Would you inject this (pics)

I emailed simec today to get an update. Today was 3 weeks that they've had it and that's when they said they'd be done

For what it's worth, SIMEC received my sample on April 7th and I just received the results today. My test also seems more simple than yours as if I'm reading it correct it only shows dose.
 
For what it's worth, SIMEC received my sample on April 7th and I just received the results today. My test also seems more simple than yours as if I'm reading it correct it only shows dose.

That's way longer then their 3 week estimate. Mine was April 26
 
You're not speaking of opinions. You're making actual false statements. Rather than wait for the test results to come back as everyone else, you continue to persist with your tales.

You specifically stated there have been too many instances of contaminated gear. You can't even provide one lone example of this. Do you always make statements on a whim that you cannot back up?



I don't need a lab to tell me the difference between bacteria and crashed gear. the gear had bacteria growing in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MFG
I don't need a lab to tell me the difference between bacteria and crashed gear. the gear had bacteria growing in it.

Those are the words of someone whose already made up their mind and won't change for any reason (like the juror who has it in his head before any evidence is put forth that no matter what, the defendant is guilty). But anyway, Yes, actually you do and so does everyone else need the lab results.
 
Those are the words of someone whose already made up their mind and won't change for any reason (like the juror who has it in his head before any evidence is put forth that no matter what, the defendant is guilty). But anyway, Yes, actually you do and so does everyone else need the lab results.


you are the juror that says the perp is innocent even though the perp was caught with a bloody knife in his hand and a dead body at his feet. normally you have good advice, but in this case you have been wrong the whole time. I know what crashed gear looks like and I know what contaminated gear looks like. crashed gear never will look like fuzzy little balls. the way your acting toward this source makes me think you have some kind of connection and are being bias, not being non bias like me. good luck with your contaminated gear.
 
you are the juror that says the perp is innocent even though the perp was caught with a bloody knife in his hand and a dead body at his feet. normally you have good advice, but in this case you have been wrong the whole time. I know what crashed gear looks like and I know what contaminated gear looks like. crashed gear never will look like fuzzy little balls. the way your acting toward this source makes me think you have some kind of connection and are being bias, not being non bias like me. good luck with your contaminated gear.

I'm the biased one bc I'm waiting for ALL the facts to come in before deciding guilt and you're the non-biased one bc you've already decided guilt EVEN if the independent lab report says otherwise? Sorry to inform you but your analogy needs work.

I needed a good laugh to start my day. Thank you very much.
 
I'm the biased one bc I'm waiting for ALL the facts to come in before deciding guilt and you're the non-biased one bc you've already decided guilt EVEN if the independent lab report says otherwise? Sorry to inform you but your analogy needs work.

I needed a good laugh to start my day. Thank you very much.



well the most stupid comment you made was saying you would still inject it. that is not waiting on the lab to tell you if it is still good to go. gear doesn't crash two different ways. the laws of chemistry doesn't allow it. the only time I've seen fussy balls was from something growing in the gear, so why do any of us need a lab to tell us something is wrong with the gear? should be common sense.
 
well the most stupid comment you made was saying you would still inject it. that is not waiting on the lab to tell you if it is still good to go. gear doesn't crash two different ways. the laws of chemistry doesn't allow it. the only time I've seen fussy balls was from something growing in the gear, so why do any of us need a lab to tell us something is wrong with the gear? should be common sense.

Yes I would bc I'm confident enough that it is not contamination but that has no bearing on me changing my mind if the test comes back saying otherwise. Unlike you though, I'm open to changing my mind wherein lies your problem.

Please don't try to lecture me on common sense or the laws of chemistry. This thread has shown you don't know about either.
 
The thing is that the balls seem to always be acompanied by crystals, has anyone seen perfectly clear vials with a few fuzzies in it? I have marked all the vials I had to microwave with an "X" until the labs come back.
 
Back
Top