That news article is more propoganda then news in my opinion. *Of course* there are chemicals delivered to the unborn baby. There are chemicals in our environment and in our bodies; there is no dispute about that. Why would anyone think that the unborn baby is immune to such?
Useful information would be not the number of chemicals but the how *much* of each chemical was found, with particular notice to levels that are high enough to be alarming.
Even better would be if somebody could propose practical and resonable solutions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
