Spectracell: Legit or Fake?

Use of Spectracell testing

  • Have used and not liked the test

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Have not used but beleive in the test

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
  • Poll closed .

m_ob

New Member
There is much hype about the Spectracell test for nutrient deficiencies. It does not seem very professional the way it is carried out
Q: What is SpectraCell Laboratories, Inc.?

A: The company was founded in 1993 to commercialize micronutrient testing. With the support of clinicians throughout the country, it has become the premier provider of functional testing.

Q: What is Micronutrient Testing?

A: SpectraCell's micronutrient testing is a next generation blood test for measuring specific vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and other essential micronutrients within an individual's white blood cells (lymphocytes). It is the gold standard for this type of test.

The gold standard??

Q: Who developed the technology?

A: William Shive, Ph.D., chairman of the department of biochemistry and a researcher in the field of nutrition at the University of Texas, began work on a diagnostic test for clinicians in 1978. His work was strongly influenced by researchers like Roger Williams, Ph.D., the progressive and eminent scientist who wrote Biochemical Individuality and discovered vitamin B5. SpectraCell later licensed this technology from the Clayton Foundation for Research.

Q: How was the technology developed?

A: Dr. Shive first identified appropriate cells for the functional assays. He selected lymphocyte cells because they are simple to collect (via venipuncture), easily isolated from other whole blood components, and maintainable in culture for days to weeks.

Q: How do lymphocytes provide a nutritional history?

A: Most lymphocytes obtained by venipuncture are in a resting state in terms of cell division. Since they have a 4- to 6-month lifespan, the nutrient levels accumulated in these lymphocytes represent a history of an individual's nutrient status. This situation is analogous to using HbA1c measurements to approximate a diabetic person's glucose levels over the months preceding a test. Thus, lymphocytes provide a history rather than a snapshot of nutrient intake.

Resting lymphocytes can be stimulated by a lymphocyte-specific mitogen to undergo cell division and grow in culture. The degree of growth that the lymphocytes can maintain is directly related to the nutrients they have available. Thus, our micronutrient testing provides a functional intracellular assessment of nutrient status accumulated in human lymphocytes over their resting lifespan.

Q: Is SpectraCell's Micronutrient Testing different from other tests?

A: SpectraCell’s tests are more clinically useful than standard serum tests. Standard tests only measure static quantities of vitamins and minerals present in serum, primarily reflecting dietary intake. But, with our patented technology, we assess long-term intracellular requirements using each patient’s lymphocytes. Under a variety of nutrient depletion conditions, we measure the growth response of these cells to mitogenic stimulation. This determines functional intracellular deficiencies, which might not be detected by standard serum tests, and provides a powerful clinical assessment tool

Q: What is a Functional (or Subclinical) Deficiency?

A: A functional deficiency encompasses any of the factors that reduce the efficacy of a nutrient. Thus, a given nutrient may be present, but it may not be properly activated, appropriately localized or have sufficient cofactors to function at a normal level of activity. No matter what the cause, the result will be a defect in the biochemical pathways that depend upon that nutrient for optimal function. A deficient or defective pathway may operate at a sub-optimal level for many months, or even years, before a clinical symptom becomes apparent.

Q: Why test Micronutrients?

A: Nutrient status is a vital foundation of health. Each micronutrient plays an indispensable role in promoting optimal cell function. When some cells do not function at their best, the foundation of our health is compromised, setting the stage for the development of disease. Identifying and correcting nutritional deficiencies is an important step in the long-term maintenance of optimal health.

Vitamin deficiencies aren’t just a reflection of diet. Since we are all biochemically unique, nutrient deficiencies will vary from patient to patient, and do not necessarily correlate directly with nutrient intake, even among those with similar health conditions. Many factors beyond diet determine whether nutrient function is adequate. These include biochemical individuality, genetic predisposition, absorption and metabolism, age, disease conditions and medications.

Q: What diseases or conditions are linked to nutrient imbalance?

