Yes Sir , I understand ,
However, We are testin to see if the HGH is indeed HGH.
Some of us in the community use or possibly abuse AAS and other substances or for some other reason Have poor HGH conversion to IGF-1.
Many have cried that there HGH is poor or underdosed based on a single IGF-1 test, when in fact it is not.
NOW I am NOT say that is always the case , But in some instances People that are not knowin and have not tested themselves and how they react or process HGH under different circumstances just dont know how to read these results or misinterpret them due to lack of Knowledge....
The HGH Serum although very crude and poor at definin quantity is a very good, fast, cheap, way to show that there is HGH in that sample bein used. There is also 1 step removed, we dont need to go through the crapshoot of conversion, Meanin,the test shows the amount of HGH in the Blood at a said amount of time after administration. So manufacture to Vial to Blood to Lab, vs. Manufacture to Vial to Blood through conversion to lab....
Now if our intrest is to test how efficiently our bodys can convert HGH into IGF-1 @ different times and on different compounds, with possibly our livers bein compromised.
So Yes Sir, it is a More reliable test in its raw form used in a controlled group used for which it was intended for. not xactly the way we are tryin to use it.
Then Yr on Doc this would b the preferred test and Yes Sir it could show that the HGh is real, and crudely give us a idea of the amount we are takin provided we know how we react on the same....
Peace
