(To avoid suppressiom) Why does nobody talk about raising endogenous LH and GNRH?

Horror Cock

New Member
There are multiple studies on different prostaglandins similar to this https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0090698076901039

Although the androgenic side effects apply even if the androgens are endogenous, problems like infertility and testicle shrinkage can be avoided. People already went with HCG as a step above exogenous testosterone. It is obvious that HCG replaces LH, therefore gonadotropins fall as much as they would with exogenous testosterone. Quitting HCG you'll still be suppressed afterwards.

Then why not go another step higher and raise endogenous LH? Is it lack of science, or proven side effects, or proven insufficient benefit, or people just don't think about it, or is it proven effective and hidden for some sort of profit selling the strictly regulated testosterone?

Obviously prostaglandins are biologically active in a variety of ways, another prostaglandin was tested for potency in men https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022534717359062
And still it must be not too difficult isolate the GNRH stimulating effect. Any research I may find useful?





Edit: it was discussed by other forums for decades...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top