Info: 35+ years, 173 cm, 86 kg and between 8/10% bf, training for almost 20 years and did less than 5 blast cycles in my life (all with basic shit like only test or test deca), been blasting and recovering but last summer i decided to blast and cruise the last years of my "youth" before going on full TRT when ill be like 40+ and stop blasting.
my serious first cycle was the last summer with
16 weeks
600 test e
400 mast
200 deca
i did pretty good and gained a lot of weight (from 79 to almost 89) staying pretty lean but i had really high E2 (but i had no symptoms), so i was pretty sure to change a bit since i did good and thought to remove the Deca (since i don't want any 19-nor for personal reasons) and add 200 Primo to see if could replace the AI i took to lower the E2.
so the next bulk cycle would be
500 test e
400 mast
200 primo
now here it is the problem, talking to a pro coach here he told me there are better compound than mast to build muscle while on bulk exluding Deca etc that i don't want to take. He said tha Eq is a better option but i read here a LOT of topics and im really confused since someone hate EQ some other love it and same thing for Mast.
Would a cycle with Test Eq and Primo be objectively (like scientific data) better for building muscle on bulk?
Like for example
600 test e
600 Eq
200 primo
or even remove primo from the equation in this case.
On cruise i run just 200 mg test c and i retain like 90% of gains i made (not counting water and fat).
All other things like workout and diet are on check since im not a newbie on things that are not PEDs
my serious first cycle was the last summer with
16 weeks
600 test e
400 mast
200 deca
i did pretty good and gained a lot of weight (from 79 to almost 89) staying pretty lean but i had really high E2 (but i had no symptoms), so i was pretty sure to change a bit since i did good and thought to remove the Deca (since i don't want any 19-nor for personal reasons) and add 200 Primo to see if could replace the AI i took to lower the E2.
so the next bulk cycle would be
500 test e
400 mast
200 primo
now here it is the problem, talking to a pro coach here he told me there are better compound than mast to build muscle while on bulk exluding Deca etc that i don't want to take. He said tha Eq is a better option but i read here a LOT of topics and im really confused since someone hate EQ some other love it and same thing for Mast.
Would a cycle with Test Eq and Primo be objectively (like scientific data) better for building muscle on bulk?
Like for example
600 test e
600 Eq
200 primo
or even remove primo from the equation in this case.
On cruise i run just 200 mg test c and i retain like 90% of gains i made (not counting water and fat).
All other things like workout and diet are on check since im not a newbie on things that are not PEDs
