The Lobster International, US and EU Domestic HGH, PEPTIDES and Turkish Pharmacy

[TheLobster]

I'm just wondering if you have an established timeline for the testing of the no vacuum vials? My vials have no vacuum and it almost seems like they have positive pressure making it difficult to introduce the bac water. Maybe I need to vent the vial while mixing the bac water, but I hate adding extra steps. I read/saw earlier about someone experiencing solution escaping after drawing their dose; I have experienced this too with these vials and can only assume it is from the pressure in the vial.

If water is spraying out when pulling back the needle after adding it to the vial, it’s simply due to incorrect technique. I’ve already shown that person how to do it properly with a video. I can also show you the correct way to add water to an HGH vial,just message me on Telegram.It seems you dont know how to add water. There is absolutely no way that there is positive pressure in the vial. When you insert a needle into a sealed vial and add 1 ml of water, the syringe will naturally resist. that’s basic physics. We call **Pressure**

You keep bringing this up over and over again.Contact me via Telegram or email, and I’ll refund your payment.

Right now, I don’t have any HGH vials without a vacuum. I have set aside 20 vials for testing. I will conduct tests at 6 months and 12 months. I’m doing this solely to show the people here

 

[Var1]

Lobster order arrived safely as normal today, 8 days from order to my doorstep, uk .

 

[readalot]

I'm just wondering if you have an established timeline for the testing of the no vacuum vials? My vials have no vacuum and it almost seems like they have positive pressure making it difficult to introduce the bac water. Maybe I need to vent the vial while mixing the bac water, but I hate adding extra steps. I read/saw earlier about someone experiencing solution escaping after drawing their dose; I have experienced this too with these vials and can only assume it is from the pressure in the vial.

Do you understand proper technique for reconstituting a vial?

Good demo of the pressure nuance with 10 ml of liquid. I don't like the jet he's putting straight on the puck. I turn the vial on its side and slowly add the liquid to the wall. No foam and no bubbles. Gently. You've got to equalize the pressure.

 

[readalot]

If water is spraying out when pulling back the needle after adding it to the vial, it’s simply due to incorrect technique. I’ve already shown that person how to do it properly with a video. I can also show you the correct way to add water to an HGH vial,just message me on Telegram.It seems you dont know how to add water. There is absolutely no way that there is positive pressure in the vial. When you insert a needle into a sealed vial and add 1 ml of water, the syringe will naturally resist. that’s basic physics. We call **Pressure**

You keep bringing this up over and over again.Contact me via Telegram or email, and I’ll refund your payment.

Right now, I don’t have any HGH vials without a vacuum. I have set aside 20 vials for testing. I will conduct tests at 6 months and 12 months. I’m doing this solely to show the people here

You can ignore me all you want but you are doing a great job with the testing. Thank you.

 

[chumpsickel]

Do you understand proper technique for reconstituting a vial?

Good demo of the pressure nuance with 10 ml of liquid. I don't like the jet he's putting straight on the puck. I turn the vial on its side and slowly add the liquid to the wall. No foam and no bubbles. Gently. You've got to equalize the pressure.

I'm sure my technique could be critiqued and I believe I am doing it the way you describe, but I've never had to vent a vial to get the bac water in. I certainly understand how pressure works and if there is a vacuum applied to my vials, it is miniscule.

 

[readalot]

I'm sure my technique could be critiqued and I believe I am doing it the way you describe, but I've never had to vent a vial to get the bac water in. I certainly understand how pressure works and if there is a vacuum applied to my vials, it is miniscule.

Just checking. Thanks for your observations. Should be noticeable if there is a vacuum to your point.

 

[chumpsickel]

I contacted @TheLobster about a refund. He wants me to ship the unused vials to some address and then he will refund. I will just do my own testing on these vials and report back. They are currently stored in the refrigerator. I have some other hgh I have been using; I was just excited to try some of what I assumed would be better quality. We shall see.

 

[glpfun]

I contacted @TheLobster about a refund. He wants me to ship the unused vials to some address and then he will refund. I will just do my own testing on these vials and report back. They are currently stored in the refrigerator. I have some other hgh I have been using; I was just excited to try some of what I assumed would be better quality. We shall see.

Where does quality come into play when the only issue is you don’t know how to reconstitute peptides properly.

 

[chumpsickel]

Where does quality come into play when the only issue is you don’t know how to reconstitute peptides properly.

You can go back and read the thread to see what the concerns would be with a lack of vacuum. As stated, I have never had a problem with reconstituting other peptides. It is really not rocket science.

