MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

SymBiotics (U.S. domestic)

JC Grifter said:
I’ve been meaning to look into this. How does it work? You print out a script and take it to LabCorp?
Click to expand...
If it's the same as private md labs, yes. You pay them, and then login and print out a form to bring to labcorp. Got to be the same, but look into it.
 
Thank guys, This is what I found , they have a lab that's like 2 miles away from me. Hoping to get done by next month along with the SHBG Test.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20200305-134949_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20200305-134949_Samsung Internet.jpg
    291.1 KB · Views: 45
BigMo said:
The one for that price is for females, unless I'm looking in the wrong place. I'll keep looking though.
Thanks
Click to expand...

If you read the listing for that panel on their website, it states can be used for females and males. It doesn’t matter. However, you need to specify which gender you are when selecting the panel so they can apply the correct reference ranges. That’s a great panel for $75.
 
Horimono said:
If you read the listing for that panel on their website, it states can be used for females and males. It doesn’t matter. However, you need to specify which gender you are when selecting the panel so they can apply the correct reference ranges. That’s a great panel for $75.
Click to expand...
Agree excellent price... you think you can get away w no e2 sensitive though? I was always told it is a must.
 
Grab Bag said:
Agree excellent price... you think you can get away w no e2 sensitive though? I was always told it is a must.
Click to expand...

I have never ordered sensitive. Even when running Nandrolones. I know it’s recommended with Tren and Deca. But without a Nandrolone, I don’t see the point. It will be accurate.
 
Horimono said:
Whoever told you that is full of shit.
Click to expand...

I must be the guy that’s full of shit. I’ve written this before on MESO...

LC/MS/MS is much more accurate than the standard ECLIA. Give it a try the next time and compare your results running the same amount of test and AI. You’re going to see different values.

The ECLIA was primarily for women and they obviously have higher E2 cause well, they’re women [emoji2369] (about 4-5x higher).

When men use the ECLIA our levels are lower and the accuracy of the method suffers. You’re getting “ballpark” numbers back and those can be 10, 20, 30 pg/ml higher. Not much but could be the difference between a result of 30 and 60. With an inaccurate reading of 60 you’re upping your AI dose but your ACTUAL E2 level is 30 so you come close to crashing it based on an inaccurate number from your blood tests.

The LC/MS/MS is much more accurate and returns a real value. It’s sensitive enough to pick up the lower male values more precisely.
 
BigBaldBeardGuy said:
I must be the guy that’s full of shit. I’ve written this before on MESO...

LC/MS/MS is much more accurate than the standard ECLIA. Give it a try the next time and compare your results running the same amount of test and AI. You’re going to see different values.

The ECLIA was primarily for women and they obviously have higher E2 cause well, they’re women [emoji2369] (about 4-5x higher).

When men use the ECLIA our levels are lower and the accuracy of the method suffers. You’re getting “ballpark” numbers back and those can be 10, 20, 30 pg/ml higher. Not much but could be the difference between a result of 30 and 60. With an inaccurate reading of 60 you’re upping your AI dose but your ACTUAL E2 level is 30 so you come close to crashing it based on an inaccurate number from your blood tests.

The LC/MS/MS is much more accurate and returns a real value. It’s sensitive enough to pick up the lower male values more precisely.
Click to expand...

correct. always, always, always get sensitive.
 
BigBaldBeardGuy said:
I must be the guy that’s full of shit. I’ve written this before on MESO...

LC/MS/MS is much more accurate than the standard ECLIA. Give it a try the next time and compare your results running the same amount of test and AI. You’re going to see different values.

The ECLIA was primarily for women and they obviously have higher E2 cause well, they’re women [emoji2369] (about 4-5x higher).

When men use the ECLIA our levels are lower and the accuracy of the method suffers. You’re getting “ballpark” numbers back and those can be 10, 20, 30 pg/ml higher. Not much but could be the difference between a result of 30 and 60. With an inaccurate reading of 60 you’re upping your AI dose but your ACTUAL E2 level is 30 so you come close to crashing it based on an inaccurate number from your blood tests.

The LC/MS/MS is much more accurate and returns a real value. It’s sensitive enough to pick up the lower male values more precisely.
Click to expand...
nealcaffrey16 said:
correct. always, always, always get sensitive.
Click to expand...
Could either of you guys recommend a current mid cycle package panel on labsmd or privatemd (or any similar site)? They have added a ton of packages since the “basics of ordering bloodwork thread,” and I have looked through extensively, but the stuff I’m seeing that has e2 sensitive as well as lcms free and total test is around $130, which seems a bit high for mid cycle bloods. Thanks.
 
BigBaldBeardGuy said:
I must be the guy that’s full of shit. I’ve written this before on MESO...

LC/MS/MS is much more accurate than the standard ECLIA. Give it a try the next time and compare your results running the same amount of test and AI. You’re going to see different values.

The ECLIA was primarily for women and they obviously have higher E2 cause well, they’re women [emoji2369] (about 4-5x higher).

When men use the ECLIA our levels are lower and the accuracy of the method suffers. You’re getting “ballpark” numbers back and those can be 10, 20, 30 pg/ml higher. Not much but could be the difference between a result of 30 and 60. With an inaccurate reading of 60 you’re upping your AI dose but your ACTUAL E2 level is 30 so you come close to crashing it based on an inaccurate number from your blood tests.

The LC/MS/MS is much more accurate and returns a real value. It’s sensitive enough to pick up the lower male values more precisely.
Click to expand...

When I first started on TRT 3 yrs ago I had a hell of a time regulating my E2. As do a lot of men here. Especially when we are blasting and cruising. I got my E2 regulated with the non sensitive test. It wasn’t just 1 test. It was many. When I go to my TRT to have my E2 spot checked, I betcha $10 they aren’t choosing LC/MS/MS. So...it must not be that inaccurate. My experience has shown that choosing the more sensitive test is not always needed. Just my experience. I value yours. I value your opinion too.
@Grab Bag
@nealcaffrey16
 
So I'm getting ready to buy...just considering this source instead of my go to....but after 30 pages of bullshit posts about Kim and murder attempts vis keyboard soldiers....I've decided I'll just tap into my emergency stash for a few weeks n decide later

This source seems to be lagging. As are others. No shit talking here. Just wanna buy in peace

But the only good thing about the last 30 pages or so were a couple of big ol fat titties

I love titties

I prefer shapely titties on girls with nice bodies...not necessarily models but at least health conscious

Those titties in display were not what I like

But they were better than the trash I read about people bashing each other

We're not in highschool...no one will be prom king

Let's just focus on the goods...gear and gains
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NeoAnabolics
Neo Anabolics (US DOMESTIC)
19 20 21
Replies
410
Views
13K
Vanargandar
Vanargandar
Minty
Mint Anabolics - US Domestic Source
8 9 10
Replies
180
Views
11K
FastBun
F
A
WARNING GenericAsia shipping box showing oil leak on the outside
Replies
4
Views
373
B Ware
B Ware
Sampei
Stoppers materials
Replies
14
Views
204
Sampei
Sampei
Sampei
ISO bath to sterilize
2
Replies
20
Views
315
Sampei
Sampei

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top