Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

[Juiced_lizard]

All the boxes have codes on them. There is lists of them all. Hold on I’ll quote them

Here are oils. It didn’t list SKUs for tabs or raws

Bumping this also

I believe people have added to this list somewhere in the thread.

 

[Muscleman69]

What are you hoping to get out of 2.5 ius of growth??????

I’ve seen countless Reddit threads suggesting that 2–3 IU is the sweet spot for lipolysis. In my experience, it wasn’t until the rise of extremely affordable Chinese suppliers that higher doses—like 8 IU—became more common. Based on my research, 2.5 IU seems to be a solid “replacement plus” dose for maintaining fat loss during a bulk. But if you have different insights, I’d love to learn!

 

[dumpmutt]

To my surprise I received my products from qsc but how do I know which peptide is which?
I ordered bpc/tb, reta, epitalon and thymosin alpha 1. Obviously I’m missing one but I’m not stressing that just need to know what’s what.

I got screamed at in this thread for describing the label on test vials but it's cool to just post pics

 

[Proud_papa_pump]

I believe people have added to this list somewhere in the thread.

 

[Ateam2023]

To my surprise I received my products from qsc but how do I know which peptide is which?
I ordered bpc/tb, reta, epitalon and thymosin alpha 1. Obviously I’m missing one but I’m not stressing that just need to know what’s what.

your asking about 4 different peptides and only have 3 pictures?

 

[Bigoldguy]

@Ghoul I am sure @janoshik is a lying pos protecting UGLs and your fear mongering "facts" are correct, right?!?

j

 

[chumpsickel]

Don’t listen to his shit. Lobster is one of few vendors consistently selling high quality HGH. From what I remember there was one member who reported a single vial without vacuum. After that dozens of members have ordered and found no issues. Ghoul doesn’t buy HGH from anyone. He doesn’t use HGH. He doesn’t test any products. He just spouts nonsense he reads on the internet all day.

It was not a single vial; it has been every vial I have reconstituted. There were others that received vials without vacuum, but I don't think they wanted to come forward to voice their concerns after they observed the treatment I received.

I submitted 2 vials to Jano, and only 1 was tested to my knowledge. How can we know that 2 were not tested and only the best result was submitted? Also, how do you explain Lobster conveniently coming up with vials that he could not produce earlier? I think he is honestly just trying to protect his business. The vial I submitted came back with less than stellar results and I assume everyone thinks that I didn't store it properly. On my honor, I stored in the refrigerator as soon as I received it and even shipped my vials to Jano express shipping at Lobsters insistence. Let's not forget, that when they were shipped to me, they were not shipped express, and spent weeks in transit.

I have no doubt that Lobster produces some of the best GH on this forum, but I don't think he is infallible. He produced vials that had no vacuum and it was brought to the attention of the board before I made my purchase. I purchased after it was stated that the product in January would have vacuum. I was surprised when I reconstituted to find I was mislead. It was even stated that it would be a good idea to make buyers of the affected vials aware of the issue before purchase; that did not happen.

There are those that have said they would still use the product and honestly what choice do I have? It would be hard to justify throwing out GH that I paid good money for. I like that it reconstitutes crystal clear and no bubble form, but I do believe it either degraded from no vacuum or it was less than optimal when it was produced. My problem is I was under the assumption I would be getting the best there was to offer and not something that was already questioned by another member. Imagine ordering something from Amazon or any other online retailer and it comes to you with a defect. Would you accept the defect because it will still work, or would you want an undamaged product. Maybe a discount could have been offered for subpar GH.

I have lost faith in the members of this board that I originally had some regard for. I thought I was part of a harm reduction board where members had each others backs. There are some members here that do seem to be interested in harm reduction, but they are constantly criticized and I honestly don't know why they even bother trying to help. If there are those that find the harm reduction members annoying, why not just ignore them? I think if this would have been some other vendor, members would have stuck with me, but obviously there are people here that will believe anything Lobster tells them and are ready to bring out the pitchforks anytime he is questioned.

 

[narta]

I submitted 2 vials to Jano, and only 1 was tested to my knowledge. How can we know that 2 were not tested and only the best result was submitted?

@janoshik

 

[Kylesmith1985]

View attachment 322196

Is there a sku list for the anabolics? I still have 2 kits of oils I have no idea what they are as qsc gave me no response.

