Steroid Profile Anadrol

So for the first 3 days I've taken 50, 75, and 100mg pre-workout. I will stay at 100mg moving forward. My plan is to run something similar to what was mentioned at the beginning of this thread doing 4 days anadrol and 3 days anavar. For reference, my anavar dosage is 50mg pre-workout. I will do this for around 4-6 weeks barring any crazy issues.

As far as results thus far, I've noticed I can add a couple more reps but I've not seen any crazy strength increase. I do feel more focused and I'm definitely looking full and more veiny, but besides these things I don't have any crazy results to add here at least early on. I'm currently bulking on 500mg test and 500mg primo using a reverse diet so my food intake is pretty in tact and I just reached about a 500 calorie surplus. With all these factors it makes it hard to pinpoint exactly which is responsible for what.

I haven't had any negative side effects such as higher blood pressure or extreme water retention, but I'm also on 5mg nebivolol daily to manage my heart rate which had increased due to 10iu HGH and my diet is pretty clean, along with decent cardio. All in all, I'm going to see this through and won't make a rash decision about anadrol based on this limited experience.
 
I've only used oxandrolone during a cut so far. For anyone that used oxymetholone in a cut, did you use it along with stanozolol or drostanolone or anything to minimize water retention or bloat? Or do you find it's not really an issue in a large calorie deficit? Also why use oxy over oxa in a cut? That might be the better question
 
Anadrol is my favorite oral steroid, bar none.

For me, anadrol, NPP and test is everything you could ever want in an AAS stack.

I've not found that it slabs on tons of weight, like dbol is better known for. However, it's the epitome of a performance enhancer. Thus, you'll make the other drugs in the stack go further and can expect more quality muscle tissue to form.

I agree with Bill Roberts that it's harshness is often overblown, or at least it used to be.. Maybe less so recently. However, I've noticed a trend that some guys don't tolerate it as well... In which case, they tend to tolerate dbol better. The opposite seems to often match up too where when dbol isn't well tolerated, anadrol will be.

I've also found it kind of intriguing that Larry Wheels has stated that his "cruise" compounds are 500mg of test and 150mg of anadrol. Kind of a testament to it's use in powerlifter, IMO.

Anadrol… makes my blood thick like tar… no can doosville babydoll
 
Na water wont remove hematocrit and reduce rbc… thats the whole issue… maybe ad teli bp meds perhaps…
Water/hydration will. Hematocrit is the percentage of rbcs in your blood. When dehydrated plasma goes down so total RBC percentage rises. When hydrated or over hydrated plasma goes up in the blood lowering the percentage of rbcs so you get a lower hematocrit. That's why you never ever test your hematocrit fasted overnight first thing in the morning because you pee out all your water and are dehydrated by morning. You want to have plenty of water all the way up to the test. You drink a gallon of water before getting tested and you won't have high hematocrit
 
Water/hydration will. Hematocrit is the percentage of rbcs in your blood. When dehydrated plasma goes down so total RBC percentage rises. When hydrated or over hydrated plasma goes up in the blood lowering the percentage of rbcs so you get a lower hematocrit. That's why you never ever test your hematocrit fasted overnight first thing in the morning because you pee out all your water and are dehydrated by morning. You want to have plenty of water all the way up to the test. You drink a gallon of water before getting tested and you won't have high hematocrit
I think there's a middle ground. I show up to tests well hydrated but not a gallon of water onboard hydrated. Because at that point I'm just cheating the test really, if I just chugged enough water I could theoretically push down almost any level of concerning erythropoeisis if that makes sense.

If I'm waking up with horrible looking bloodwork until I get a gallon of water in me, that's not really "good" bloodwork, that just means I'm in the danger zone every morning until I get that water in me. That said, if I'm rocking 47% hematocrit with a reasonable amount of hydration, then I can know I'm probably at most walking around with a ~51% which I'm not terribly concerned about.
 
Platelet count is the more pertinent metric anyway, I don’t pay attention to hematocrit.
I think it all depends on the numbers and it's not that one is more important than the other. If your platelets are low-middle and hematocrit is 53%, yeah I wouldn't worry much either. But if my hematocrit was 59% and plateletes were still normal? Can't say I'd just shrug that off.

Though I guess in pseudo-agreement with you, while I think hematocrit requires a little nuance, sky high platelets would almost always be cause for alarm.
 
I think it all depends on the numbers and it's not that one is more important than the other. If your platelets are low-middle and hematocrit is 53%, yeah I wouldn't worry much either. But if my hematocrit was 59% and plateletes were still normal? Can't say I'd just shrug that off.

Though I guess in pseudo-agreement with you, while I think hematocrit requires a little nuance, sky high platelets would almost always be cause for alarm.
That’s what I mean, I guess I shouldn’t say I completely disregard hematocrit. Platelet count is a much more straightforward metric that I think provides more valuable insight for clotting/stroke risk.
 
Back
Top