Mike Oxbig
New Member
Has anyone tested any of Bio's gear that's been received after the clusterfuck? If he actually went scammer and won't be back he may of been sending out olive oil during the latter part of the operation.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Labmax test results
- Thread starter Gunrunner
- Start date
My problem with Legend is their rep, joebad1, on another board is busy trashing the labmax tests and anyone involved with them. Until that changes, I'm not interested in buying or testing any of their products.
Maybe they could offer a replacement vial for the first one to test each aas. Some kind of store credit after the fact should limit suspicion they are sending the tester different aas than they actually sell.
Edit: NM, I just saw the thread where he agreed to exactly what I just said.
Last edited:
mercury
New Member
you are welcomed on board too.
I am waiting for some gear to come over, I do not mind to post some results.
The problem with most gear is that it might be good today but not tomorrow.
They lose shipment of powder, seized by customes and they sell plain oil
I was recommended good gear but when I got it it was plain oil inside.
Now I buy one vial it if it is good I go for rest, no more waisting money.
drizzy
New Member
Mike Oxbig
Has anyone tested any of Bio's gear that's been received after the clusterfuck? If he actually went scammer and won't be back he may of been sending out olive oil during the latter part of the operation.
Me too I'm very curious,
Has anyone tested any of Bio's gear that's been received after the clusterfuck? If he actually went scammer and won't be back he may of been sending out olive oil during the latter part of the operation.
Me too I'm very curious,
Yes there is always the risk of testing passing and the source going bad soon after.
Every source, at least initially, with their said inventory, should be tested because at least we'll know if said item for sale has the respective oil. We may not know the mg. Or if its sterile. But its better than knowing nothing at all and just injecting.
Or how about making the source pay for a testing kit... To send it to a respected member.. and respected member receives 1 of each of their product to test ?
I've pleaded multiple times for testers but crickets.... I have test kits but a) onus should not fall on one person all the time and b) the person harassing the source should not put himself in a position of receiving gear to test as he/she receives a hot pack for revenge for rough questioning.
BIGMESC
New Member
I have mine in the freezer to see if they will crash but I do not have a test kit.....yet
I know labmax has a way to credit accounts. He gave me a discount on the last kit I ordered by giving me a credit. If someone orders gear from a UGL and wants to test that gear, the UGL should be able to credit his labmax account for the cost of the test. I'm sure most UGLs would prefer to send out free gear, though.
Interesting... Was thinking as I was doing laundry... Not only in the beginning of them coming on here should they be tested but ongoing... Monthly ? Randomly....
drizzy
New Member
Bigmesc keep us posted my biologic tren e hasn't maid much of a difference at all and I'm going on week 3
Raider72
New Member
What's up with the GP Test E??
What happened to not informing the source about which vials were to be tested? This is one of the key points with keeping the integrity of the test?
When reading this i was thinking about that also. Don't let the source know.
The test will be useless. Same with these fucking places that claim to have their shit tested by labs and they have the proof. Fuck that. That's good for their peace of mind. Means dick to us. There are templates exist and these fucks just fill in the blanks.
It's that or they give a legit sample and then the shit goes to members, This is how the scams with gh work at promuscle. The samples sent for testimg is good. The members get the shit
It's that or they give a legit sample and then the shit goes to members, This is how the scams with gh work at promuscle. The samples sent for testimg is good. The members get the shit
If anything the sources should buy the testing kits and send those out to ppl.
The members would still need to test. That doesn't change. But having a baseline is useful. A UGL is done the first time it sells gear that doesn't match the baseline.
Ok let me be more thorough here...
Ok say John Dingle wants to sell gear in Meso. He posts today. First Post:
Hi I am John Dingle.
I sell the best:
Tren Q
Tren F
Test Z
Primo 8
.
.
.
.
.
This guy may be selling EQ as Mast E.
The initial test is really only meant to ensure a) he is willing to send out something to be tested and b) the powder the source thinks he has matches whats in the vial.
Because if he does not cooperate... and he stalls.. or stutters.. its probably because he is broke or knows his gear on hand won't pass labmax.
Ok so lets say Flenser recives 14 different compounds. We test them out and they are all legit. It does not end there. Its just step 1 to catch them in a lie or stalling..
So as people buy.. due to the credit we have with Labmax thanks to the source, we can send a random member a labmax test.. continuing testing.. Never ending.. Lab max account being refilled by the source.
Maybe I am not being clear here. If a source sends his powder to be tested, by an INTERNATIONAL LAB, and the LAB cc's a member (via email)the results.. at least we know the source HAS access to the right powder sources somehow. Also its not the Source providing labs, its the LAB sending US the results.
Of course.. the source can still turn around go to another powder supplier or just to fill everything with Olive oil..
The thing is.. right now.. there are NO protections. These protections are not fool proof.
Also I've seen scams unfold on Pro Muscle. The difference is that here if someone complains, it won't get deleted, and it can trigger deeper tests / scrutiny.
Why ask for Pics ? A) To ensure they are not selling us their first brew. To ensure they have decent equipment. B) If a source fails and tries to come back the pics of the setup will be enough to identify them so in reality to come back and scam they will have to buy new equipment making the process expensive and annoying.
If anyone has other ideas for standardizing questioning / holding sources accountable please feel free to chime in. This is just my brainstorm and I am just 1 simple regular person with no ego trying to create a systematic way of holding sources accountable.
Ok say John Dingle wants to sell gear in Meso. He posts today. First Post:
Hi I am John Dingle.
I sell the best:
Tren Q
Tren F
Test Z
Primo 8
.
.
.
.
.
This guy may be selling EQ as Mast E.
The initial test is really only meant to ensure a) he is willing to send out something to be tested and b) the powder the source thinks he has matches whats in the vial.
Because if he does not cooperate... and he stalls.. or stutters.. its probably because he is broke or knows his gear on hand won't pass labmax.
Ok so lets say Flenser recives 14 different compounds. We test them out and they are all legit. It does not end there. Its just step 1 to catch them in a lie or stalling..
So as people buy.. due to the credit we have with Labmax thanks to the source, we can send a random member a labmax test.. continuing testing.. Never ending.. Lab max account being refilled by the source.
Maybe I am not being clear here. If a source sends his powder to be tested, by an INTERNATIONAL LAB, and the LAB cc's a member (via email)the results.. at least we know the source HAS access to the right powder sources somehow. Also its not the Source providing labs, its the LAB sending US the results.
Of course.. the source can still turn around go to another powder supplier or just to fill everything with Olive oil..
The thing is.. right now.. there are NO protections. These protections are not fool proof.
Also I've seen scams unfold on Pro Muscle. The difference is that here if someone complains, it won't get deleted, and it can trigger deeper tests / scrutiny.
Why ask for Pics ? A) To ensure they are not selling us their first brew. To ensure they have decent equipment. B) If a source fails and tries to come back the pics of the setup will be enough to identify them so in reality to come back and scam they will have to buy new equipment making the process expensive and annoying.
If anyone has other ideas for standardizing questioning / holding sources accountable please feel free to chime in. This is just my brainstorm and I am just 1 simple regular person with no ego trying to create a systematic way of holding sources accountable.
I like the credit somehow, whats the point of asking a source to send gear to be tested if they know it will be??? I'd prefer to keep this honest and test without personally knowing im being tested. I'll personally replace the bottle or pay for the kit to have every single one of my products tested. But I don't want to know until after the fact, that way you're testing what everyone gets, not what a source knows will be tested.
Im serious
Similar threads
Sponsors
Latest posts
-
-
Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic- Latest: Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
-
-
-