US: WARNING - UGL GLP users should act quickly

lol or ur pocket book... or freedom of speech incarcerating a AMERICAN citizen for a PEACEFUL protest... THATS INSANE.. esp I care about free speech. free people who beat cops, arrest university student with no involvement in any terrorist etc..and broke 0 laws, makes sense.. just for saying please gov dont bomb a whole country and kill children.

401k on track to loose 15-20% by years end, AND everything is going to get 20% more expensive in USA. enter project 2025, destroy middle class.

but yes he really is into isolationism now cause of vance, and even Ben Shapiro thinks trump is off his rocker, even though trump has vowed to take over Gaza with black rock...

republics are always less free, and infact there is no instance of it working well.. unless u choose to live in Poland or china over Sweden or Denmark?
“Republics are always less free”….uhm, than what? A communist/marxist state? Than a monarch? Are you suggesting than a true democracy? You think people feel that a democracy is ‘more free’ when 51% of the population outvotes and controls the 49% on everything, for years maybe, because they are the ‘majority’? Do you think half of that population feels like they could ever have a say in their government at all?

What are you suggesting is more free than a republic?

And…republics don’t work very well? I’d have to know what your idea of ‘very well’ means but unless all it means to you is ‘longest lasting’ form of government, then I would argue that the republic is the best system of government and works well in every modern country using it. Democracy on the other hand, as well as all forms of socialism, has never worked well, generally speaking.

The problem with our republic and most republics, is we start running them like a socialist state instead of running them like a republic, and then we bog ourselves down with big government…this agency and that agency to regulate this and that, apart from congress, and all these departments and time they waste costs a magnificent amount of money. And we have a social program for absolutely everything and that costs a magnificent amount of money. And then the populace doesn’t know anything about history and begins to become socialist, about half of the population… and they have no idea what that would mean for them and if not for them than their grandchildren… and these people make it impossible for unity and try to tare down the fabric of the scientific realities of our universe and try and block in congress every good thing that makes a republic successful and strong…. Well that’s the only problem with republics that I see
 
And then the populace doesn’t know anything about history and begins to become socialist, about half of the population… and they have no idea what that would mean for them and if not for them than their grandchildren… and these people make it impossible for unity
...can anyone think of a single moment in the history of the USA when unity has been an actual thing? Don't tell me the socialists have been ruining all of the fun for the past 250 years. So has this republic you're picturing ever truly existed?
And yeah there's a political discourse channel on this site for a reason.
We all know this isn't a conversation that's going anywhere anyways.
Everybody stfu.
 
“Republics are always less free”….uhm, than what? A communist/marxist state? Than a monarch? Are you suggesting than a true democracy? You think people feel that a democracy is ‘more free’ when 51% of the population outvotes and controls the 49% on everything, for years maybe, because they are the ‘majority’? Do you think half of that population feels like they could ever have a say in their government at all?

What are you suggesting is more free than a republic?

And…republics don’t work very well? I’d have to know what your idea of ‘very well’ means but unless all it means to you is ‘longest lasting’ form of government, then I would argue that the republic is the best system of government and works well in every modern country using it. Democracy on the other hand, as well as all forms of socialism, has never worked well, generally speaking.

The problem with our republic and most republics, is we start running them like a socialist state instead of running them like a republic, and then we bog ourselves down with big government…this agency and that agency to regulate this and that, apart from congress, and all these departments and time they waste costs a magnificent amount of money. And we have a social program for absolutely everything and that costs a magnificent amount of money. And then the populace doesn’t know anything about history and begins to become socialist, about half of the population… and they have no idea what that would mean for them and if not for them than their grandchildren… and these people make it impossible for unity and try to tare down the fabric of the scientific realities of our universe and try and block in congress every good thing that makes a republic successful and strong…. Well that’s the only problem with republics that I see
nope just DEMOCRACIES are better than republic..

thought experiment time! would u rather live in Poland or Denmark? china or Sweden? Costa Rica or Congo? u see now? USSR or Greenland? now u see? REPUBLICS ARE LESS FREE.. its not a debatable thing!!!

lol has not generally worked well?? are u on drugs my son? you mean the places with the freest people happiest AND healthiest people isn't working? LOL.. u gotta actually critically think and not parrot nonsense.
 
nope just DEMOCRACIES are better than republic..

thought experiment time! would u rather live in Poland or Denmark? china or Sweden? Costa Rica or Congo? u see now? USSR or Greenland? now u see? REPUBLICS ARE LESS FREE.. its not a debatable thing!!!

lol has not generally worked well?? are u on drugs my son? you mean the places with the freest people happiest AND healthiest people isn't working? LOL.. u gotta actually critically think and not parrot nonsense.
This is not a battle you can win. Hard cooked emotion-cum-opinion vs anecdotes and examples far removed from those you argue with.
It's like when people rail against everything as big government and prefer govt be limited. I keep wondering if they really mean that, or they just mean I don't like it when 'we' don't control the govt.
People need to live in administrations where police and fire services are PAYG, you get your own water, take care of your own sewage, repair your own roads, partly fund utility repairs, and pay minimal taxes, (save for property taxes) and instead pay a lot of VAT.
Anyway, was trying not to get drawn into another political argument.
It's just annoying waiting for HYB, SRY and SSA packages, while hoping against hope that Tracy ships reta promo.
 
