TSL LABS

[T-Bagger]

We've all had some angry sex. Usually its because I say the wrong name

Hate when that happens!

 

[Horimono]

Does it ever bother you knowing that your mom used to do all sorts of freaky stuff? I don't mean with me, I don't know her, I'm sure she was a lovely woman. But just like girls do stuff today to please men, @thetsl your mom did too. Got done doggy style, a little anal, swallowed. Hell, probably even had a lesbian experience, an orgy, or a threesome. This woman who gave birth to you, raised you, loved you actually was doing these things to create you. I wonder what was happening when you were conceived. Did she want a creampie? Did he just not pull out? Did he not have self control? Maybe she was close to cumming and wouldn't let him pull out... Maybe it was just her thing to let dudes jizz in her. Oh well, guess we'll never know (just kidding, ask. Please).

Anywho, have a pleasant evening.

Jesus. Lol

 

[thetsl]

we look forward to hearing you take zero responsibility for any negative result while simultaneously blaming members and discrediting the testing protocol.

I always took full responsibility for anything negative, when evidence substantiated their claims. As I can remember correctly, there were Very few negative results here, countless positive results. Had a couple lower TT results , while their free numbers were still 8-10x higher than normal, and had one lower result on a "controlled" test that was not kept controlled.

It is extremely difficult to take blame for a negative result, when one member posts a positive result on the same batch as someone posts a negative result with. I guess that may be hard for someone to understand, but that is the reality of it. Some just want free items and to publicly bash a lab because their TT may be a little lower than it was 9 months ago on the same dose when the individual has never came off in between. There are many factors that can easily sway the number positively to negatively. I appreciate your feedback however.

 

[Beano223]

I always took full responsibility for anything negative, when evidence substantiated their claims. As I can remember correctly, there were Very few negative results here, countless positive results. Had a couple lower TT results , while their free numbers were still 8-10x higher than normal, and had one lower result on a "controlled" test that was not kept controlled.

It is extremely difficult to take blame for a negative result, when one member posts a positive result on the same batch as someone posts a negative result with. I guess that may be hard for someone to understand, but that is the reality of it. Some just want free items and to publicly bash a lab because their TT may be a little lower than it was 9 months ago on the same dose when the individual has never came off in between. There are many factors that can easily sway the number positively to negatively. I appreciate your feedback however.

Stop arguing with people Bro. How many times are you gonna be called unprofessional for arguing with people then you continue to argue. We all get it blah blah total test blah blah free test. Blah blah controlled test that wasn't controlled because he added something else in. Just ensure people you'll handle things differently moving forward and handle your business

 

[Tj72]

I will say that atleast for the moment you seem to be handling things more humbly than before @thetsl ....could be a good thing and the norm for the future

 

[thetsl]

I do not feel it's arguing at all. I responded with a professional answer, that was all.

I actually have several members ignored so I do not see their messages at all. I feel that is the best thing to do as well.

 

[JJ408G]

@thetsl are you still charging shipping

 

[Johne71]

Having batches submitted to @Analyzer will be the best test any lab can be given. In my opinion blood work is best to see how each individual is responding and how they should continue their protocol with any particular labs products. A test showing contents are accurately dosed and contaminant free will be better than knowing how well someone responds.

 

[insertnamehere]

I do not feel it's arguing at all. I responded with a professional answer, that was all.

I actually have several members ignored so I do not see their messages at all. I feel that is the best thing to do as well.

Yeah, you're right, you're not argumentative at all

Have you ever heard of constructive criticism? Having those members on ignore contradicts your statements about improvement (yet again). Meaning, your worst critics can sometimes give you the most beneficial feedback. By ignoring them, you're essentially saying that you don't need to improve in those areas. This action (ignoring) contradicts your promise to address your faults and make the appropriate changes.

Subtle discrepancies between words and action such as the above are strong indicators you have no intention to make meaningful improvements. This "comeback" is just but a flash in the pan and soon you'll be back to business as usual.

 

[Horimono]

Having batches submitted to @Analyzer will be the best test any lab can be given. In my opinion blood work is best to see how each individual is responding and how they should continue their protocol with any particular labs products. A test showing contents are accurately dosed and contaminant free will be better than knowing how well someone responds.

