When the US president proposed on Twitter that the November elections should be suspended, he made it clear that the task at hand is to keep him in office some other way.
Given these contradictions, which are no secret to anyone, how did Trump mean for his message to be understood? Trump is not a fool. He knows that he has little chance of winning the election in November by normal means. By sending this message, he is conceding the election to his Democratic rival Joe Biden, and has begun the search for some other way of staying in office. His tweet is intended not for those who disagree with him, but for those are willing to follow him into tyranny.
In his tweet, Trump has made it clear that the task at hand is to keep him in office in some other way than by election. He knows that he lacks the power to delay the election himself. What he is seeking with this tweet are allies in the United States, or for that matter abroad, who will help to create a situation where an election seems impossible.
The tweet of July 30 is thus a turning point. Before that date, Trump supporters could tell themselves that they were involved in a normal presidential campaign. After that date, supporters of Trump must confront his open contention that the election in November will not count. This raises the question of just what it now means to be on the side of the US president. It means, of course, to be against democracy, and in favor of authoritarianism.
Anyone who supports Trump after July 30 has made a moral choice: for a person, and against the American constitution. Everyone who works for Trump’s campaign, donates money to it, or plans to vote for him has been put on notice: they are all now actors in a charade, keeping up appearances until November, providing cover for the real action, which will be somewhere else. Those three question marks at the end of the tweet are a signal that someone should find a non-democratic way of keeping Trump in power. There is notable agreement among American thinkers, from a
leading left-wing public intellectual to a leading right-wing professor of law, that Trump’s tweet was “
fascistic.” I have written in this vein myself. But this may be most profoundly true in a sense that thus far has been overlooked.
As English historian Ian Kershaw showed, the Nazi style was “
working toward the Führer”: understanding a message from a leader not as a series of logical propositions or empirical observations, but as a guide to how the world should be, as a hint as to what followers should do. In this case, the hint is that the elections should be spoiled: a hint that can be taken by Trump’s postmaster general, or by republican state legislatures, or by Americans with guns.
They are unlikely to prevail, however. It has taken a while, but by now many Americans, even if they do not quite understand the deeper meaning of Trump’s style, are aware that they need to be prepared for an election unlike any other. Anyone who tries to do Trump’s bidding and spoil the election will regret it. That is the other meaning of those three question marks: Trump is hoping that someone else will break the law so that he may stay in power, but he has no intention of taking responsibility for what happens next. He will leave it to others to cripple American democracy so that he may live in comfort. If Russia tries this, it will almost certainly face the
full wrath of a Biden administration. If Americans try to “work toward the Führer,” their leader will betray them in the end.
That is the one way in which Trump is perfectly consistent: everything is about him, and everyone is to be sacrificed to him. Unlike the traditional fascists, he dreams of no grand and terrible cause. He simply expects others to suffer on his behalf.