Trump Timeline ... Trumpocalypse

[xy5jn0]

 

[xy5jn0]

 

[xy5jn0]

https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/tax-cuts-delivering-relief-small-businesses-need/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wh

 

[xy5jn0]

Can't admit this. Doesn't fit the lib narrative. #walkaway

Hardly Anyone Wants to Admit America Is Beating Poverty

 

[Swiper]

i’m just check in for now on for the hot make America great chicks [emoji102]


[emoji631]
[emoji1303]

 

[Michael Scally MD]

 

[Michael Scally MD]

 

[xy5jn0]

Check out @DonaldJTrumpJr’s Tweet:

 

[xy5jn0]

TRUMP FOLLOWS THROUGH: Sanctions On Iran Begin At Midnight

 

[Mister Sandman]

Winning ...

Trump’s tariffs already have made an impact in manufacturing-heavy South Carolina.
Swedish automaker Volvo has said it may have to break its promise to hire 4,000 employees for a new plant in South Carolina. And German automaker BMW recently wrote U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross saying the tariffs could jeopardize 45,000 S.C. jobs, including 10,000 at its Spartanburg plant and 35,000 at BMW suppliers.
- The Herald

 

[Mister Sandman]

Some of President Trump’s most cartoonishly evil policy initiatives have come at the expense of the environment. In the past few months alone, his administration has lifted a ban importing big-game hunting trophies, sought to repeal California emissions standards and released a plan to gut the Endangered Species Act. It’s all done in the name of unmitigated capitalism, to which the president clearly feels the environment is beholden. So too, apparently, is the health of Americans, as the Environmental Protection Agency is now allowing asbestos to be legally used in construction.

On June 1st, the EPA enacted the Significant New Use Rule, which allows the government to evaluate asbestos use on a case-by-case basis. Around the same time, the EPA released a new framework for how it evaluates chemical risk. Not included in the evaluation process are the potential effects of exposure to chemicals in the air, ground or water. It’s as absurd as it sounds. “It is ridiculous,” Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, who recently retired after four decades at the EPA, told theNew York Times. “You can’t determine if there is an unreasonable risk without doing a comprehensive risk evaluation.”

The new evaluation framework is a nifty way for the EPA to circumvent an Obama-era law requiring the EPA to evaluate hundreds of potentially dangerous chemicals. Asbestos is among the first batch of 10 chemicals the EPA will examine, and also one of the most blatantly dangerous to public health. Its use is banned in over 60 countries, and though it is only heavily restricted in the United States, asbestos is no longer used in construction because of the health risks it poses. Direct or indirect exposure to the carcinogen can cause lung cancer and mesothelioma, and it has been found to kill 40,000 Americans annually. The World Health Organization http://www.who.int/ipcs/assessment/public_health/asbestos/en/ that “all types of asbestos cause lung cancer, mesothelioma, cancer of the larynx and ovary, and asbestosis.”

Make Asbestos Great Again! Let’s add pneumoconiosis !

Coal, asbestos... what next? Horses and oil lamps?

MAGA just like the mid-1800 industrial revolution...

 

[xy5jn0]

 

[Michael Scally MD]

 

[Michael Scally MD]

 

[Michael Scally MD]

 

[xy5jn0]

 

[Michael Scally MD]

2017 ...

 

[xy5jn0]

 

[xy5jn0]

 

[Michael Scally MD]