MESO-Rx Sponsor Steroidify - Official Worldwide Pharma Distributor since 2008

[ThE SiCkNeSs]

Hey Darius, are you matching the buy $300 get $200 free promo basicstero is doing?

 

[IronJulius]

I really need anything they have I was just looking at the Adex and the pricing on the dbol tabs. Again, not really needed just poking around and being domestic Pharmacon made me curious.

i have had probably a hand full of domestic sources take longer than pharmacomstore. never has it took over a week for me to get from Darius

 

[R0IDB0Y]

Hey Darius, are you matching the buy $300 get $200 free promo basicstero is doing?

I actually e mailed him this question last night and he responded he wasn't this morning.

 

[Fouts]

Here you go! Took me a while to get it done had a lot going on but this is what I got and I'm not a happy camper.

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/blood-work-pharmacom-test-e-and-eq.134369029/

 

[Wunderpus]

Here you go! Took me a while to get it done had a lot going on but this is what I got and I'm not a happy camper.

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/blood-work-pharmacom-test-e-and-eq.134369029/

Woah, holy shit. I am actually shocked... Did you get this around when Anaboliclab tested it??

Sorry to see this... :/

 

[Tren Warrior]

Holy crap...

Thats why anaboliclab is so dangerous. People believe in the test results but dont realise that the product can be bunk anyway.

 

[rigs03]

Damn.

 

[fodsod]

Holy crap...

Thats why anaboliclab is so dangerous. People believe in the test results but dont realise that the product can be bunk anyway.

Very true. The only thing testing shows is that particular test sample is good/bad or whatever. It's more of a tool rather than the bible of proof positive.

 

[Wunderpus]

Very true. The only thing testing shows is that particular test sample is good/bad or whatever. It's more of a tool rather than the bible of proof positive.

Overtime it SHOULD demonstrate a pattern. I am confused as Pharmacom's products have been some of the most tested so far, more or less all have scored well. I think there was an underdosing issue with the test P?

 

[Wunderpus]

View attachment 29625

Couldn't help myself, you corrected him.

 

[IronJulius]

Overtime it SHOULD demonstrate a pattern. I am confused as Pharmacom's products have been some of the most tested so far, more or less all have scored well. I think there was an underdosing issue with the test P?

yea test P came up 89.6 and was still in the green

 

[ironwill1951]

I recently received some deca 300 and the vials had no ceramic logo on them is this normal ?

 

[Steroidify]

Here you go! Took me a while to get it done had a lot going on but this is what I got and I'm not a happy camper.
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/blood-work-pharmacom-test-e-and-eq.134369029/

From what I understand the order was made in mid April. For a short period of time we indeed had some glitches with our packaging, including 2 orders that were mislabeled. It was also discussed on my thread.
Several vials of DECA 300 which were labeled as NOLTOS ( mix of 4 Deca esters). These cases were extremely rare, human errors to be blamed.

That problem was already fixed some time ago. Starting from May all my Pharmacom imports are already labeled.

It could've happened to products that have the similar colored plastic top like Testosterones, Nandrolones, Trenbolones etc
In this case, most probably it was PhenylPropionate or Propionate instead.


To support my theory let's send it to SIMEC on my expense and straighten things out.

Tesosterone is Pharmacom no. 1 best seller and it was recently widely reviewed, labmaxed and tested by numerous members on multiple boards and results speak for themselves.

Please accept my apologies, you'll have all the Testosterone vials reshipped + 300$ store credit to use anytime you want.

 

[penche]

I knew it would be made right. Very nice.

 

[Millard]

Thats why anaboliclab is so dangerous. People believe in the test results but dont realise that the product can be bunk anyway.

Anaboliclab "so dangerous"?! I think not.

 

[rutman]

Anaboliclab "so dangerous"?! I think not.

I think what he's referring to is a lab is only as good as their current batch of raws. What tested correctly dosed back in April, could very well be underdosed next month. I can see a valid point being made there.

I don't totally agree with it being dangerous, but people have to realize that these tests are limited to one vial.

 

[Tren Warrior]

Anaboliclab "so dangerous"?! I think not.

Dont understand this wrong. I love this site. But yes, its dangerous.

@Darius PharmacomStore

Thanks. I hope we can solve this problem.

 

[Millard]

I think what he's referring to is a lab is only as good as their current batch of raws. What tested correctly dosed back in April, could very well be underdosed next month. I can see a valid point being made there.

I don't totally agree with it being dangerous, but people have to realize that these tests are limited to one vial.

Dont understand this wrong. I love this site. But yes, its dangerous.

There is nothing dangerous about hard data. The problems arise from how it is used/misused and interpreted/misinterpreted.

Place the blame where it belongs.

 

[rpbb]

Holy crap...

Thats why anaboliclab is so dangerous. People believe in the test results but dont realise that the product can be bunk anyway.

Tren, it's been stated a thousand times not to use the results as your only source of information. These are still ugl sources, and are never to be completely trusted. However, it does provide a valuable STARTING point in your research as to what source to purchase from.

 

[rutman]

There is nothing dangerous about hard data. The problems arise from how it is used/misused and interpreted/misinterpreted.

Place the blame where it belongs.

That's what I'm saying. There are people out there that will def misinterpret the data and think that the source is "gtg" because of one vial testing legit.

I'm not calling it dangerous. I believe it's an excellent tool to keep some of these labs on point and hold them somewhat accountable.