Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Literally I was just thinking, thank you for @lightspanDear Good Lord and the Baby Jesus,
Thank you for bringing Mr. @lightspan back to us...
Amen,
Jfiddyone3
You had a response typed up but can see everyone has made up their mind? You sound like every other whiny little bitchy UGL on here complaining about their potential customers calling them out on legitimate claims, and then having no appropriate answer to respond with... Typical as fuck. Get over yourself and explain it and do what you claim you came here to do. How about just for fun, you upload these supposed "Mass Specs" you claim to have and let us take a look at them. I'll call bullshit on those right now those too
You slicked up the intro. Now we're getting past the polish.
You told who you had a pack seized a long time ago? I'm confused, but I'm easily confused by shit that makes no sense, so humor me and explain your UGL history and enlighten my dumb ass. Or is this like the MS question I posed, which you won't answer because you "don't see the point?" I didn't ask you to evaluate the merits of the fucking question, try answering it.
Go piss up a rope. Once outside your carefully pre-prepared script, things are going pear-shaped rather quickly. I'm actually the nice guy on the welcoming committee, prepare for ass raping by those less politely inclined. Bite the pillow, they're going in dry.
^^^^ I agree with this ....there arent bad labs , just bad powder sources . And theres not one lab here or been here that didnt have bad batches . I respect that you pulled bad gear from your line , lots of bunk test prop out there (as well as others)
Its still hard to believe this your first rodeo , you seem to know too much about this business (and Meso) to be a rookie . Time will tell......~Ogh
What's your other handle here on Meso and other boards? Stop fuckin around
Send them to me
Cycle starts in two wewks
Dude read what he wrote previously. He already answered this question twice.Pics?? Do you have any shills of a payer representative thats gonna chime n here soon and tell us how ohh soo good this gear is
DO NOT RUSH THE TESTING
@thane .... Did I miss the pics of your lab set up/equipment? Did you address this already?
Dude read what he wrote previously. He already answered this question twice.
Alright I see your points. I think others were trying to make one along similar lines but it got a bit lost in translation. I wasn't interpreting those complaints as legitimate and they were. My apologies for not reading into things enough. I'll try to address everyone's concerns here because I believe being honest is the best way to operate.
I'll try to address the MS topic to the extent I can with my limited knowledge. I don't mean to patronize those who already know these things, likely even better than I do, so don't be offended. I'm just trying to explain the value even with their inaccuracy. The only way to ACCURATELY quantify a compound of unknown purity is to have a reference standard of known purity. Period. This is the problem we face. Without a DEA license and whatever else would be needed analysts that are willing to test really anything you send them for a cash payment simply don't have access to these standards. Without calibrated reference standards the results are just an estimate. MY results are just estimates.... BUT these estimates are still extremely useful and at least in the case of relatively pure/clean samples pretty reasonably accurate. The less pure the larger the margin for error.... obviously.
I'll try to demonstrate the value here. As I mentioned I do not have Test Propionate in stock right now because the sample was contaminated. I didn't mention this, but I also do not have Anadrol in stock because both suppliers I have tried came back as BUNK. Now, the mass spec still gave me a purity estimate on the Test P. It was a shitty result, but a result nonetheless. The LABMAX on the raw material was a perfect clean reaction. However, when LABMAX was performed on the finished product it was all screwed up just as I suspected it might be - testing positive for what looks to be clomiphene.... yes seriously. Impurities are typically byproducts from the manufacturing process itself. You never achieve a 100% yield in chemistry. You have a theoretical yield and an an actual yield. You can also get stereoisomers of the compound that are not functional or biologically active. When this is the case you typically, and I'm not an expert here so don't crucify me if this isn't 100%, see the major impurities register at a similar molecular weight as the target ion. These are normal impurities and not contaminants.... like large amounts of organic solvents or whatever the hell else China manages to screw up would be. Again I'm not an expert this is just based on the dozens of results I've seen. In the case of this contaminated test P..... there are significant peaks in the 261-275 range and also 422-427 range. For the last time - I am NOT an expert.... but common sense told me this was a contaminated sample because of this. Clomiphene has a molecular weight of about 406 so I guess it makes sense that the stanozol/oxandrolone LABMAX test showed the dark brown to black result for clomiphene. I don't know what the hell the 261-275 contaminant is but nonetheless the ampule A and B LABMAX result showed something like you would expect for Masteron Enan, despite there being no Mast E actually present. Golden-yellow under UV light, orange for amp A, orange-red for amp B.
So my points really are:
1) These mass specs DO prevent bunk, underdosed, or contaminated gear from making it to the customer!
2) They are not completely accurate! I do not intend to argue with anyone about what was said above because something was almost definitely wrong. I admit this. I am not an Analytical Chemist, but when you see significant peaks showing up in the complete wrong places that seems like an issue to me. In the case of this Test P for example, obvious contamination.
3) I really have no desire to use mass specs as a selling point! I can't prove their legitimacy and in fact know they are inherently flawed. It's just an estimate. That being said, they are still extremely useful and protect the end user from contaminated or bunk gear.
4) Most analysts willing to test give horrible results. Most labs seems to tell you everything is above 90%+ pure as long as they are able to isolate the target ion..... it took several months and a lot of testing to find the analyst I use currently who I believe is competent.
These MS tests are just a tool. They aren't perfect and would be considered erroneous in any serious academic setting, but it does protect the end user a great deal. They also seem to be quite accurate when we're talking 80%+ purity, at least judging from my own bloodwork. This is why I make the claim that the products I sell are very close to being accurately dosed, I truly believe this to be true from my own labs and cycling experience. I've put quite a lot of money up for bloodwork to show MESO this as well.
If I had been a source 10 times before I'd have a lot better explanation than this lined up lol. Hopefully this helps explain my position.
I am willing to talk in private to trusted members about how to find analysts. It isn't all that difficult, but it is EXPENSIVE and time consuming. I spent several months and several grand. You will waste money on many idiots before hopefully finding someone who is competent.
Nope!! A couple of burners,beekers, and whatman filters isn't really pic worthy!
Understood.I actually sent it way b4 he posted and b due to the lack of service it posted late. Lets focus on the task at hand here my bad