 

[janoshik]

@janoshik

By submitting the order yourself blind

 

[glpfun]

I ordered right before they cut out. I ordered test E. On my labels it says esssential oils (which I understand is discreet shipping) but in smaller print in parenthesis it’s labeled (Tren-H). The liquid is clear so I’m just confused. Why would they put the name of a different illegal substance on the bottle if it was not in fact said substance? I’ve just been on 50mg for 3 days and feel pretty pissy so just worried I’m doing Tren lol.

Oh look another person incapable of using the search function

 

[Proud_papa_pump]

Is there a sku list for the anabolics? I still have 2 kits of oils I have no idea what they are as qsc gave me no response.

 

[AlexDavis43]

Don’t listen to his shit. Lobster is one of few vendors consistently selling high quality HGH. From what I remember there was one member who reported a single vial without vacuum. After that dozens of members have ordered and found no issues. Ghoul doesn’t buy HGH from anyone. He doesn’t use HGH. He doesn’t test any products. He just spouts nonsense he reads on the internet all day.

It was not a single vial; it has been every vial I have reconstituted. There were others that received vials without vacuum, but I don't think they wanted to come forward to voice their concerns after they observed the treatment I received.

I submitted 2 vials to Jano, and only 1 was tested to my knowledge. How can we know that 2 were not tested and only the best result was submitted? Also, how do you explain Lobster conveniently coming up with vials that he could not produce earlier? I think he is honestly just trying to protect his business. The vial I submitted came back with less than stellar results and I assume everyone thinks that I didn't store it properly. On my honor, I stored in the refrigerator as soon as I received it and even shipped my vials to Jano express shipping at Lobsters insistence. Let's not forget, that when they were shipped to me, they were not shipped express, and spent weeks in transit.

I have no doubt that Lobster produces some of the best GH on this forum, but I don't think he is infallible. He produced vials that had no vacuum and it was brought to the attention of the board before I made my purchase. I purchased after it was stated that the product in January would have vacuum. I was surprised when I reconstituted to find I was mislead. It was even stated that it would be a good idea to make buyers of the affected vials aware of the issue before purchase; that did not happen.

There are those that have said they would still use the product and honestly what choice do I have? It would be hard to justify throwing out GH that I paid good money for. I like that it reconstitutes crystal clear and no bubble form, but I do believe it either degraded from no vacuum or it was less than optimal when it was produced. My problem is I was under the assumption I would be getting the best there was to offer and not something that was already questioned by another member. Imagine ordering something from Amazon or any other online retailer and it comes to you with a defect. Would you accept the defect because it will still work, or would you want an undamaged product. Maybe a discount could have been offered for subpar GH.

I have lost faith in the members of this board that I originally had some regard for. I thought I was part of a harm reduction board where members had each others backs. There are some members here that do seem to be interested in harm reduction, but they are constantly criticized and I honestly don't know why they even bother trying to help. If there are those that find the harm reduction members annoying, why not just ignore them? I think if this would have been some other vendor, members would have stuck with me, but obviously there are people here that will believe anything Lobster tells them and are ready to bring out the pitchforks anytime he is questioned.

What does this mean:

Also, how do you explain Lobster conveniently coming up with vials that he could not produce earlier?

Are you talking about the vacuumless 50 IU vial that showed no deterioration after 6 months?




Otherwise as long as you're using it within 6 months, these tests suggest it should be good.

Also, Serostim is like 3% dimer and your vial was way less than that iirc.

 

[Kylesmith1985]

View attachment 322205

Thanks but thats not congruent with the Skus I have. My skus are 8670/MAT2 and 8975/MAD7

 

[Juiced_lizard]

Thanks but thats not congruent with the Skus I have. My skus are 8670/MAT2 and 8975/MAD7

What did you order?

 

[BamaCrazy]

It was not a single vial; it has been every vial I have reconstituted. There were others that received vials without vacuum, but I don't think they wanted to come forward to voice their concerns after they observed the treatment I received.

I submitted 2 vials to Jano, and only 1 was tested to my knowledge. How can we know that 2 were not tested and only the best result was submitted? Also, how do you explain Lobster conveniently coming up with vials that he could not produce earlier? I think he is honestly just trying to protect his business. The vial I submitted came back with less than stellar results and I assume everyone thinks that I didn't store it properly. On my honor, I stored in the refrigerator as soon as I received it and even shipped my vials to Jano express shipping at Lobsters insistence. Let's not forget, that when they were shipped to me, they were not shipped express, and spent weeks in transit.

