What’s the current state of generic GH

[Ghoul]

I believe most of you are missing the point.

There is no need to speculate on what may or may not happen based on some published papers using growth hormone.

Unless you're using that exact version of growth hormone, it doesn't apply. For example, some of the data mentions excipients having an effect on aggregates and filter fouling.

Harm reduction is taking those ideas and validating them through testing. Without testing you can speculate all day on what happens to UGL GH or various Peptides.

Some of the data here may be valid, but without testing it's not usable because it's not a direct comparison to anything used by this community.

At no point have I suggested it's harmful whatever else people feel like they want me to be saying. The point is you have no data supporting what happens to UGL GH or Peptides via filtering...or any other data to be honest.

Don't call unsupported speculation harm reduction because it isn't.

Nope no idea at all what happens to peptides when filtering....

 

[readalot]

Nope no idea at all what happens to peptides when filtering....

View attachment 321266

 

[readalot]

Definitely don't look at Table 1 of the 2018 paper I shared with you. Looks nothing like the excipient list by a popular vendor here. Not sure what I was thinking.

View attachment 319966

And Table 2. What a joke. Don't even get me started on the rest of the paper.

My bad. Really.

Maybe they used Lobster's stuff come to think of it. Small world.

@Ghoul

Honestly man, do you think many looked at Table 1 much less Table 2 or 3?

Solid try though. It's okay. I've made peace with it.

 

[Ghoul]

@Ghoul

Honestly man, do you think many looked at Table 1 much less Table 2 or 3?

Solid try though. It's okay. I've made peace with it.

I avoid answering the expected objections in advance. Let them wear themselves out one by one, it's more educational that way,

 

[readalot]

I avoid answering the expected objections in advance. Let the wear themselves out one by one, it's more educational that way,

I enjoyed the interactions on here with you. Thanks for all your efforts!! Sincerely.

 

[Toaster]

Nope no idea at all what happens to peptides when filtering....

View attachment 321266

Provide your own data or don't, doesn't matter to me.

 

[Ghoul]

Provide your own data or don't, doesn't matter to me.

I don't understand what you're asking for,

Are you suggesting this data is invalid, false, completely irrelevant to UGL?

It's a peer reviewed studied authored by one of the world's foremost experts on peptide drugs.

You put a reconstituted peptide solution in one end, regardless of its level of contaminants, and you get a significantly less contaminated one out of the other side.

Is that in doubt?

 

[AlwaysHungry]

I don't understand what you're asking for,

Are you suggesting this data is invalid, false, completely irrelevant to UGL?

It's a peer reviewed studied authored by one of the world's foremost experts on peptide drugs.

You put a reconstituted peptide solution in one end, regardless of its level of contaminants, and you get a significantly less contaminated one out of the other side.

Is that in doubt?

I think he meant no one understands shit from this table lol at least I don’t

 

[Ghoul]

I think he meant no one understands shit from this table lol at least I don’t

It's a count of contaminating particles in a vial of growth hormone, which you don't want to inject, before and after being pushed through a syringe filter. From 90,000 down to 300.