The problem with our republic and most republics, is we start running them like a socialist state instead of running them like a republic, and then we bog ourselves down with big government…this agency and that agency to regulate this and that, apart from congress, and all these departments and time they waste costs a magnificent amount of money. And we have a social program for absolutely everything and that costs a magnificent amount of money. And then the populace doesn’t know anything about history and begins to become socialist, about half of the population… and they have no idea what that would mean for them and if not for them than their grandchildren… and these people make it impossible for unity and try to tare down the fabric of the scientific realities of our universe and try and block in congress every good thing that makes a republic successful and strong…. Well that’s the only problem with republics that I see
just as a side note, did you know communist countries were actually republics?? just a little FYI. guess what Charlie clark has been lying to u...

also have you learned about your founding fathers and how they set up gov? do you know reasons why the set it up like that? because they KNEW absolute power corrupts and checks and balances although at times are not perfect. the alternative is dictatorships and oligarchs which is why your ancestors left Europe in the first place..

anyhoo, hoped you learned something!!!

Charlie kick-autistic powers
ben Shapiro- autistic powers
elon musk - autistic super powers
hitlers scientists developed/found autism...

you see a pattern? while nothing wrong with autism per say I find it super fascinating how the bro movement is attracted to autistic people when majority of people they dislike ie trans people are autistic aswell. is it because they know how to trick uneducated people? or actually just lack of emotions that makes them so appealing. are autistic folks taking over the world on both sides of the isle???
 
...can anyone think of a single moment in the history of the USA when unity has been an actual thing? Don't tell me the socialists have been ruining all of the fun for the past 250 years. So has this republic you're picturing ever truly existed?
And yeah there's a political discourse channel on this site for a reason.
We all know this isn't a conversation that's going anywhere anyways.
Everybody stfu.
I merely replied to clear headed or whatever his name is. He is the one who began the political bullshit. Quote him with your ‘stfu’ reply
 
just as a side note, did you know communist countries were actually republics?? just a little FYI. guess what Charlie clark has been lying to u...

also have you learned about your founding fathers and how they set up gov? do you know reasons why the set it up like that? because they KNEW absolute power corrupts and checks and balances although at times are not perfect. the alternative is dictatorships and oligarchs which is why your ancestors left Europe in the first place..

anyhoo, hoped you learned something!!!

Charlie kick-autistic powers
ben Shapiro- autistic powers
elon musk - autistic super powers
hitlers scientists developed/found autism...

you see a pattern? while nothing wrong with autism per say I find it super fascinating how the bro movement is attracted to autistic people when majority of people they dislike ie trans people are autistic aswell. is it because they know how to trick uneducated people? or actually just lack of emotions that makes them so appealing. are autistic folks taking over the world on both sides of the isle???
Oh I learned something alright, I learned that you need to lay off the fuckin tren.

No, they aren’t republics. They call themselves republics. There is a large difference. North Korea calls itself a republic. Russia. China. Iraq did once upon a time under Saddam. Vietnam. Laos. If you think those are republics because the word republic is in the name, you are mistook. They use the word ‘republic’ because calling themselves totalitarians puts a bad taste in people’s mouths…go figure.

Furthermore, total democracies are universally a poor form a government. None of the countries you have mentioned as being democracies are democracies. They are some form of constitutional republic or democratic republic or parliamentary/constitutional monarch.

I’m not sure you understand the difference between republic and democracy. The United States is a constitutional republic by title, but is also a democratic republic in practice. You could call us a democratic republic or flip it and say republican democracy, either way would be legitimate. One doesn’t necessarily negate the other. What you are claiming is that a democracy apart from a republic is superior. Which is utter nonsense.

Seriously lay off the trenbolone. You sound nuts with your ‘autism is taking over the world’ rant.

I will not further reply to your unhinged delusions here, so as to respect the wishes of the other members. If you wanna move it on over to the political thread, so be it.
 
Last edited:
Oh I learned something alright, I learned that you need to lay off the fuckin tren.

No, they aren’t republics. They call themselves republics. There is a large difference. North Korea calls itself a republic. Russia. China. Iraq did once upon a time under Saddam. Vietnam. Laos. If you think those are republics because the word republic is in the name, you are mistook. They use the word ‘republic’ because calling themselves totalitarians puts a bad taste in people’s mouths…go figure.

Furthermore, total democracies are universally a poor form a government. None of the countries you have mentioned as being democracies are democracies. They are some form of constitutional republic or democratic republic or parliamentary/constitutional monarch.

I’m not sure you understand the difference between republic and democracy. The United States is a constitutional republic by title, but is also a democratic republic in practice. You could call us a democratic republic or flip it and say republican democracy, either way would be legitimate. One doesn’t necessarily negate the other. What you are claiming is that a democracy apart from a republic is superior. Which is utter nonsense.

Seriously lay off the trenbolone. You sound nuts with your ‘autism is taking over the world’ rant.

I will not further reply to your unhinged delusions here, so as to respect the wishes of the other members. If you wanna move it on over to the political thread, so be it.
lol you have NO idea what ur talking about thats for certain...saying democracy is bad, but then saying USA is good cause partially democracy? BAHAHAH

very simply every true democracy has happier healthier people than any republics u can name ;)

the concept people get a vote should be an important value.. otherwise u get oligarchs like in USSR and now USA..

do u think parliamentary democracy is not democratic? ie Denmark.

do u think Poland moving away from partial democracy towards backwards republic a good thing? how's it working for them?

do you think your constitution was a bad thing? ie checks and balances to prevent 1 person having too much power and set up to be VASTLY more democratic than USA currently is? or should 1 person have all/most the power? ie leaving European oligarch monarch ways?

the point was simply, social democracies have happier healthier people than republics wether partially democratic or not. so I would say they are more successful and far from "Marx" or communist (which again communist countries are republics and lean towards that more as people get less of a say esp in all the failures). having super pac + republic ways = corruption and gov will never help its people but helps the oligarchy and the companies.

anyway, lay off the Charlie Kirk my dude
 
Last edited:
Back
Top