Test and e2 good. Libido in the trash

Haha. I agree with Jim. It's mostly the fact that I saw my bloods were good but still don't feel like I think I should is what has got me going crazy. I have stopped putting a lot of thought into it and will just go through it with my doctor. I will keep you all posted if we find anything and hopefully it helps someone.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
There is one HUGE problem aiding anyone with ED or SD. And that is the lack of an OBJECTIVE measure that defines the diagnosis.

- like those who doesn't have a DAILY morning erection now qualify as having ED?
- if someone doesn't "want" to have sex every minute or hour of the day now has SD?


I could go on and on but suffice it to say, in the absence of reproducible evidence based criteria the diagnosis of EITHER SD or ED becomes a crap shoot without meaning, purpose OR effective treatment and aiding those on a PED forum is rarely helpful, especially when "hormonally mediated" phenomena are the only etiology being entertained

The latter is particularly true when those who complain of ED or SD fail to include or discount those psychosocial stressors that are often the PRIMARY cause for such complaints.


Hello Jim, very interesting your answer. It is not my idea to seems offensive to your answer, but I would like to make some small criticisms of a practical nature.

1. Do you have any proposal of meaning or purpose that you could share? Or what is your personal purpose or purpose?

2. The phenomenon of self-referentiality (I hope you have understood correctly) that you mention regarding the nature of the subject suffering from ED or SD, seems to be a sufficient reason for you to remove this kind of patient from the field of injections. That is, it would seem that you (I understand that this is only a forum) makes an abstract or theoretical division between patients in the realm of the trt itself and patients with emotional problems immersed in the self-referential dynamics that you aptly describe. But this division, from what criterion arises in practice? Will it be from a criterion that gives primacy to sexuality both genital and emotionally? Or is it only genital? (Apparently because if this was your answer, you would also have to consider the raw emotional factor in your answer, without academic statements, since you know perfectly well that each drug has an idiosyncrasy and therefore an associated emotional content ).
3. I am interested to know your proposal or the bottom line that you handle, due to the reasons given in the previous question.

4. Do not misunderstand me I am also an idiot, but sometimes your proposals sound like trt is a "sectarian question". In Chile, the only solution available, in general, is viagra or injection.
Thank you.
 
Ignorant because he mentioned OP problems may be psychological???

And OP is on psych meds...

How is he ignorant now?
 
Ddp I wouldn't bother he's full of ignorance mate.

I present my apologies. I'm not looking to change anyone. I am looking for honest and explicit answers. And it has not been my intention to be unpleasant, if it was that I was. In any case, my job is to argue, it does not go with violence.
 
Ignorant because he mentioned OP problems may be psychological???

And OP is on psych meds...

How is he ignorant now?

Let's avoid paranoia and leave the false dilemmas for small children.And not,OP dont take "psych meds".
Thank you.
 
Let's avoid paranoia and leave the false dilemmas for small children.And not,OP dont take "psych meds".
Thank you.

You are incorrect. Here is your proof:

I have been looking into side effects cause by SSRI medication. I came off Effexor about 4 or 5 months ago because it made me drowsy and difficult to cum. Honestly I think my levels are fine, and my issue may be serotonin related.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
Hello Jim, very interesting your answer. It is not my idea to seems offensive to your answer, but I would like to make some small criticisms of a practical nature.

1. Do you have any proposal of meaning or purpose that you could share? Or what is your personal purpose or purpose?

2. The phenomenon of self-referentiality (I hope you have understood correctly) that you mention regarding the nature of the subject suffering from ED or SD, seems to be a sufficient reason for you to remove this kind of patient from the field of injections. That is, it would seem that you (I understand that this is only a forum) makes an abstract or theoretical division between patients in the realm of the trt itself and patients with emotional problems immersed in the self-referential dynamics that you aptly describe. But this division, from what criterion arises in practice? Will it be from a criterion that gives primacy to sexuality both genital and emotionally? Or is it only genital? (Apparently because if this was your answer, you would also have to consider the raw emotional factor in your answer, without academic statements, since you know perfectly well that each drug has an idiosyncrasy and therefore an associated emotional content ).
3. I am interested to know your proposal or the bottom line that you handle, due to the reasons given in the previous question.

4. Do not misunderstand me I am also an idiot, but sometimes your proposals sound like trt is a "sectarian question". In Chile, the only solution available, in general, is viagra or injection.
Thank you.

Come on Jim, dont be shy man.

"Objective itself" isnt an argue,in this context.

Tell us your basis,your pre scientist truth.

Thanks.
 
This is not me My God.

Hello??? Im DDP not OP, "smartass".

Seriously,dont play games with me,you will always lose. :)

NO SHIT SHERLOCK! Nobody is talking about you. This is about OP!

