Btw, It seems that in this thread the starting point is Jesus in me, I hope those letters are not the acronym of Dr Jim, Hahah. Well I have very clear that I am not the op, but I would like to make a small and honest comment. My scientific hypothesis to prove serious: It seems that the trt and the standards that we have of the sexuality have relation with what we consider a normal sexuality. Now, you can call me ignorant, but I do not know many cases of trt that come from family men. It seems that we were discussing how to become a "ferocious wolf" with women. Basically a perspective of sexuality that seems to me individualistic and that I associate in general with the male chauvinist or oppressor of women (well, not just me, quite a few Current sexologists focused on normal sexuality). Believe me or not, when I had sex with beautiful women a great aspect that I saw at that moment as important was the subject of increased sensory perception, what we commonly call sensuality. The penetration evidently has the place that it has, but I'm not really worried about pretending to be a sexual machine. I do not worry about my wood every morning, even though I have it a couple of times a week. That is why for me the values associated with sexuality should be the starting point of all serious discussion. And this is what raises me suspicion regarding the rate of stating the phrase "emotional problem". Emotional problems exist but not we must subjectivize, in this case, problems that come from false social demands. False demands that are commonly believed and accepted by aspirational children or by very religious subjects such as opusdei who need martyrdom to feel good apparently (the case of injecting testosterone as has been described in this same forum, quite a few users said that it is not really about To feel good and ridicule the opposite). A parent of a certain forum (works as a creator of music for TV, I have it as a contact on my soundcloud page) he said, on the subject of these issues: does not it seem disagreeable to walk with libido always at maximum? I mean that you can only have sex with sex and not even focus on your work. There is a theme of idiosyncrasy that must be discussed. And please do not hide either the objectivity of science or broscience, both are obstacles to consciously take responsibility for our choices.
Regs.
