a certian lab then your words are good an needs to be seen by other potential buyers. Guys around here are going to hate either way so fuck it. Dont let em get to you an deter you from giving an honest review brother.

 

[Steve84]

Don't even worry what others say. If your tellin the truth about your experiences with a certian lab then your words are good an needs to be seen by other potential buyers. Guys around here are going to hate either way so fuck it. Dont let em get to you an deter you from giving an honest review brother.

Oh I don't at all.. I just accept I'm viewed as the shill.
I provide the positive actual proof. The negative usually isn't backed up.
The problem is that positive review get buried with all the bullshit of back/forth posts between members arguing and calling each other names/shit.

Just meant this more in the context of sources/reviews and expressing support of labs. As in its hard to express support of a source.

 

[Sk8man101]

Actually I disagree....
I "defend" PCOM by criticizing members that say it's bunk. But won't provide bloods or testing.
I have tested PCOM myself anonymously and have good test reports.

So anytime I've said something I get labeled as a shill or defending the lab.
In actuality I just want proof. Valid facts.
My bloods/testing shows positive things.
Yet everytime I say something on a members criticism I get criticized.

So I completely disagree... positive experiences/validated testing isn't enough for members to like my opinion. People just have loves and hates for certain labs.

See what I'm talking about?^

This is not a thread about pharmacom. Nobody mentioned pharmacom. Nobody asked your opinion of pharmacom, or asked about your testing of pharmacom.

If you want to work a lab into a unrelated conversion you can do it in the appropriate thread or be labeled a shill.

 

[Sk8man101]

@Millard Baker

How about a banner on all of the underground pages that warn new members and non-members about risks of ordering from an online source, purpose of underground, link to rules, and/or link to AnabolicLab.com?

Front page man. Not trying to grill you but just for information for new people reading this.
I also suggest reading every sticky in the underground start to finish before posting reviews or asking questions.

Here are the official rules that Millard is will to ban you for. And he DOES ban people.
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/steroid-underground-rules.134349656/

 

[Steve84]

See what I'm talking about?^

This is not a thread about pharmacom. Nobody mentioned pharmacom. Nobody asked your opinion of pharmacom, or asked about your testing of pharmacom.

If you want to work a lab into a unrelated conversion you can do it in the appropriate thread or be labeled a shill.

Who really fucking cares the source? We are supposed to write stealth now?
I was writing a valid response....
I follow other sources, other threads...we all follow the same things pretty much. Like it's anyone's surprise when someone mentions a lab.
So i'm supposed to sit and watch, what do I write? What don't I not say?

 

[Sk8man101]

Who really fucking cares the source? We are supposed to write stealth now?
I was writing a valid response....
I follow other sources, other threads...we all follow the same things pretty much. Like it's anyone's surprise when someone mentions a lab.
So i'm supposed to sit and watch, what do I write? What don't I not say?

No we don't all follow the same threads haha.
If you want to see where people like to contribute on the board you can go threw their comment history, everything is transparent.

YOUR last 10 pages are entirely in the underground. Which is chill. If that's where you like to hang out then go for it. I'm just saying nobody is calling anyone a shill for no reason.

I have personally wrote countless of reviews for different sources on here good and bad and have never been labeled a shill. Others are the same. If a reputable member is calling you a shill then your a motherfucking shill.

 

[Sk8man101]

I just don't want to see all new sources ran off to protect existing sources That is how things work here if you allow it.

I thought you were anti-sources on meso?

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Front page man. Not trying to grill you but just for information for new people reading this.
I also suggest reading every sticky in the underground start to finish before posting reviews or asking questions.

Here are the official rules that Millard is will to ban you for. And he DOES ban people.
Steroid Underground RULES

Nice try, brother. But unless you're a source with a price list and contact information, the noobs ain't gonna bother reading your post. Sad but true.

 

[Sk8man101]

Nice try, brother. But unless you're a source with a price list and contact information, the noobs ain't gonna bother reading your post. Sad but true.

Nobody ever wants to listen to me
Hahaha

 

[Big_paul]

I thought you were anti-sources on meso?

I don't know who told you that. Im pro source until I have a reason to not be. They have to fuck up first.

 

[Sk8man101]

I don't know who told you that. Im pro source until I have a reason to not be. They have to fuck up first.

My bad then man.
I though I read something you wrote somewhere and must have been mistaken.

 

[MisterSuperGod]

I don't know who told you that. Im pro source until I have a reason to not be. They have to fuck up first.

Same here. i like having options at our disposal, but those options need to endure the trial by fire and earn our trust.

i also agree, if they fuck up, they should be bounced out, depending on the degree of fuck up, of course.

 

[Big_paul]

My bad then man.
I though I read something you wrote somewhere and must have been mistaken.

I have spoke out against sources but only after I had reason to.

 

[Big_paul]

Same here. i like having options at our disposal, but those options need to endure the trial by fire and earn our trust.

There is a productive way to vet a new source.

 

[MisterSuperGod]

There is a productive way to vet a new source.

Absolutely. While the "current method" is a bit sloppy with all the titty pic requests and some members just posting pointless expletives, many of the questions (like the list that Skull posted in a recent source thread) are productive and have, to an extent, yielded some positive results.

Some members will ride a sources ass relentlessly (Cdnguy, for example) and that too has caused a few shady sources to out themselves/trip themselves up.

It's not a perfect system, not sure that there really is one, but we have some incredibly smart members here that pay attention to detail and have a keen sense for smelling out scammers and bullshit.