You just lost against yourself in reading COMPREHENSION! Enjoy arguing with yourself all day.
 
I was on psych meds... since I was 18 and never experienced problems. I think the problem was specifically a new one I had tried with bad sides. This was discussed much earlier in the comments and Jim just didn't read into into. Not a big deal

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
I was on psych meds... since I was 18 and never experienced problems. I think the problem was specifically a new one I had tried with bad sides. This was discussed much earlier in the comments and Jim just didn't read into into. Not a big deal

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

I would have to agree with that is most likely your issue. The change in meds and your brain is still trying to find "homeostasis".

I have dealt with anxiety and have had to take meds for it in the past.

High anxiety = ED
Psych meds = ED

I cured my anxiety and my ED by learning different coping skills other than taking a pill.

A simple joint and meditation do wonders more than those crazy pills that sent me to the ER for withdrawals :confused:.
 
@Sdryx:

I asked Jim a question and I hope he answers. Then your message appeared and I believed, mistakenly, that you were the leader of this new discussion. I understood that the OP solved their problems on the previous page. Do not talk to me about understanding, because your posts are not frank. And if you want to help scientifically you will have to be frank, honest and stop writing in capital letters, my
paranoid and vulgar friend

.
 
Hello Jim, very interesting your answer. It is not my idea to seems offensive to your answer, but I would like to make some small criticisms of a practical nature.

1. Do you have any proposal of meaning or purpose that you could share? Or what is your personal purpose or purpose?

2. The phenomenon of self-referentiality (I hope you have understood correctly) that you mention regarding the nature of the subject suffering from ED or SD, seems to be a sufficient reason for you to remove this kind of patient from the field of injections. That is, it would seem that you (I understand that this is only a forum) makes an abstract or theoretical division between patients in the realm of the trt itself and patients with emotional problems immersed in the self-referential dynamics that you aptly describe. But this division, from what criterion arises in practice? Will it be from a criterion that gives primacy to sexuality both genital and emotionally? Or is it only genital? (Apparently because if this was your answer, you would also have to consider the raw emotional factor in your answer, without academic statements, since you know perfectly well that each drug has an idiosyncrasy and therefore an associated emotional content ).
3. I am interested to know your proposal or the bottom line that you handle, due to the reasons given in the previous question.

4. Do not misunderstand me I am also an idiot, but sometimes your proposals sound like trt is a "sectarian question". In Chile, the only solution available, in general, is viagra or injection.
Thank you.

Come on Jim, dont be shy man.

"Objective itself" isnt an argue,in this context.

Tell us your basis,your pre scientist truth.

Thank you.
 
For all the ignorants in the matter. Avoid assigning personal interpretations to biological phenomena. This however is not wrong but does not allow to overcome broscience in terms of a universal understanding. So if you do not know about epistemology or arguments and fallacies, just humbly comment your opinion. Using quotation marks does not increase the validity of your argument, nor does it detract from it. It simply shows that you do broscience.Period.
 
I would have to agree with that is most likely your issue. The change in meds and your brain is still trying to find "homeostasis".

I have dealt with anxiety and have had to take meds for it in the past.

High anxiety = ED
Psych meds = ED

I cured my anxiety and my ED by learning different coping skills other than taking a pill.

A simple joint and meditation do wonders more than those crazy pills that sent me to the ER for withdrawals :confused:.
a simple joint haha. Ofcourse you do understand the effect of cannabis on the sex drive and endocrine system? LOL
 
Guys guys guys... I think we are making a mistake that just because Jim has "dr" in front of his name means he is obligated to answer questions promptly and in a professional matter. He does not practice here, it's only a forum. Is he a dick all the time? Possibly, but it really doesn't matter because at the end of the day, he's just another guy on the Internet.

I found that taking my questions to multiple sources (forums) ensures I get answers much more efficiently. And for the love of God try your best to not take things like this personally, or you will never find the answers you're looking for. This is objective remember.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
Haha well said Sean. He clearly gave you advice not to squeeze your nips, I just wanted to know why. I was curious he can jog on it's absolutely fine. I've learnt more through my own trials and error than any one man has told me so it's riiiiight haha.
 
Well I think there is potential for small amount to of liquid to come out due to squeezing them hard enough for white blood cells to break.. something along those lines. I thought my case was a bit more than that, but I also have to take into account my susceptibility to neurosis around these issues lol.

Still, having said that, I'm going to get more detailed bloods done, as well as explore the SSRI related side of things. I'm pretty sure time will be suffice to heal all things, especially since I'm hormonally balanced (so it seems) but I'd like to know what's going on. That's just who I am. I want to know how the engine works and what is happening with every piece.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top