GODT240 super promo--Pharma grade HGH 240iu only 264$

[TRT]

Oh really so is your opinion thank you

No. Those were test results done by mands...your welcome.

 

[godt240]

Yeah I have no issue with it I mean he disclosed it. I know many boards it is accepted . I was just letting him know that his review could be viewed as biased and he shouldn't be giving a review . I don't think you did anything wrong I was just pointing out that about the review. and he needs to keep his word and buy another kit.

that kit was sent to him for blood test at very beginning

 

[Ripped]

that kit was sent to him for blood test at very beginning

Yeah if he's not holding up his end of the deal he will be put on blast. @The Rock you need to keep you're word bro.

 

[godt240]

Agreed. And I'll say it again. They came out at 16ius in the vial not 24ius. So that's 1.27 an iu at 204$.

oh yeah, u only one vial tested 16iu last year, and u dont think about some vials tested 20s . and also 36$ shipping cost ,u still counted in the price of gh. if u dont have good memory , let me remind u: u get one kit 168$, and 36$ is shipping cost.

and remember, promo finished now, no one can get this price any more. even next vial will be tested 10iu.

 

[TRT]

oh yeah, u only one vial tested 16iu last year, and u dont think about some vials tested 20s . and also 36$ shipping cost ,u still counted in the price of gh. if u dont have good memory , let me remind u: u get one kit 168$, and 36$ is shipping cost.

and remember, promo finished now, no one can get this price any more. even next vial will be tested 10iu.

Who said it wasn't gonna get tested again? Hope you sent that kit out before I said that. Lol

I thought today was the last day? [emoji20]

 

[Dr JIM]

If you read back through the thread GT offered a window for people to buy a kit, post IGF-1 and serum results, and either receive a refund or a free kit. Just trying to give you context, not trying to sway you either way.

So far the bloods have looked good, but as Jim mentioned this is a work in progress.

Bc of the high degree of variability bt individuals, serum IGF/GH is no substitute for the GH quantative gold standard, an Amino Acid Analysis of the VIAL CONTENTS.

To that end utilizing serum IGF changes as a quantative marker of G-GH quality is a fallacy propagated on PED forums almost exclusively, with resalers leading the band.

Jim

 

[Brolloks]

No. Those were test results done by mands...your welcome.

16.29iu was the lowest of the GT samples tested, so it's a bit mischievous to keep using that as a reference. Not even mentioning the fact that the same lab tested legit seros as underdosed, and the ensuing controversy led to the testing being abandoned.

If it was as easy to find a testing lab as Jim suggests, why could be not get it right?

 

[Obeast88]

Idk why everyone is always bringing up the 16 the god t got. No one is complaining that the greys everyone loves also came back at like 7. Something if I'm not mistaken so if you do the math it would still put them both somewhere around 30 percent under dosed. But you aren't hearing any shit on that are we just because of who supplies it in my opinion.

 

[Marcus]

They came back at 16.29, 17.4 and 20.28.

mands

16.29iu was the lowest of the GT samples tested, so it's a bit mischievous to keep using that as a reference. Not even mentioning the fact that the same lab tested legit seros as underdosed, and the ensuing controversy led to the testing being abandoned.

If it was as easy to find a testing lab as Jim suggests, why could be not get it right?

Idk why everyone is always bringing up the 16 the god t got. No one is complaining that the greys everyone loves also came back at like 7. Something if I'm not mistaken so if you do the math it would still put them both somewhere around 30 percent under dosed. But you aren't hearing any shit on that are we just because of who supplies it in my opinion.

While I agree with you somewhat brollocks, it's more the WHO you're dealing with. Other GH is being sold by longer standing reputable sellers, which means that if/when there is a problem, it is more likely that they will deal with it instead of packing up and jumping ship.

This may seem a good buy now, and I hope for everyone here that it is permanently... more, good GH suppliers is better than less obviously. However, the concern comes that if batches come back poorly dosed, then it is more likely Matt will pack up and jump ship as he doesn't have a reputation to uphold as if yet.

Only time will establish him and his product, and I am truly routing for him. If the product and service is consistent then I know eventually I will purchase from him, and I'm sure many others will.

