GODT240 super promo--Pharma grade HGH 240iu only 264$

[Marcus]

462, still good number, how long do u run ?

3 weeks. Happy with number, just thought it would be higher

 

[godt240]

OK guy's don't start bashing me.I'm the last one on here to ask for anything free or screw someone over.I'm like 4 vials into my kit.I ordered labs and got them already and they didn't do the HGH serum or IGF-1 test right.I can do it now or wait until the kits is done.I will say that at 3 iu a night i'm feeling and looking great.I'l probably bump up to 4 .So guys i'm not some kids who has to save his pennies to get this .I have every intention of getting a years worth just for my personal use.So far I like this product and have no issues.Is there someone I can order these test from outside of my doctor.Maybe they'd be less apt to mess it up. Also guys sorry I haven't been on here for a while.My wife and I had agreed to take a break from the phone media ,I took a couple of weeks off .Remember I was the one originally who said to give this guy a try.I only hope that the quality of this product stays like it is and doesn't become inconsistent .I'll order the test today if I can get an online company that I can go to in my town.

sorry if i misunderstand u, man
before, i got scammed by many clients, even some repeated clients asked me to ship the package first ,then they would send me the funds once they get it. but most of them just disappeared .vi get used to it. that's why i don't ship out without payment.

actually u got the free kit long time ago, and u r supposed to run serum test,so i dont need to send u free kit for the blood test. but that's fine. if u think its good quality, u can take promo, otherwise, its fine. no obligation.
much respect

 

[godt240]

3 weeks. Happy with number, just thought it would be higher

3 weeks, 10iu per day, still good number. and its also individual .

 

[Roco Bama]

462, still good number, how long do u run ?

That's not a good number but some people could respond poorly to hgh depending on what other stuff they are running. Anyway it wasn't your hgh that he was running, it was the greytops

 

[janoshik]

Given the positive reception, I've uploaded result sheet and raw data of Godtropin sample and raw data and calibration curve of EU Pharma standard.

Meso doesn't let me upload more than 10 images at a time, so I'll send the rest of the data necessary to construct a calibration curve in next post.

 

[Marcus]

3 weeks, 10iu per day, still good number. and its also individual .

@Rockclimber dad got like what? 385 on 2iu per day? I was doing 5X that amount and only scored 100 higher. I don't think that sounds right, but like I said... more tests needed

 

[janoshik]

Rest of standard data.

 

[janoshik]

That's how proper testing of HGH looks like I'll be happy to answer any questions asked.

 

[mands]

Given the positive reception, I've uploaded result sheet and raw data of Godtropin sample and raw data and calibration curve of EU Pharma standard.

Meso doesn't let me upload more than 10 images at a time, so I'll send the rest of the data necessary to construct a calibration curve in next post.

Do not post any raw data for or from any source on this forum sent directly to you. They can post if they so choose.

If someone wants to buy anonymously and send a sample to @Analyzer they can do so. No need for you to post info. He already got reamed for this on another thread.

I would advise you take it down and let GT post it.

Thanks,

mands

 

[janoshik]

Do not post any raw data for or from any source on this forum sent directly to you. They can post if they so choose.

If someone wants to buy anonymously and send a sample to @Analyzer they can do so. No need for you to post info. He already got reamed for this on this thread.

Thanks,

mands

1. I asked if people here wanted to see the data and they said yes.

2. The sample was not sent directly to me from the source

3. You received samples for testing directly from Turkish pharmacy to be sent off for testing, did you not?

4. Of course anybody can buy any sample and send it off anywhere they want, no need for you allowing it.

5. Only person who "reamed" Godt was @Dr JIM who is a massive liar and fraud. Other people had their comments and suggested Analyzer, but I wouldn't call it reaming.

Not a single soul but JIM. Who is lying and showing his incompetence in most of his posts related to any sort of science. I know you see it and I'm disappointed YOU don't call him out on it, ever.

6. No need for me to post info, but I was literally asked for it:
GODT240 super promo--Pharma grade HGH 240iu only 264$

7. It's not forbidden in the rules.

So, what was point of your post? I don't understand what is wrong with it.

GodT doesn't have my raw data.

