Stanford Pharmaceuticals

[CdnGuy]

Very excited!

Meet too cuz if shit goes south down the road . We don't have to think twice about who's getting the lynch mob lol

 

[TorroXL]

Meet too cuz if shit goes south down the road . We don't have to think twice about who's getting the lynch mob lol

Right. Wrong. Indifferent. I got dudes back. However, at this particular juncture... All is I see is right. Internet lynching is the least of my worries as @bickel29 knows first hand how my year has been, on a more personal level too. Thank you for your time and concern

 

[Docd187123]

"Here's five grand. Make the test a good one."

That and the old "I know I'm being tested on this order so let me make sure I add a little extra to the vial"...

 

[CdnGuy]

Right. Wrong. Indifferent. I got dudes back. However, at this particular juncture... All is I see is right. Internet lynching is the least of my worries as @bickel29 knows first hand how my year has been, on a more personal level too. Thank you for your time and concern

How your years been man?!?! You're preaching to the choir but do you hear me complaining? Smh Getting no pity from me! Best regards. ..

 

[Stanfordpharma1]

@StanfordPharma

I had some made and it sold out before i was able to announce it. I wil have more ready monday or Tuesday.

 

[Stanfordpharma1]

So you're going to knowingly give product to be tested to whomever is chosen to do the testing? How do you not see the glaring issue in that?

I am not gonna know who is sending the product to be tested. I am staying out of it so it can be as unbiased as possible. Whomever the board chooses to send i will pay for it and compensate for time and loss "after" the fact. If this is not the most transparent and unbiased way I'm all ears.

 

[Test_Subject]

Whomever the board chooses to send i will pay for it and compensate for time and loss "after" the fact. If this is not the most transparent and unbiased way I'm all ears.

That's fine assuming that you have zero contact with the person sending the sample and they aren't already biased.

There's the rub.

Do we really know that the random sample isn't the best of the best sent by a fan?

 

[Ryno1980]

Can i be in the elite club of Rooks as well

Me too?

 

[Ryno1980]

Wow..... That seems, impossible, really... You're lucky, man. I get it all the time. Comes in waves. Some cycles I get it almost every pin, some I get it maybe one or two times... Regardless, I'm jealous.

I can't pin tren without getting the cough.. it's almost expected now says .. I feel cheated if I don't get it.

 

[Stanfordpharma1]

That's fine assuming that you have zero contact with the person sending the sample and they aren't already biased.

There's the rub.

Do we really know that the random sample isn't the best of the best sent by a fan?

Yes sir, thats why I'm staying out of it and letting the board choose. I will have nothing to say over it. You guys choose who you trust and the product to be tested.

 

[Skull]

I can't pin tren without getting the cough.. it's almost expected now says .. I feel cheated if I don't get it.

The dredded tren fits...i do not miss em lmfao

 

[Ryno1980]

The dredded tren fits...i do not miss em lmfao

I kindnof like it now that I know i won't die most likely... I'm with penche tho.. first time I got the cough from comp th it was a bit of a let down compared to just good ol china raws.. not sure what the difference is but it's always been worse on regular ol tren e or a than on the comp or fina

 

[Ryno1980]

That's fine assuming that you have zero contact with the person sending the sample and they aren't already biased.

There's the rub.

Do we really know that the random sample isn't the best of the best sent by a fan?

I can't speak for him, but I think he is saying behind the scenes, decide who is gonna test a product after its already in hand, not announce ahead of time who the lucky tester will be prior to him making an order...juSt what I got from this.. .

 

[Test_Subject]

decide who is gonna test a product after its already in hand

So your sample size is reduced to existing customers.

That's a problem.

 

[Ryno1980]

So your sample size is reduced to existing customers.

That's a problem.

That's a good point.. didn't think of it that way

 

[ZDogg]

Not sure how anyone wants to do it, but I have Test P, NPP, Adrol, Win, and WinAvar, of his. Glad to help with any of those, if someone wants to pick a way to do it.

 

[Stanfordpharma1]

So your sample size is reduced to existing customers.

That's a problem.

Not exactly sure i understand the discrepancy here. Who else would there be other than existing customers? My existing customers are in control of 100% of product being sold. Like i said, if there's a more transparent or preferred method I'm all ears.

 

[flenser]

So you're going to knowingly give product to be tested to whomever is chosen to do the testing? How do you not see the glaring issue in that?

When I read the announcement the integrity of his offer didn't really strike me as suspicious. But this part definitely brings back pre-ABlabs memories:

In the meantime i will test one batch of raws a month to test and post the results. Both test will be done by analyzer. Thank you.

So if I am reading this right, testing has not been done in the past, or possibly limited testing less that what is being promised above. It's still an improvement over what I had believed earlier as this entire thread is one big vet promotion of his products. Not too long ago untested raws coming out of China had about a 10% chance of being dosed above 30%, and less than half the black market testing services were remotely accurate.

I don't know what the markets are like today. Maybe they have improved. But as a customer my primary concern is always knowing as much about what I'm buying as possible. I know from experience under dosed or mislabeled gear is a huge bummer.

 

[Stanfordpharma1]

When I read the announcement the integrity of his offer didn't really strike me as suspicious. But this part definitely brings back pre-ABlabs memories:



So if I am reading this right, testing has not been done in the past, or possibly limited testing less that what is being promised above. It's still an improvement over what I had believed earlier as this entire thread is one big vet promotion of his products. Not too long ago untested raws coming out of China had about a 10% chance of being dosed above 30%, and less than half the black market testing services were remotely accurate.

I don't know what the markets are like today. Maybe they have improved. But as a customer my primary concern is always knowing as much about what I'm buying as possible. I know from experience under dosed or mislabeled gear is a huge bummer.

As stated in my original post i have every thing tested via melting point test with a melting point apparatus. I have been in contact with analyzer about testing 1 or 2 powders a month.

 

[flenser]

As stated in my original post i have every thing tested via melting point test with a melting point apparatus. I have been in contact with analyzer about testing 1 or 2 powders a month.

Honestly I didn't read your OP. I mostly just read the posts of the people giving you the thumbs up. You were a private source with some apparently loyal customers. Then you came to MESO, made some public offers and received only token scrutiny. People I have come to trust seem to trust you.

But you are confirming you don't really know much about the quality of your products, and the people who trust you apparently know this. I don't get it. It's too much of a contradiction.