I have no doubt that Lobster produces some of the best GH on this forum, but I don't think he is infallible. He produced vials that had no vacuum and it was brought to the attention of the board before I made my purchase. I purchased after it was stated that the product in January would have vacuum. I was surprised when I reconstituted to find I was mislead. It was even stated that it would be a good idea to make buyers of the affected vials aware of the issue before purchase; that did not happen.

There are those that have said they would still use the product and honestly what choice do I have? It would be hard to justify throwing out GH that I paid good money for. I like that it reconstitutes crystal clear and no bubble form, but I do believe it either degraded from no vacuum or it was less than optimal when it was produced. My problem is I was under the assumption I would be getting the best there was to offer and not something that was already questioned by another member. Imagine ordering something from Amazon or any other online retailer and it comes to you with a defect. Would you accept the defect because it will still work, or would you want an undamaged product. Maybe a discount could have been offered for subpar GH.

I have lost faith in the members of this board that I originally had some regard for. I thought I was part of a harm reduction board where members had each others backs. There are some members here that do seem to be interested in harm reduction, but they are constantly criticized and I honestly don't know why they even bother trying to help. If there are those that find the harm reduction members annoying, why not just ignore them? I think if this would have been some other vendor, members would have stuck with me, but obviously there are people here that will believe anything Lobster tells them and are ready to bring out the pitchforks anytime he is questioned.

There have been several recent tests that have had very good results. I keep hearing about these other members who received product without a vacuum but I have yet to see proof they exist. I really don’t think anyone is afraid to report vials without vacuum. We’ve all received peptides without vacuum so it’s not a controversial topic. What’s controversial is whether there is loss of purity or effectiveness, or if there is potential harm.

And nobody has a problem with someone trying to reduce risks for our members. But some people just pretend to be experts about things they read online or ChatGPT produced. They are not customers of these sources. They don’t use the products they are criticizing, they don’t test shit, they don’t even test the products they use on themselves. They regurgitate things they read online and cause unnecessary drama and confusion. If you don’t have any skin in the game STFU.

 

[Kylesmith1985]

What did you order?

Test Cyp and Mast P USA warehouse.

 

[glpfun]

Mast p is worthless cmv

 

[chumpsickel]

What does this mean:



Are you talking about the vacuumless 50 IU vial that showed no deterioration after 6 months?


View attachment 322204

Otherwise as long as you're using it within 6 months, these tests suggest it should be good.

Also, Serostim is like 3% dimer and your vial was way less than that iirc.

Did you not see the results of the vial I submitted? I am guessing you missed that because these are the only tests you are spreading around. I just think it is convenient that he just happened to find some vials that were supposedly from the same batch as mine. Believe what you want but how do you explain my vial testing subpar?

We are not discussing Serostim and I think most people are buying in hopes that the advertised testing is correct. I would think that if Serostim was saying it was 97% pure with no dimer, you might take issue with the results if they were not what was advertised.

Maybe a different analogy will help. Lets say you buy a new car and drive it home but there ends up being a scratch you did not see while it was on the car lot. Do you just accept it because it does not affect how the car operates? What you are telling me is I should live with the scratch because it does not affect the operation of the car.

If my vial does not demonstrate the potential for degradation with a vacuum less vial, then I guess it was never 97-98% purity and no dimer. Why not just buy the cheapest product there is if 95% purity and .214 dimer is acceptable?

 

[chumpsickel]

There have been several recent tests that have had very good results. I keep hearing about these other members who received product without a vacuum but I have yet to see proof they exist. I really don’t think anyone is afraid to report vials without vacuum. We’ve all received peptides without vacuum so it’s not a controversial topic. What’s controversial is whether there is loss of purity or effectiveness, or if there is potential harm.

And nobody has a problem with someone trying to reduce risks for our members. But some people just pretend to be experts about things they read online or ChatGPT produced. They are not customers of these sources. They don’t use the products they are criticizing, they don’t test shit, they don’t even test the products they use on themselves. They regurgitate things they read online and cause unnecessary drama and confusion. If you don’t have any skin in the game STFU.

I have had members contact me privately asking about the testing results before they came out. Why didn't they just post their question on the thread? Pitchforks is why.