What are the most popular manufacturers that should be tested as part of lab testing program?

Agree with @Steve84 on Wellness Fitness Nutrition. They make a ton of claims that aren't true, like being a registered FDA compounding facility. I have seen them talked up on multiple forums, and even by some popular youtube personalities. If the rumors are true, they have a huge customer base all willing to pay extremely high prices for WFN products. Testing those products would be good for harm reduction as well as good publicity for AL.
 
I'd like to see some results for zhengzhou pharmaceuticals. Don't here much about them but from the little i have seen it's been good. Guys selling pharmacom are also selling zhengzhou I've seen.
 
I'd like to see some results for zhengzhou pharmaceuticals. Don't here much about them but from the little i have seen it's been good. Guys selling pharmacom are also selling zhengzhou I've seen.

You hear a lot about them. You just don't realize it's them.
 
Would be awesome to start seeing some generic gh brands tested. Any interest there?

You're going to have to break your piggy bank open for that, I forget actual figures but it is highly expensive from what I recall.

It is likely well beyond the current scope of the program.

Until we reach a new era of Millard's program, pharma it is. :)
 
@Millard Baker can we see some sustanon for our trt pts out there? Preferably pharmacoms?
It costs to test each ester, basically having to pay for four separate tests just to have one vial tested. I see why it hasn't been tested, but I'd like to see some of the guys selling it tested for sure. If they can hit label claims on sust they're doing pretty well, especially the one who break down exactly how many mgs of each ester there is supposed to be in each mL
 
Since the samples are sent anonymously, is it also possible that the labs themselves can send good products? In return send their customers not so good ones?
 
I think samples are bought by owner of AL and sent in, by samples being sent in annon they mean the source doesn't know when the samples that are going to be sent in are purchased. Don't quote me on that though I could be wrong
 
Since the samples are sent anonymously, is it also possible that the labs themselves can send good products? In return send their customers not so good ones?

Of course. Labs can send simec whatever they want, and then send customers whatever they want. I personally take simec reports that a ugl posts with a grain of salt. They aren't going to post up a report with bad results... they'll post up all the good reports and act like the bad never happened.

AnabolicLab on the other hand, I trust the results they provide. The sample is bought anonymously and will be posted regardless of the test results being good or bad.
 
Back
Top