A: Arthritis, Parkinson's, alcoholism/substance abuse, behavioral disorders, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, chronic fatigue, macular degeneration, diabetes, immune disorders, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and osteoporosis have been linked to nutrient imbalances. Studies published in 2002 in the Journal of the American Medical Association confirm the connection between nutrient deficiencies and disease processes
 
Here's the one that really get's me due to the fact that I don't trust anything you have to send in that is not taken directly at a legitimate lab.

Q: How do the tests work?

A: Blood is collected (no fasting is required) and sent to our laboratory. Lymphocyte cells are isolated and grown in a series of patented culture media. The cells are stimulated to grow in the control media containing optimal amounts of specific micronutrients. As each micronutrient is removed from the media, the cells must use their own internal mechanisms (reserves or metabolic processes) to grow. If cells grow optimally, they are functioning adequately and thus are not deficient. If cells do not grow optimally, then a deficiency is indicated. For example, when B12 is removed from the media and cell growth is not sufficient, this indicates that the lymphocyte cells have a functional intracellular deficiency of B12.
 
I have been using this test for over 3 years and it corresponds highly to symptoms people are experiencing.
For example if rt3 are high then there is usually a correlation between zinc or selenium defciency. I have seen several studies that have proven to be very benefical. I have used it on my self and iot has been backed up other testing to confirm results.
 
I'm not sure that this poll will establish the value of these labs. Actually the questions on the poll are more like a client satisfaction inventory. I would assume that any lab has got to maintain the data on their assays to validate the validity of their products. I have never looked at the statistical data used to validate the measures and outcomes used by a lab. I took a two day workshop from Dr. Marty Heinz a few years back. This doc is the fellow developing protocols to using amino acids to correct transmitter imbalances. He spent a fair amount of time discussing how he and his pharmacist established the validity. I must say, to own embarrasement, that I paid little attention. However, given the variabilities I've seen in my PSA's from LabCorp. I have wondered about the validity.
 
I'm not sure that this poll will establish the value of these labs. Actually the questions on the poll are more like a client satisfaction inventory. I would assume that any lab has got to maintain the data on their assays to validate the validity of their products. I have never looked at the statistical data used to validate the measures and outcomes used by a lab. I took a two day workshop from Dr. Marty Heinz a few years back. This doc is the fellow developing protocols to using amino acids to correct transmitter imbalances. He spent a fair amount of time discussing how he and his pharmacist established the validity. I must say, to own embarrasement, that I paid little attention. However, given the variabilities I've seen in my PSA's from LabCorp. I have wondered about the validity.

One must always wonder. Hell your putting your hard-earned money into these things.
 
I know that quackwatch and other clinical medicine sites state that the spectracell is a big scam and has no real place in medicine but I cannot help but feel that it has some good points and seems actually legit. It is around $400 though..
 
Can you order the test without a script?

Even if it does give you accurate information...does every single one of the nutrients in your body need to be "optimized"?
 
I know that quackwatch and other clinical medicine sites state that the spectracell is a big scam and has no real place in medicine but I cannot help but feel that it has some good points and seems actually legit. It is around $400 though..

Would not be a scam if insurance backs it my freind..
BC/BS, medicare, and many other insurance will pay a huge part of it.
 
I would still be looking for empirical support via statistical validation. I would not use the response of insurance companies to validate. Hell, I am currently battling my current insurer to get testosterone covered.:mad::mad::mad:
 
I would still be looking for empirical support via statistical validation. I would not use the response of insurance companies to validate. Hell, I am currently battling my current insurer to get testosterone covered.:mad::mad::mad:

Very very true.. sadly what is needed is not always seen as a necessity. I hate that about this world. Those out there who don't have to problem, do not need to care.. Some do, but others just let it be.
 
Ok, so I went to the lab site and found that it meets CLIA lab. requirements. So it satisfies certification requirements just as a hospital or other facility would have to be considered suitable for medical testing. Next the question becomes, do the tests that they off contribute to some legitimate aspect of health care. They site a 2002 JAMA study that links nutritional deficiencies to certain deseases. Unfortunately, the study in question is not posted. They compared their assays to Ha1g (sp?) for long term blood sugar assessment. Impressive.

Empirically, the next step, beyond looking at that 2002 study, would be to research each of nutritional deficiencies and look at the literature supporting each of the deseases sited.