Again, I really do want this to succeed, but everyone should proceed with caution just as we do with all sources just beginning to be established. Especially with something as large as investment as GH.

 

[Brolloks]

@Marcus I agree - scrutiny and suspicion is important, and Matt still has a lot of convincing to do here.

What is hard to deny is that he's giving his product the opportunity to do the talking. He has a large and loyal following over at eroids, who would pull him up quickly if there was a drop in quality. I know that doesn't count for much here though.

 

[Marcus]

@Marcus I agree - scrutiny and suspicion is important, and Matt still has a lot of convincing to do here.

What is hard to deny is that he's giving his product the opportunity to do the talking. He has a large and loyal following over at eroids, who would pull him up quickly if there was a drop in quality. I know that doesn't count for much here though.

I do completely give Matt props for his willingness for his product to be scrutinized, hats off to him for that. And ya, fuck eroids lol.

 

[TRT]

16.29iu was the lowest of the GT samples tested, so it's a bit mischievous to keep using that as a reference. Not even mentioning the fact that the same lab tested legit seros as underdosed, and the ensuing controversy led to the testing being abandoned.

If it was as easy to find a testing lab as Jim suggests, why could be not get it right?

It's not so much the results as the red welting he claimed to be normal that I'm concerned about. He also said the 16 iu was last year...okay so has something changed? What? And why didn't he say something? He just acts shady as hell. Avoids the same question by a member here 7x. Something still isn't right here. I don't care what anyone says.

I didnt know the testing was completely banned. I wasn't following to closely since I wasn't looking to buy GH at the time.

 

[Ripped]

It's not so much the results as the red welting he claimed to be normal that I'm concerned about. He also said the 16 iu was last year...okay so has something changed? What? And why didn't he say something? He just acts shady as hell. Avoids the same question by a member here 7x. Something still isn't right here. I don't care what anyone says.

I didnt know the testing was completely banned. I wasn't following to closely since I wasn't looking to buy GH at the time.

I have gotten welts from other GH not taking up for anyone just saying it happened with me but it was also random it wasn't every time .

 

[TRT]

Well I just ordered so I'm gonna see if I get em. When it comes to subq I'm sensitive for some reason so I'm anxious to see what happens.
Maybe red welts are occuring with UGL but not pharma grade. I'm sticking to the fact that it's not normal. Just NEVER seen anyone running generics get them.

 

[Brolloks]

It's not so much the results as the red welting he claimed to be normal that I'm concerned about. He also said the 16 iu was last year...okay so has something changed? What? And why didn't he say something? He just acts shady as hell. Avoids the same question by a member here 7x. Something still isn't right here. I don't care what anyone says.

He admitted that he found out the lab that supplies his GH underdosed the previous trial batch without his knowledge.

I didnt know the testing was completely banned. I wasn't following to closely since I wasn't looking to buy GH at the time.

Not banned. Abandoned. I'm guessing @mands didn't feel their effort was appreciated, which I can fully understand.

 

[godt240]

new blood test on IGF1 posted on another board
Pictures - Godtropin IGF-1 Pre and during cycle

 

[Naugahyde]

@Marcus I agree - scrutiny and suspicion is important, and Matt still has a lot of convincing to do here.

What is hard to deny is that he's giving his product the opportunity to do the talking. He has a large and loyal following over at eroids, who would pull him up quickly if there was a drop in quality. I know that doesn't count for much here though.

If you check his feed over on eroids right now in fact lots of his buyers complaining about red welt issues, I was contemplating an order but this is a cause of concern to me.

 

[puckhog]

It is interesting that virtually NONE of the other hgh resellers have customer complaints of red welt issues.

 

[Marcus]

new blood test on IGF1 posted on another board
Pictures - Godtropin IGF-1 Pre and during cycle

The guy posting claims crazy shit and a guy calls him out on it.

 

[Ripped]

It is interesting that virtually NONE of the other hgh resellers have customer complaints of red welt issues.

I have gotten welts from a popular brand but I haven't complained about it because besides once I believe it was error on my part.
But I will be running Godt240 I'm a few weeks and I will know more about his products .