mp46
New Member
I mean...the margin of error on those compounds that were tested were slim MINUS the EQ test. That one is just fucked.
Are you looking for them to test right at 100.0 mg or 125.0 mg per ML? I'd rather my shit be slightly overdosed than underdosed anyday but that's just me.
He also stated somewhere I believe (could be wrong) that he aimed for a 2% margin of error. From raw testing all the way to the end brew, there's quite a bit of room for error.
I don't see those tests as being bad (once again, other than the EQ). So I don't see the "he's messed up dosing on everything else", when it's actually pretty fuckin' close.
Just my opinion.
Maybe @janoshik can clarify the margin of error on testing but if you know the purity of your raw and you can measure correctly there’s absolutely no reason to be off by anything other than the testing margins, it’s simple math. This much raw @ X purity + oil + solvent = proper dosed AAS.