Okay this is a strange question but when trying to donate to anaboliclab you need a pc don't you cause it won't let me on my android. Was curious if anyone else is having trouble like this....
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
What are the most popular manufacturers that should be tested as part of lab testing program?
- Thread starter Millard
- Start date
Have you guys noticed some of the results going up on the mast?
turcao
Well-known Member
2 are up already, both under dosed but legit mast
Hey, at least it shows there are mast. prop. raws out there.
Makes me wonder if these guys are buying from the same raw supplier and are both receiving underdosed raws in the first place?
Makes me wonder if these guys are buying from the same raw supplier and are both receiving underdosed raws in the first place?
turcao
Well-known Member
With the mostly positive results so far, it makes me think that all the people claiming bunk gear are either dosing it wrong, have unrealistic expectations or just don't put in the work. Of course bloodwork would confirm if the gear was bunk (test) but I'm guessing mist people that are too lazy too out in the work aren't going to get bloodwork.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Unrealistic expectations IMO. However, there is a lot of bunk gear out there as well.
What does mast show as on bloods?
Low lh and fsh
I would love to see some of the napsgear pharma get tested, i have some of their organon and farmak, and lets just say im highly suspicious after switching to it from a different lab's gear and losing a lot of my water retention and backne.
iintensity
New Member
It wasn't long until they uploaded the results to their website. They should be giving Anabolic Lab a kick back for doing their work.
Whoremoans
Member
The gear itself is more important to be tested. Way more important.
That's like an astronaut only giving a shit about getting up to space, but not about coming back to earth.
Izk
Well-known Member
Although i doubt meso members are interested in aussie brands, Australia has two brands in particular that need testing.
Lambourghini Labs and Anabolic Innovations.
I imagine if these were tested then anaboliclabs would get more traffic (and donations) from Australian forum members. While also creating awareness among the aussie forums.
Aussie forums are in need of an independantly testing lab that doesn't cost $2K each test, so there is quite a hole in the market.
Lambourghini Labs and Anabolic Innovations.
I imagine if these were tested then anaboliclabs would get more traffic (and donations) from Australian forum members. While also creating awareness among the aussie forums.
Aussie forums are in need of an independantly testing lab that doesn't cost $2K each test, so there is quite a hole in the market.
Whoremoans
Member
There's only so much money being donated into this program. This testing is complicated and expensive. If I were going to choose between expensive ass gear being tested and cheap ass research chemicals for the same cost of testing I'm going to choose the gear and just buy pharm grade ancillaries.
I believe the complete randomness of these tests is questionable. I've ran stuff from a lab that had supposedly great primo. They couldn't even dose their test correctly dosed (I had blood work done) and yet the more expensive primo is .9 mg overdosed? Come on now...
The manufacturer/reseller has no idea who is buying the product, which product is purchased or when it is purchased. The acquisition is done secretly and anonymously. There is no way this could be anything other than a random sample.
A Primobolan report from AnabolicLab doesn't say anything about the testosterone products from the same UGL much less about the specific testosterone product you used. It definitely doesn't prove the UGL's testosterone products are accurately dosed. I'm not sure why you seem to think it does.
And for that matter, it doesn't necessarily prove that ALL of the UGL's Primobolan products are accurately dosed. It just provides evidence involving a randomly-selected sample of the Primobolan.
Fair enough. Thanks for the insight.
@Millard Baker
With compound blends, or mixes if you will, becoming more popular, would it be prudent to test some of these blended compounds at some point?
For a lab to claim a compound blend of lets say 3 different Tren esters or 3 different different compounds at a particular ratio, it would be both interesting and important to see how close they come or if in fact the 3 Tren esters are in actuality just Tren E.
With compound blends, or mixes if you will, becoming more popular, would it be prudent to test some of these blended compounds at some point?
For a lab to claim a compound blend of lets say 3 different Tren esters or 3 different different compounds at a particular ratio, it would be both interesting and important to see how close they come or if in fact the 3 Tren esters are in actuality just Tren E.
Sust is what I'd like to see tested!!!!
Similar threads