Now, if I suspected that I had one these deseases, I'd be looking for answers. "Entrez Pubmed" is a good friend of mine.:)
 
No one can prove a negative. You'd need to show me scientific studies demonstrating the validity, accuracy and benefits of SpectraCell testing. Without that, there's no reason to think it is anything other than a scam.

But this is typical of the crap that HAN uses. This is another demonstration of HAN BS. If he wasn't taken so seriously by some, he would be pathetic. There has yet to be shown once (only once) of a diagnosis/treatment. NOT ONE.

HAN is not even thorough enough or thinks posters are worthy enough to post or cite support for his hocus pocus magic crap. I have attached an article that tries to support SpectraCell. I said tries - unsuccessfully.


The following are notes I had on SpectraCell. They might be from a web page, etc.

SpectraCell provided me with 3 articles when I requested information on the scientific basis on the test:

1. GLUCOSE AND INSULIN RESPONSES IN ISOLATED HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES REFLECT IN-VIVO STATUS - EFFECTS OF VLCD TREATMENT, TU KY, MATTHEWS R, TOPEK NH, et al., BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Volume: 202 Issue: 2 Pages: 1169-1175 Published: 1994. Number of times cited: 2

2. NUTRITIONAL-REQUIREMENTS FOR GROWTH OF HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES, SHIVE W, MATTHEWS KS, ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUTRITION Volume: 8 Pages: 81-97 Published: 1988 Number of times cited: 9

3. DEVELOMENT OF LYMPHOCYTE CULTURE METHODS FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE NUTRITIONAL AND METABOLIC STATUS OF INDIVIDUALS, SHIVE W., J INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF PREVENTITIVE MEDICINE VOLUME: 4 14 PAGES. Citations unknown. Article likely not peer reviewed.

The research presented in these papers consists of two parts.

1. The development of a minimal growth medium for lymphocytes. This appears solid research that was subsequently used by others to assist in growing lymphocytes in the laboratory.

2. The use of this growth method to assess nutritional deficiencies in humans. This research was presented in (3) and consisted only of anecdotal information on a few human subjects. The author stated that this research is still incomplete and requires double blind studies for verification. The latter has not been carried out.

To conclude: The assertions made by Anonymous that the research on which the SpectraCell test is based is flawed and outdated is correct.


Shive W, Matthews KS. Nutritional requirements for growth of human lymphocytes. Annu Rev Nutr 1988;8:81-97.

Bucci LR. A functional analytical technique for monitoring nutrient status and repletion. Part 3: clinical experience. Am Clin Lab 1994;13(5):10-1.

This paper, third in a series describing a testing procedure for nutrient analysis, will focus on clinical experiences after targeted repletion of deficient nutrients. Part one described the Essential Metabolics Analysis (EMA) procedure (SpectraCell Laboratories, Houston, TX), which determines functional status of 19 nutrients by measuring lymphocyte growth responses to variations of a patented, chemically defined serum-free medium. Part two described validation studies of lymphocytes as markers for whole body nutrient status and metabolic functions. EMA provides a sensitive, specific, and accurate method of determining nutrient needs, requirements, or deficiencies for each individual.

Bucci LR. A functional analytical technique for monitoring nutrient status and repletion--part 2: validation. Am Clin Lab 1994;13(3):25-7.

Bucci LR. A functional analytical technique for monitoring nutrient status and repletion. Am Clin Lab 1993;12(6):8, 10.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
No one can prove a negative. You'd need to show me scientific studies demonstrating the validity, accuracy and benefits of SpectraCell testing. Without that, there's no reason to think it is anything other than a scam.

But this is typical of the crap that HAN uses. This is another demonstration of HAN BS. If he wasn't taken so seriously by some, he would be pathetic. There has yet to be shown once (only once) of a diagnosis/treatment. NOT ONE.

HAN is not even thorough enough or thinks posters are worthy enough to post or cite support for his hocus pocus magic crap. I have attached an article that tries to support SpectraCell. I said tries - unsuccessfully.