Thanks

 

[Rockclimber]

@Rockclimber dad got like what? 385 on 2iu per day? I was doing 5X that amount and only scored 100 higher. I don't think that sounds right, but like I said... more tests needed

323 IGF-1
7.5 GH
423 Testosterone
7.84 Free Test

 

[mands]

1. I asked if people here wanted to see the data and they said yes.

2. The sample was not sent directly to me from the source

3. You received samples for testing directly from Turkish pharmacy to be sent off for testing, did you not?

4. Of course anybody can buy any sample and send it off anywhere they want, no need for you allowing it.

5. Only person who "reamed" Godt was @Dr JIM who is a massive liar and fraud. Other people had their comments and suggested Analyzer, but I wouldn't call it reaming.

Not a single soul but JIM. Who is lying and showing his incompetence in most of his posts related to any sort of science. I know you see it and I'm disappointed YOU don't call him out on it, ever.

6. No need for me to post info, but I was literally asked for it:
GODT240 super promo--Pharma grade HGH 240iu only 264$

7. It's not forbidden in the rules.

So, what was point of your post?

Thanks

1. That's not determined by you as a tester to ask. It means nothing to most the members when a sample is sent to the tester from the supplier or non member. It can be manipulated from the supplier. It's obviously overdosed. What do you think this does besides drive sales to the source?

2. I apologize I thought earlier he stated that he was sending you one? Was it a member from meso? I highly doubt it.

3. I did and I posted the results not the tester nor did I post it in the underground section to facilitate sales.

4. I agree.

5. Actually I was referring to @Analyzer. He was reamed for doing the same thing you are. Posting for GT.

6. I saw where you asked and a member or two said they would love to see it.

7. It's an unspoken rule on this board as we don't have moderators to protect sources and testers.

8. My point was to tell you NOT to post on behalf of a source or a non member here at MESO.

We good now?

mands

 

[Marcus]

1. That's not determined by you as a tester to ask. It means nothing to most the members when a sample is sent to the tester from the supplier or non member. It can be manipulated from the supplier. It's obviously overdosed. What do you think this does besides drive sales to the source?

2. I apologize I thought earlier he stated that he was sending you one? Was it a member from meso? I highly doubt it.

3. I did and I posted the results not the tester nor did I post it in the underground section to facilitate sales.

4. I agree.

5. Actually I was referring to @Analyzer. He was reamed for doing the same thing you are. Posting for GT.

6. I saw where you asked and a member or two said they would love to see it.

7. It's an unspoken rule on this board as we don't have moderators to protect sources and testers.

8. My point was to tell you NOT to post on behalf of a source or a non member here at MESO.

We good now?

mands

My fault man... I just wanted him to post for comparison to Analyzer's. Everyone should take both results with a grain of salt

 

[janoshik]

1. That's not determined by you as a tester to ask. It means nothing to most the members when a sample is sent to the tester from the supplier or non member. It can be manipulated from the supplier. It's obviously overdosed. What do you think this does besides drive sales to the source?

2. I apologize I thought earlier he stated that he was sending you one? Was it a member from meso? I highly doubt it.

3. I did and I posted the results not the tester nor did I post it in the underground section to facilitate sales.

4. I agree.

5. Actually I was referring to @Analyzer. He was reamed for doing the same thing you are. Posting for GT.

6. I saw where you asked and a member or two said they would love to see it.

7. It's an unspoken rule on this board as we don't have moderators to protect sources and testers.

8. My point was to tell you NOT to post on behalf of a source or a non member here at MESO.

We good now?

mands

1. It means something to a guy who asked it. Anybody else is free to ignore it. Samples from Turkish Pharma could've been manipulated as well... but let's not go into it.

2. I tested 2 samples from him, it was the previous one that was directly from the source. The second one was sent to me by somebody who I am 100% sure is not on the GodTs payroll - I will not go into details in this in order to protect the customer.

3. I don't play by that kind of rules, because... well I don't get the point.

Results, wherever posted and by whomever will influence sales. I was in direct discussion with people here and I wanted to add some value to it. GodT certainly did not ask me to post it here.

5. Well, can I get reamed any more than I got already?
I don't think so, so I don't really mind it, but thank you about thinking about my well-being.

Anyway, managed to get a rant in there, so shame on me.

7. I am not really aware about the unspoken rules here.

8. I posted on my and my behalf only. Like I said, GodT didn't ask me to post it here.

Guess that's it, so we good

Thank you for replying in points as well, helps me keep track and stay away from misunderstandings.

 

[mands]

1. It means something to a guy who asked it. Anybody else is free to ignore it. Samples from Turkish Pharma could've been manipulated as well... but let's not go into it.

