Dictator is domestic Nationwide and fairly popular too. Private at times i believe. Interesting to see if restricting who gets the stuff would have bearing on what's in the bottle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While the big name international labs should probably be the highest priority given the size of their user base, it probably also makes sense to test well known USA domestic labs like DomX, Kodiak, etc.
Yes, but please continue to list top US domestic. It may not be the current focus of testing efforts but that could instantly change. I don't want anyone to think they don't have to worry about random, unannounced testing.I think he is avoiding US domestic sources, because testing them would attract unwanted US legal attention. I believe the current testing program doesn't violate any laws.
I considered several scenarios where negative lab results would cause some controversy. I never considered what would happen if some of the results were "too good".I asked over on steroid.com if it would be OK to link to the testing site (they have different, sometimes arbitrary rules there). He (BG) took one look at the site and said he didn't know if he could trust it. He didn't say, but I'm sure he meant, those numbers don't fit what he knows about those labs..
I guess he looked into it and decided it was OK. He told me to go ahead and post a link..I considered several scenarios where negative lab results would cause some controversy. I never considered what would happen if some of the results were "too good".
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some people will be quick to dismiss unbiased and objective evidence that is inconsistent with what "they know" whether it is negative OR positive.
As I've said, this is going to get interesting. Sources (including private) that don't get tested are going to be mad because they'll lose business to sources that are. And when people start getting money taken out of their pockets, they get pissedYes, but please continue to list top US domestic. It may not be the current focus of testing efforts but that could instantly change. I don't want anyone to think they don't have to worry about random, unannounced testing.
You are assuming that all of these sources would want to be tested and that they would benefit from the results. I think the overwhelming number of sources will be thrilled to NOT be tested and will do everything to AVOID being tested. The selection for testing is NOT an unequivocably good thing for their business. They will be most pissed when they are tested and the results are poor.As I've said, this is going to get interesting. Sources (including private) that don't get tested are going to be mad because they'll lose business to sources that are. And when people start getting money taken out of their pockets, they get pissed
That's good news!I guess he looked into it and decided it was OK. He told me to go ahead and post a link..
I totally agree,either way it's going to cost them business. The dirty tricks and the pushback to discredit will be the interesting partYou are assuming that all of these sources would want to be tested and that they would benefit from the results. I think the overwhelming number of sources will be thrilled to NOT be tested and will do everything to AVOID being tested. The selection for testing is NOT an unequivocably good thing for their business. They will be most pissed when they are tested and the results are poor.
The collection period was between April 10, 2015 and May 10, 2015. The lab received the samples were received by the lab between May 5, 2015 and May 19, 2015. The tests were completed on May 28, 2015. We'll start posting the results in a couple of days on the new website.