What are the most popular manufacturers that should be tested as part of lab testing program?

Dictator is domestic Nationwide and fairly popular too. Private at times i believe. Interesting to see if restricting who gets the stuff would have bearing on what's in the bottle.
 
While the big name international labs should probably be the highest priority given the size of their user base, it probably also makes sense to test well known USA domestic labs like DomX, Kodiak, etc.
 
I think he is avoiding US domestic sources, because testing them would attract unwanted US legal attention. I believe the current testing program doesn't violate any laws.
 
While the big name international labs should probably be the highest priority given the size of their user base, it probably also makes sense to test well known USA domestic labs like DomX, Kodiak, etc.

I think he is avoiding US domestic sources, because testing them would attract unwanted US legal attention. I believe the current testing program doesn't violate any laws.
Yes, but please continue to list top US domestic. It may not be the current focus of testing efforts but that could instantly change. I don't want anyone to think they don't have to worry about random, unannounced testing.
 
I asked over on steroid.com if it would be OK to link to the testing site (they have different, sometimes arbitrary rules there). He (BG) took one look at the site and said he didn't know if he could trust it. He didn't say, but I'm sure he meant, those numbers don't fit what he knows about those labs..
 
I asked over on steroid.com if it would be OK to link to the testing site (they have different, sometimes arbitrary rules there). He (BG) took one look at the site and said he didn't know if he could trust it. He didn't say, but I'm sure he meant, those numbers don't fit what he knows about those labs..
I considered several scenarios where negative lab results would cause some controversy. I never considered what would happen if some of the results were "too good".

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some people will be quick to dismiss unbiased and objective evidence that is inconsistent with what "they know" whether it is negative OR positive.
 
I considered several scenarios where negative lab results would cause some controversy. I never considered what would happen if some of the results were "too good".

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some people will be quick to dismiss unbiased and objective evidence that is inconsistent with what "they know" whether it is negative OR positive.
I guess he looked into it and decided it was OK. He told me to go ahead and post a link..
 
Yes, but please continue to list top US domestic. It may not be the current focus of testing efforts but that could instantly change. I don't want anyone to think they don't have to worry about random, unannounced testing.
As I've said, this is going to get interesting. Sources (including private) that don't get tested are going to be mad because they'll lose business to sources that are. And when people start getting money taken out of their pockets, they get pissed
 
As I've said, this is going to get interesting. Sources (including private) that don't get tested are going to be mad because they'll lose business to sources that are. And when people start getting money taken out of their pockets, they get pissed
You are assuming that all of these sources would want to be tested and that they would benefit from the results. I think the overwhelming number of sources will be thrilled to NOT be tested and will do everything to AVOID being tested. The selection for testing is NOT an unequivocably good thing for their business. They will be most pissed when they are tested and the results are poor.
 
I only really have knowledge of UK labs but aside from the labs that spring up then dissapear I know the below labs are long standing and popular, ordered oldest to newest as far as I know.

Wildcat.
ROHM.
D-Hacks.
Apollo.
Sphinx.
 
You are assuming that all of these sources would want to be tested and that they would benefit from the results. I think the overwhelming number of sources will be thrilled to NOT be tested and will do everything to AVOID being tested. The selection for testing is NOT an unequivocably good thing for their business. They will be most pissed when they are tested and the results are poor.
I totally agree,either way it's going to cost them business. The dirty tricks and the pushback to discredit will be the interesting part
 
If the testing is being done for the safety of the consumers then I believe its reasonable for the testing to focus on the labs that have the highest share of the consumer base. The needs of the many scenario. Half of the labs tested are the "lions share" labs the other half are the "up and comers".

Fyi: The pharmacom oral dbol seems to be in question heavily at the moment. i didn't buy any so I have no personal stake in this. Its being talked about a lot on the pharmacom threads. Just a mention.
 
The collection period was between April 10, 2015 and May 10, 2015. The lab received the samples were received by the lab between May 5, 2015 and May 19, 2015. The tests were completed on May 28, 2015. We'll start posting the results in a couple of days on the new website. :)

New website?
 
Are you going to be testing AI"s ? How about you test Meso"s own Cem-Meso ? The Liquidex and Tamox to start ....

PS - Millard , do you stand behind Cem-Meso products, or are they just advertisers here ?
 
Back
Top