 

[Ghoul]

I contacted @TheLobster about a refund. He wants me to ship the unused vials to some address and then he will refund. I will just do my own testing on these vials and report back. They are currently stored in the refrigerator. I have some other hgh I have been using; I was just excited to try some of what I assumed would be better quality. We shall see.

Nothing wrong with your technique, for vials with proper vacuum, they can pull 3ml of BAC. For vials filled with air, you either need a vent pin or suck air out first, inject some BAC, the suck more air out, inject more BAC, etc.

Where does quality come into play when the only issue is you don’t know how to reconstitute peptides properly.

No one should have to know how to reconstitute UGL vials lacking vacuum. Oxidized rHGH is damaged, and without vacuum, the sterility of the vial should be assumed lost as well.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

I contacted @TheLobster about a refund. He wants me to ship the unused vials to some address and then he will refund. I will just do my own testing on these vials and report back. They are currently stored in the refrigerator. I have some other hgh I have been using; I was just excited to try some of what I assumed would be better quality. We shall see.

If you are gonna test non vacuumed hgh. Ill throw down to grab some real data rather than some jerk off spitting off nonsense online

 

[chumpsickel]

If you are gonna test non vacuumed hgh. Ill throw down to grab some real data rather than some jerk off spitting off nonsense online

Sounds good @Spaceman Spiff . I placed my order in January, so I will send a vial to Janoshik in April.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Sounds good @Spaceman Spiff . I placed my order in January, so I will send a vial to Janoshik in April.

Dm me. I wonder if @janoshik will allow me to send for part of the balance

 

[TheLobster]

Nothing wrong with your technique, for vials with proper vacuum, they can pull 3ml of BAC. For vials filled with air, you either need a vent pin or suck air out first, inject some BAC, the suck more air out, inject more BAC, etc.

No one should have to know how to reconstitute UGL vials lacking vacuum. Oxidized rHGH is damaged, and without vacuum, the sterility of the vial should be assumed lost as well.

What’s your profession? Do you actually work with HGH proteins, or are you just gathering all this information by asking AI? Just wondering. Have you ever done a blind test on HGH yourself?

I see you’re very inquisitive. Would you like to have HGH vials without vacuum tested? With all this knowledge, it wouldn’t make sense not to run a test. Shall we do it?

 

[BamaCrazy]

What’s your profession? Do you actually work with HGH proteins, or are you just gathering all this information by asking AI? Just wondering. Have you ever done a blind test on HGH yourself?

I see you’re very inquisitive. Would you like to have HGH vials without vacuum tested? With all this knowledge, it wouldn’t make sense not to run a test. Shall we do it?

Now things are getting interesting. Let’s do some testing!

 

[Ghoul]

If you are gonna test non vacuumed hgh. Ill throw down to grab some real data rather than some jerk off spitting off nonsense online

LOL.

Don't forget to ask Jano to test immediately after reconstitution, and then a couple of weeks after, exposing it to room temps for some amount of time to simulate real world use,

Because the dozens of studies on rHGH oxidation show that oxygen not only directly damages the GH monomers, making them inactive, but they become physically unstable, causing aggregates to form, with exponentially more undamaged rHGH being wasted in the formation of balls of useless GH.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0939641113001045?via%3Dihub

Don't forget the sterility test as well, since Jano's found more than 1 in 20 peptide samples fail that test. Obviously if a seal failed, sucking in air, that could easily be a cause of contamination.

Just so you don't waste your money on testing "nonsense".

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

LOL.

Don't forget to ask Jano to test immediately after reconstitution, and then a couple of weeks after, exposing it to room temps for some amount of time to simulate real world use,

Because the dozens of studies on rHGH oxidation show that oxygen not only directly damages the GH monomers, making them inactive, but they become physically unstable, causing aggregates to form, with exponentially more undamaged rHGH being wasted in the formation of these balls useless GH.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0939641113001045?via%3Dihub

Don't forget the sterility test as well, since Jano's found more than 1 in 20 peptide samples fail that test. Obviously if a seal failed, sucking in air, that could easily be a cause of contamination.

Just so you don't waste your money on testing "nonsense".

You are saying it's damaged. We are looking for degradation alone from not having a vacuum.

It should show low purity and higher dimer right after testing


Have you ever paid for actual testing?

 

[Standfast]

Dm me. I wonder if @janoshik will allow me to send for part of the balance

I'll put up on the testing as well.

 

[glpfun]

I suspect lack of vacuum doesn’t necessarily imply oxidation damage especially if properly lyophilized. Unfortunately the linked article has that information gated. Worth testing out.

 

[BamaCrazy]

I suspect there is what you read on the internet and then there is real life. Testing will settle it.