Update on my situation.
For anyone unaware: I got my bloods done during week 8 of my cycle which was about 10 days ago. I was running 500mg/wk test cyp during weeks 1-6, and upped it to 600/wk from week 6 onward because I suspected underdosing. I was also running aro and hcg.
Total test level came back at 3035 ng/dl. Bloods were drawn around 55 hours after the last injection.
Here's a link to my cycle log which has the complete bloods and more info on my cycle in general
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/first-cycle-usaspetz-anabolix.134358874/page-2
Immediately after posting my bloods in my log, I posted here asking spetz what the deal was, and how he was going to go about fixing this issue. He responded that day asking me to email him. From there
we decided that I would be refunded the $155 I spent on the 3 vials of test cyp that were under-dosed and shipping. Also, he credited me $150 for having my bloods done, which I put towards his test e amps. His response times via email weren't as quick as they were when I ordered back in Sept, and apparently the email containing the WU pickup info got lost in the shuffle because I didn't receive it the first time he supposedly sent it. He got the info to me quickly after I followed up asking for it though.
The turnaround time on the package was very quick. From the time I received the tracking #, two days passed and the pack was here. Stealth was very good. When I opened it up, I found 20 ampules and a vial of his own test e. One point here:
the manufacture date of the amps is 12/2010 with an expiry of 12/2015. I'm going to be using these immediately, so I'm not worried. But if you're stocking up for a cycle next winter, keep this in mind. I feel like Spetz should mention this on his pricelist if all of his "limited stock" of amps are the same.
One more minor hiccup: when I went to WU to pick up the funds, the clerk let me know that the test answer I was provided was spelled differently than the answer spetz emailed to me with the pickup info. She gave me the money anyway after I told her what the test question was verbatim, but if I had gotten a male clerk or a hardass this could have been a problem. Fortunately, it was not. But I think it corroborates with the theme that spetz seems to be inconsistent in multiple areas of communication and quality. I hope that he irons it all out, because all in all- I am very impressed with how he handled this situation for me. I hope that any outstanding issues are handled in the exact same fashion, so that everyone is made whole and spetz can prove he's able to handle our business.