2. I tested 2 samples from him, it was the previous one that was directly from the source. The second one was sent to me by somebody who I am 100% sure is not on the GodTs payroll - I will not go into details in this in order to protect the customer.

3. I don't play by that kind of rules, because... well I don't get the point.

Results, wherever posted and by whomever will influence sales. I was in direct discussion with people here and I wanted to add some value to it. GodT certainly did not ask me to post it here.

5. Well, can I get reamed any more than I got already?
I don't think so, so I don't really mind it, but thank you about thinking about my well-being.

Anyway, managed to get a rant in there, so shame on me.

7. I am not really aware about the unspoken rules here.

8. I posted on my and my behalf only. Like I said, GodT didn't ask me to post it here.

Guess that's it, so we good

Thank you for replying in points as well, helps me keep track and stay away from misunderstandings.

I will NOT go round and round with you on this. Why, because you are type of fella that needs to have the last word. I could post a rebuttal to yours but I won't.

If you want to contribute here and not pedal your services that's great. Just learn the code of conduct here and then there won't be any problems. You can reply to this and get the last word. I will not reply again to you in this thread.

Members here see what you are trying to do. It's okay.

mands

 

[janoshik]

I will NOT go round and round with you on this. Why, because you are type of fella that needs to have the last word. I could post a rebuttal to yours but I won't.

If you want to contribute here and not pedal your services that's great. Just learn the code of conduct here and then there won't be any problems. You can reply to this and get the last word. I will not reply again to you in this thread.

Members here see what you are trying to do. It's okay.

mands

That's why I literally said "that's it we good," jesus man, chill.

You got your message out and I got mine and that's it.

 

[Naugahyde]

I think he took most of the heat because of that bad testing that @Dr JIM had conducted.

Don't get me wrong - the testing method that was done is not bad by itself - but it was used for completely unsuitable purpose.

'The testing method ( Hgh Assay Dr Jim/Mands )..not bad by itself but...used for unsuitable purpose' Apologies Jano but not sure I understand this? You mean the protocol was good but not - what exactly? I thought in fact you were criticizing the testing methods used?

 

[janoshik]

'The testing method ( Hgh Assay Dr Jim/Mands )..not bad by itself but...used for unsuitable purpose' Apologies Jano but not sure I understand this? You mean the protocol was good but not - what exactly? I thought in fact you were criticizing the testing methods used?

AAA is good for some things, testing HGH is not one of them, that's what I meant.

Just like using a rake is good for garden work, but you ain't gonna use it to dig a hole, you'll use a shovel, even though it is still being garden work.

I cannot criticize AAA for just existing - it has its purposes.
I criticized the choice of AAA and mostly I criticized claims of AAA being superior or being able to deliver accurate results.

If the claim was along the lines that AAA can give rough idea about the contents of the vial, which can help people with deciding whom to get HGH from it would not be possible for me to have a single objection.

However lies were (and are) being spread and a smear campaign was started immediately after I pointed out my objections. A simple look on how many quotations and references could each side of the argument provide will give you perspective. Another look on the amount of ad hominems and similar fallacies will help as well.

Please, if you wish to discuss this further, let's take it into PMs, so we don't go full on off topic here.

 

[Naugahyde]

AAA is good for some things, testing HGH is not one of them, that's what I meant.

Just like using a rake is good for garden work, but you ain't gonna use it to dig a hole, you'll use a shovel, even though it is still being garden work.

I cannot criticize AAA for just existing - it has its purposes.
I criticized the choice of AAA and mostly I criticized claims of AAA being superior or being able to deliver accurate results.

If the claim was along the lines that AAA can give rough idea about the contents of the vial, which can help people with deciding whom to get HGH from it would not be possible for me to have a single objection.

However lies were (and are) being spread and a smear campaign was started immediately after I pointed out my objections. A simple look on how many quotations and references could each side of the argument provide will give you perspective. Another look on the amount of ad hominems and similar fallacies will help as well.

Please, if you wish to discuss this further, let's take it into PMs, so we don't go full on off topic here.

Thanks for clarifying. No problem, will do.

 

[Rockclimber]

3 weeks. Happy with number, just thought it would be higher

Hey brother, I came across an older thread with some very interesting numbers. I'm still reading it but thought you would find these igf numbers interesting:
Testing IGF-1 levels on Black Top Meditrope