Whistles77
Member
if its sugar pills vs real product. On $50 of product it's either a $200 cost for certainty that its real, or money back if its bunk. If sugar pills, then there's not much harm.Testing is not the weird gamble in the above-described scenario.
Unless i get other data points from people saying it should taste like shit, then i'm really not able to make an informed choice.
Sadly with this shitty test reimbursement policy it puts the costs and risk of testing on the customer which only makes a lot of sense at certain economies of scale (or with strong evidence rather than my suspicion based on taste).
Would rather throw it out than throw out $200 more.
