MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Labmax test results
- Thread starter Gunrunner
- Start date
Thanks for checking my work. I was worried no one was doing that. This is why I post pics of every test. The color charts are rather ambiguous, and need some history before we can trust our interpretations. I suggested pics and videos to labmax as better options than a printed color chart. I have tried to video these tests myself, but have bungled every attempt. I think Murphy lives under my desk..
The GP mast "could" still be masteron, but with very low concentration IMO. All the other masteron samples I tested turned the A test obviously bright green very quickly then changed before I could get the camera in place. The green in the GP test is the final color 10 minutes after I added the sample.
The UV is difficult to get on camera, but in this case the orange I expected just wasn't there.
In any case, everyone should understand these tests are only as accurate as our interpretations of them. I should NOT be the only person doing them. I owuld recommend, strongly, if you plan to run a cycle and you are unsure of your lab (which you always should be), buy enough single tests to verify at least the non-testosteron aas you plan to use. Test them, and post the results.
Last edited:
DigEm
New Member
Haha ya. No one wants bunk shit. Wanted to see what all the fuss was about. You guys seem like you're really tryin to help. That's bad news for AMA and SX HAHA
I posted this before, but it's worth repeating. I tested AMA mast p AFTER I ran a cycle with it. I got blood work and saw exactly the results I expected, and that mast was the only addition to TRT protocol with known and very stable TT and FT levels. I believed AMA had closed shop when I tested it, but I wanted a baseline from something I "knew" was legit. I can't explain that discrepancy. All I can do is show the results of the test.
I think it's too bad AMA took the aggressive position they did on this. If they had wanted a decent rep here, they could have worked with us and figured out the problem. Now that I've been called (on other boards) every bad thing they can think of without ever talking to me it's probably too late. It's pretty clear they're not interested in selling quality gear, or listening to their customers. They should stay on boards where every unhappy customer ends up banned.
I think it's too bad AMA took the aggressive position they did on this. If they had wanted a decent rep here, they could have worked with us and figured out the problem. Now that I've been called (on other boards) every bad thing they can think of without ever talking to me it's probably too late. It's pretty clear they're not interested in selling quality gear, or listening to their customers. They should stay on boards where every unhappy customer ends up banned.
I've been in contact with both AMA and SX about lab results ans still no response. I tested the SX Deca and it was bunk. Seriously why bunk Deca as it's not an expensive compound. They both sponser and control other boards, but they have no pull here. On other boards they will lock a thread down, delete post and fuck it's members over. No source has control of Meso and that is why it is my favorite board and one of only 4 that I use.
Which AMA Lab are we talking? alphamalecrew.com ?
whwlives
New Member
Taking the blue out of these UV photos
First,
If you can get your hands on a fluorescent tube UV blacklight (think "the 70's) use that instead of a handheld UV light. You can sometimes find little battery powered fluorescent tube lights as "urine detectors" in a pet store.
I think I'm going to play around a bit to see if there is a combo of CHEAP filters that will work as you don't want to see the price(s) of "UV excitation filters" - which are what is used for this exact sort of thing - taking pictures of the excited fluorescence vs the UV light.
WHW
First,
If you can get your hands on a fluorescent tube UV blacklight (think "the 70's) use that instead of a handheld UV light. You can sometimes find little battery powered fluorescent tube lights as "urine detectors" in a pet store.
I think I'm going to play around a bit to see if there is a combo of CHEAP filters that will work as you don't want to see the price(s) of "UV excitation filters" - which are what is used for this exact sort of thing - taking pictures of the excited fluorescence vs the UV light.
WHW
Re: Taking the blue out of these UV photos
edit: nm
edit: nm
Mike Oxbig
New Member
Yes.
mercury
New Member
I am sure that you do not position your UV light correctly; I had personally a little problem with that UV. Actually the UV light is a little tricky to see the fluorescence.
I am sure that you have good masteron I did test my masteron propionate and it had the same colors, first I could not see the orange under UV but I came later when I tried the UV light with different angle and in dark room.
It took me a little time to figure out the UV light. You have to concentrate the light just on the vial, you cannot just move the vial to the UV light and expect to see the color.
Well, I definitely position the light incorrectly to get a decent pic of the florescent color. Though I can usually find an angle that lets me see it with my own eyes - or my second observer. But I agree it's possible I missed seeing the color due to bad light positioning. Lets compare the GP mast P A/B tests with the ones posted by labmax. If you think they are comparable, I will rerun the B test with the UV light.
labmax a/b
GP A
GP B
BIGMESC
New Member
Flenser,
Are you going to test Astro's EQ anytime soon.
PM me when you get a chance
Are you going to test Astro's EQ anytime soon.
PM me when you get a chance
I'm more a fan of deca. I don't have any EQ from Astro.
I encourage EVERYONE to invest in one of these kits the same way they would invest in their PCT or AI's. Even if a source checks clear for Labmax one month, you never know if they switch powder sources 3 months later and its no longer a legit product.
Every new lab from this point forward should undergo this test initially. No exceptions. If they don't do it its probably because they are not secure in their product.
Step 2 should be for them to require to send their 4 - 15 products to a third party lab for Mass Spec testing where an anonymous email address created by a or several MESO members can be CC'd the results directly from the lab.
This is not a fool proof method because the source may choose to go cheap and switch powders (which is why labmax can still be an indicator) but its another hoop we can make sources jump to ensure MESO sources are the best.
Too many times I see source threads have a shitload of pointless talk (not that there is anything wrong with that) only to find out many months later MESO members got screwed... AGAIN.
These sources makes 10's of thousands and even millions of dollars sometimes. We'll probably lose out on alot of potential sources but the ones that make the cut are the cream of the crop. The elite.
I know there is a % of users on here that don't care and just want free shit because hey.. who doesen't like free shit ? But our higher standards can potentially save a life aside from saving money and time lost on a bunk cycle.
Opinions / thoughts ?
P.S. Everyone buying tests and posting here. My hats and respect to you. Many cannot afford these kits and your helping them stay safe.
Every new lab from this point forward should undergo this test initially. No exceptions. If they don't do it its probably because they are not secure in their product.
Step 2 should be for them to require to send their 4 - 15 products to a third party lab for Mass Spec testing where an anonymous email address created by a or several MESO members can be CC'd the results directly from the lab.
This is not a fool proof method because the source may choose to go cheap and switch powders (which is why labmax can still be an indicator) but its another hoop we can make sources jump to ensure MESO sources are the best.
Too many times I see source threads have a shitload of pointless talk (not that there is anything wrong with that) only to find out many months later MESO members got screwed... AGAIN.
These sources makes 10's of thousands and even millions of dollars sometimes. We'll probably lose out on alot of potential sources but the ones that make the cut are the cream of the crop. The elite.
I know there is a % of users on here that don't care and just want free shit because hey.. who doesen't like free shit ? But our higher standards can potentially save a life aside from saving money and time lost on a bunk cycle.
Opinions / thoughts ?
P.S. Everyone buying tests and posting here. My hats and respect to you. Many cannot afford these kits and your helping them stay safe.
mercury
New Member
I agree many times I was recommended good gear, maybe it was good a year ago, when I got it it was only oil inside
You can also buy single test vials from labmax for $20, but anyway the kit cost less that 2 fake vials, if you can afford to buy junk gear then you can afford this kit