I completely agree with this. Everyone responds differently. There are a lot of variables that could potentially change TT numbers. Although if one were to score a certain number on pharma test, then months later on an UGL test product, if nothing else changed the numbers should be pretty damn close. Same pinning schedule. Same blood draw schedule. No additional compounds etc.

As far as Analyzer is concerned, I don't think he is testing for any bacteriological contaminants. Just contents and concentration. At least that's what I was told by another member who paid to have a compound tested by him.

 

[TSud]

Yeah, you're right, you're not argumentative at all

Have you ever heard of constructive criticism? Having those members on ignore contradicts your statements about improvement (yet again). Meaning, your worst critics can sometimes give you the most beneficial feedback. By ignoring them, you're essentially saying that you don't need to improve in those areas. This action (ignoring) contradicts your promise to address your faults and make the appropriate changes.

Subtle discrepancies between words and action such as the above are strong indicators you have no intention to make meaningful improvements. This "comeback" is just but a flash in the pan and soon you'll be back to business as usual.

While I understand what your sayng and the point that your trying to make I also understand him putting 1 or 2 members/ ex-members on ignore. Constructive criticism and feed back is one thing but people like cdnguy and justfish our something totally different. I wouldn't blame anyone, including there own mom, for putting them on ignore.

 

[jaymaximus]

While I understand what your sayng and the point that your trying to make I also understand him putting 1 or 2 members/ ex-members on ignore. Constructive criticism and feed back is one thing but people like cdnguy and justfish our something totally different. I wouldn't blame anyone, including there own mom, for putting them on ignore.

Go back and look at the very first introduction post, the lab claims they are here because they respect Meso's "ruthless nature".

But like EVERYTHING else they've done, that was just talk.

Now we can't blame them anymore though. TSL has shown who they are and if people still purchase its on them.

Those who don't learn from history...

 

[insertnamehere]

While I understand what your sayng and the point that your trying to make I also understand him putting 1 or 2 members/ ex-members on ignore. Constructive criticism and feed back is one thing but people like cdnguy and justfish our something totally different. I wouldn't blame anyone, including there own mom, for putting them on ignore.

I highly doubt he meant cdnguy and justfish exclusively since he said several members are on ignore and those members have not been active here lately, not to mention their online personas are outliers so they cannot be extrapolated and used to generalize the greater population here. Additionally, there have been numerous posts with substantive and legitimate criticisms that have been repeatedly ignored.

 

[Savagesteve]

I highly doubt he meant cdnguy and justfish exclusively since he said several members are on ignore and those members have not been active here lately, not to mention their online personas are outliers so they cannot be extrapolated and used to generalize the greater population here. Additionally, there have been numerous posts with substantive and legitimate criticisms that have been repeatedly ignored.

They haven't been active because they both got banned.

 

[Kakarot]

Go back and look at the very first introduction post, the lab claims they are here because they respect Meso's "ruthless nature".

But like EVERYTHING else they've done, that was just talk.

Now we can't blame them anymore though. TSL has shown who they are and if people still purchase its on them.

Those who don't learn from history...

They're not going to just listen to some "member" now maybe if you were "awesome" he'd give you a free bottle of test and a dick pic

 

[Apexvallen]

DickPicLabs. 10% off every order if you send pics. Must be full frontal meat spin.

 

[AIRBORNE DADDY]

DickPicLabs. 10% off every order if you send pics. Must be full frontal meat spin.

 

[AIRBORNE DADDY]

 

[MisterSuperGod]

 

[thetsl]

I highly doubt he meant cdnguy and justfish exclusively since he said several members are on ignore and those members have not been active here lately, not to mention their online personas are outliers so they cannot be extrapolated and used to generalize the greater population here. Additionally, there have been numerous posts with substantive and legitimate criticisms that have been repeatedly ignored.

The one I was referring to that is on ignore is the one who bad mouthed my mother who passed away a year ago after she fought for her life for months battling brain cancer. I chose the higher path of ignoring him rather than really telling him how I felt. It only shows the childishness of someone to speak about anyone's family member, much less someone's mother who passed away recently From a horrible life ending cancer.

I do not feel that's out of line in the LEAST blocking someone. I'm sure anyone would feel the same way if someone spoke on one of your dead family members in that manner.