The following are notes I had on SpectraCell. They might be from a web page, etc.

SpectraCell provided me with 3 articles when I requested information on the scientific basis on the test:

1. GLUCOSE AND INSULIN RESPONSES IN ISOLATED HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES REFLECT IN-VIVO STATUS - EFFECTS OF VLCD TREATMENT, TU KY, MATTHEWS R, TOPEK NH, et al., BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Volume: 202 Issue: 2 Pages: 1169-1175 Published: 1994. Number of times cited: 2

2. NUTRITIONAL-REQUIREMENTS FOR GROWTH OF HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES, SHIVE W, MATTHEWS KS, ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUTRITION Volume: 8 Pages: 81-97 Published: 1988 Number of times cited: 9

3. DEVELOMENT OF LYMPHOCYTE CULTURE METHODS FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE NUTRITIONAL AND METABOLIC STATUS OF INDIVIDUALS, SHIVE W., J INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF PREVENTITIVE MEDICINE VOLUME: 4 14 PAGES. Citations unknown. Article likely not peer reviewed.

The research presented in these papers consists of two parts.

1. The development of a minimal growth medium for lymphocytes. This appears solid research that was subsequently used by others to assist in growing lymphocytes in the laboratory.

2. The use of this growth method to assess nutritional deficiencies in humans. This research was presented in (3) and consisted only of anecdotal information on a few human subjects. The author stated that this research is still incomplete and requires double blind studies for verification. The latter has not been carried out.

To conclude: The assertions made by Anonymous that the research on which the SpectraCell test is based is flawed and outdated is correct.


Shive W, Matthews KS. Nutritional requirements for growth of human lymphocytes. Annu Rev Nutr 1988;8:81-97.

Bucci LR. A functional analytical technique for monitoring nutrient status and repletion. Part 3: clinical experience. Am Clin Lab 1994;13(5):10-1.

This paper, third in a series describing a testing procedure for nutrient analysis, will focus on clinical experiences after targeted repletion of deficient nutrients. Part one described the Essential Metabolics Analysis (EMA) procedure (SpectraCell Laboratories, Houston, TX), which determines functional status of 19 nutrients by measuring lymphocyte growth responses to variations of a patented, chemically defined serum-free medium. Part two described validation studies of lymphocytes as markers for whole body nutrient status and metabolic functions. EMA provides a sensitive, specific, and accurate method of determining nutrient needs, requirements, or deficiencies for each individual.

Bucci LR. A functional analytical technique for monitoring nutrient status and repletion--part 2: validation. Am Clin Lab 1994;13(3):25-7.

Bucci LR. A functional analytical technique for monitoring nutrient status and repletion. Am Clin Lab 1993;12(6):8, 10.

and the truth comes out.
 
Yep and from using spectracell test correcting zinc deficiencies identified rt3 drop, e2 goes down, testosterone and LH goes up paitents get improvements in symptoms in hundreds of patients. My goal is to get people feeling better by manipulating hormones as well as properly supporting their nutrients in the process. Patients feed back has been overwhelming to say the least. Again its only a piece of the puzzle.
 
i always thought spectracell was pretty accurate, although some of my of readings seemed to be a bit off at times..
 
Hello, I have had micronutrient testing done by (first) Spectracell and then Genova Diagnostics. I was not a healthy person at the time In fact, I was very seriously ill. I'd felt for years - decades, that I didn't absorb nutrients properly. I can't tell you how many doctors dismissed or even snickered at this idea. After all, my standard blood panels were close to perfect, every time. I developed migraines, then hypothyroid and then atrial fibrillation, which got so bad one doctor sent me to the er every time I saw her, and a long time ER nurse told me she'd never seen anyone with my (usual) EKG be responsive, let alone ambulatory. Then, my memory went. Not just forgetfuness, but cognitive skills and I lost language, and scrambled words. I am a sculptor, working in wood, but forgot how to carve, sew and anything else I ever used my hands for. Then my spectracell tests came back and my doctor was floored. I was severely deficient in nearly everything, but especially minerals. She began giving me B12 shots and highly digestable vitains and minerals and my memory came back ( it is fully back now). Magnesium deficiencies can cause migraines, hypothyroid, atrial fibrillation and dementia, and mine caused all of them. No doctor EVER mentioned this possibility. My electrophysiologist, one of the best in the world, acknowledges it but STILL dismisses it as significant. Who is the real fraud? I now take a light antiarrythmic and that is all - no coumadin or other harsh drugs and no pacemaker. No antiarrythmic worked before but now they do.

