Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha got ya. I'm asking how can he really post tests without it being done by someone else? I'm saying if he tests and provides all the info. How do we know it's a test of his products and he produced it?
We all know he's gonna say Karl just used pharmacy gh. That's the issue
Hmm let's see here now, perhaps I've overlooked something?
Has KARL presented any evidence which even remotely suggests HE is PRODUCING PHARM GRADE GH, NOT!
(I've asked you to answer that SIMPLE question twice now UFC, but I expected a non-response from a Karl plant)
So yea, in both instances, if the shoe fits wear it!
Well if asking for evidence that supports anyone's claims within the scientific arena is "circular reasoning", I'm absolutely guilty as are many others on Meso including, Millard, Dr Scally, Bill Roberts and MANY other Meso members.
I'm not to surprised considering the source however, LMAO!
Hmm let's see here now, perhaps I've overlooked something?
Has KARL presented any evidence which even remotely suggests HE is PRODUCING PHARM GRADE GH, NOT!
(I've asked you to answer that SIMPLE question twice now UFC, but I expected a non-response from a Karl plant)
So yea, in both instances, if the shoe fits wear it!
Can your read?
Where am I denying that distinct possibility in this post?
What the heck are you talking about, or do you simply NOT understand the colloquialism "if the shoe fits wear it"!
Your ignorance of this thread, it's controversies, the issues, the evidence or conclusions made by myself or others is absolutely profound, COL!
If K is producing pharma quality gh, shouldn't or wouldn't there be lots of testing results available at any time? I'm no expert in this area, but it seems to me there should be a hell of a lot of testing going on where his gh is manufactured. The only results we have seen from K is from something that is not gh, so why exactly has it been so difficult to even produce a proper test that at least should come from gh? I am not referring to Mands testing or the serum tests. Just strictly K's testing or lack there of. Is this the reason in a nutshell why there are doubts as to whether K is actually producing gh or just repackaging pharm grade gh? Am I missing the mark here or am I correct in this line of thinking?
Banana
Hmm let's see here now, perhaps I've overlooked something?
Has KARL presented any evidence which even remotely suggests HE is PRODUCING PHARM GRADE GH, NOT!
(I've asked you to answer that SIMPLE question twice now UFC, but I expected a non-response from a Karl plant)
So yea, in both instances, if the shoe fits wear it!
@Dr JIM just post the test you want Karl to do! He and others have asked you to do so. They are trusting you as I do to tell him. You of all people know how much I respect you. Hell I basically begged you to come back to MESO. And anyone here that PM's me about you I tell them you are gtg. So if you are going to lead this crusade, what tests need to be done?
If you have already posted what tests to do I'm sure it has been buried already.
mands
Comment - I've consulted with my professor - there is no MRI test regarding GH which appear on USP ..... no clue where the hell he brought it from, but I'll be happy to hear as we don't know everything and here to cooperate.
If anything has to do with this then the test defined in USP is for testing on mice with their piturity is removed, while they being supplied with a certain protocol of GH application for 30 days, and their body composition is checked. This test is certainly NOT done on a regular basis on pharma compnies as a QA measure, but possibly one time before getting a license, not even this I'm sure at, but I'm willing to do this test for u (let me just consult with my professor), though it's a very complicated, long and expensive test, I'll take pics and give the mice names for the protocols (guess which names....)