Bob1990
New Member
I’ll share my bloodwork next week.
I’ve been on rosuva for 1.5 month now.
My lipids were horrible.
Will see what happens
I’ve been on rosuva for 1.5 month now.
My lipids were horrible.
Will see what happens
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rosuva is satisfactory. Side effect profile isn’t as good as pita but it’s not terrible. It will have robust effect at 5-10 mgThanks for sharing.
Now that you mention it, I don't know if they can prescribe pita in my country. But I know they prescribe rosu, which seems superior to simvastatin. I think I'll wait, complain and try to get pita or rosuvastatin prescribed.
It's not just making bad HDL but one of the terminal metabolites from niacin is known to be inflammatory on its own, so it's a double whammy.Niacin produces poor quality HDL so despite the number rising it’s either going to be useless or even harmful, since “bad” HDL is inflammatory. That’s why all the cardiology guidelines dropped it.
Pita raises HDL quantity AND increases quality. (For anyone curious, APO-I is the marker that indicates HDL quality).
Not sure what supps you’re using to lower cholesterol but I’m going to guess you could buy Pita with the money spent on them and get a better outcome.
Is one of them Red Yeast Rice?
For one they are tough on your liver and two certain statins will freely attack your muscle as readily as they will your liver.I am (again).
I do not see any risk in low/moderate dose statin therapy.
I also think statins should be a staple supplement during cycle/orals.
For one they are tough on your liver and two certain statins will freely attack your muscle as readily as they will your liver.
No magic pills in this world, everything has its cost.
Saying "there's no such thing as magic pills" and "everything has a cost" is just spouting some platitudes to back up whatever position you've decided you want to take.For one they are tough on your liver and two certain statins will freely attack your muscle as readily as they will your liver.
No magic pills in this world, everything has its cost.
For one they are tough on your liver and two certain statins will freely attack your muscle as readily as they will your liver.
No magic pills in this world, everything has its cost.

Some red yeast rice supplements also could have citrinin in them, which is a toxin that can harm the kidneys. As you point out, since the active ingredient in RYR is a statin, it doesn't make sense to combine it with a statin anyway.It looks like RYR in the UK is allowed to contain monacolin k, so this makes more sense than people using it in the US where it is illegal for it to contain it, but monacolin k is chemically identical to lovastatin, the first generation statin that is basically never prescribed anymore because it has one of the worst efficacy to side effect profiles of any statin.
If other statins have given you problems I would be surprised if lovastatin was better - for most people it's among the worst, and you're also effectively doubling up on statin usage.
Statins reduce:
• tendon fibroblast proliferation
• Type I collagen synthesis
• mitochondrial function in connective tissue
• glycosaminoglycan production (joint lubrication and cartilage resilience)
• nitric oxide signaling (soft tissue blood flow)
Which leads to:
• stiff, dry, less elastic tendons
• slower turnover of micro-damage
• much higher injury risk when training hard
• delayed healing from surgery
Statins reduce:
Typical figures from controlled studies:
- Akt signaling
- Protein synthesis rate per workout
- Satellite cell activation after mechanical load
- Collagen turnover and tendon remodeling
- Myotube growth
- 20–35 percent reduction in muscle protein synthesis after training
- 35–50 percent reduction in satellite cell response in animal models
In HIV patients (a group significantly at risk for muscle loss), pitavastatin showed no muscle or strength loss vs. placebo. If you're worried about this, pitavastatin does not enter muscle tissue at a high rate, especially compared to other lyphophilic statins due to some aspects of it's chemistry.
No Evidence of Pitavastatin Effect on Muscle Area or Density among People with HIV - PMC
Skeletal muscle area (MA) and muscle density (MD) are key determinants of physical function and typically decline with increasing age. Statins have well-known musculoskeletal effects but whether statins impact MA or MD is not well established, ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
![]()
Pitavastatin Is Well-Tolerated With no Detrimental Effects on Physical Function - PubMed
We observed minimal declines in physical function over 5 years of follow-up among middle-aged PWH, with no differences among PWH randomized to pitavastatin compared to placebo. This finding, combined with low prevalence of myalgias, supports the long-term safety of statin therapy on physical...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Even "worse" statins don't seem to cause an issue, though, such as atorvastatin
I can't find a study explicitly looking at people on a hypertrophy program and see any direct comparisons but I think we can extrapolate a good bit from these.