Because most of my relatives on my father's side have the same conditions I have, and the older members have had dementia, I pursued the likelyhood that my family carried a gene that blocks absorption of nutrients, and especially minerals. The first thing I did was have my children (both of whom have migraines) tested, and found they too had deficiencies, just not yet as bad as mine. We used Genova Diagnostics for them, and also for me, because we wanted to do a recheck once my health issues began to resolve. My tests from Genova matched those of Spectracell. That alone should set to rest any qestions people have about the validity of these tests. But, Genova itself had doubts. They believed my results ( from their own tests) were scientifically impossible, They offered to repeat them on their own dime, so I had the tests repeated a third time. By this time, I'd been on Spectracell recommended supplements for 9 months. Genova came back and said "Oh, yeah, sorry, our mistake. Your test results look really good." the only significant deficiency was in molybdenum, a trace mineral I'd never heard of before. what the lab didn't understand was that their test was not flawed. I had gotten well. I know the test results were not flawed, because I was used to being told my test results weren't 'medically possible'. My EKG never matched my blood results. Now they do.

A word about the websites like quackwatch ( especially Quackwatch). We don't know who owns those sites, but I have a good idea. Quackwatch attacks literally every form of treatment and even every disorder that is not treated with pharmaceuticals. All Eastern medicine, all modern discoveries, allergies, supplements - you name it. And, things like Sensory Integration Dysfunction, which is treated with occupational medicine. they dont believe in anything but medication for ADHD and autism, even though no expert and no legitmate physician would recommend that. I hate to think of the harm they cause because people take them seriously, They are the biggest frauds out there. And on the other hand, some of the things they list ARE fraudulant and their dogma almost legitimizes those things.

I did a lot of research before I had micronutrient testing. I found a GP who has a background in nutrition (something all doctors should have), and she was all for it. Now, looking back, I think my concern was a bit silly. This testing is not invasive or unsafe, it's just expensive. But actually, It's not. I certainly see the doctor less now - all those copays add up! I paid 65.00 for it (my insurance covered the rest). I spent much more than that every month on vitamins that amounted to expensive pee, because the quality was not up to my needs. I was not absorbing them. This testing saved me a lot of money. And then there is my health. My school nurse expressed concern that I was malnourished back in first grade, and NO doctor ever agreed to pursue that concern. My health literally declined for 50 years before I was able to do this. What a waste!

I am currently campaigning my family to test themselves and their children. Some are enthusiastic about it and others are skeptical. It's such a shame to be skeptical about something like this, especially when my own health has imprived so dramatically. I think some people just don't want to face weakness, even if they can solve it. We have one member with dementia and have lost at least two with that hideous disease. We don't have to do this any longer.

Presumably everyone on this list is healthy and thriving. This testing might not reveal much to you, But you may have friends or relatives who do have poor health, and it could give them their lives back, as it did me. Now you can recommend it with a clear conscience.
 
and the truth comes out.

How do you know that? Anyone can sign up on a forum claiming to be a doctor, and many doctors are not at all knowledgable about nutrition. Virtually none of them get much training in the subject ( those who do specifically seek it out). An auto mechanic knows that knowing what fuels a car and how important the proper balance is, but too few doctors have the same respect for what fuels our bodies, or how an imbalance can foul us.

This is not an attack on doctors, but on the system that creates them. A background in nutritiion can give any doctor a whole bag of new tools and a support system that double checks and backs up their diagnoses. I am so relieved to finally have found a doctor who has that tool bag.

Any doctor who wants to test the micronutrient tests can run two tests from different companies and compare the results. It's that simple. I tested through two and they agreed. I was treated according to their recommendations and got my health back. And THAT is the real truth.
 
Back
Top