As promised, I tested PEP's Test Prop.
First, I'd like to say that I don't think that little bit of fluorescence in Bkent's test should meet the threshold for proof of Pass/Fail. For instance, I think the florescence should be as pronounced as on the website. But, I don't have much experience with this, so maybe guys like Flenser can weigh in.
This angers me, because I have a good amount of Pep gear on hand.
I don't have before/after pictures, take that for what it's worth, I don't give a fuck. I have one before picture and both vials, A and B, both look brown. It was too hard to see any fluorescence under UV light with Pep's shit, which since I didn't know what to expect from the test, I chose not to take a picture.
I fucked myself, because instead of using the test on a known source (Astro's Test E, which I have bloods to back-up that it's legit), I started with Pep's Test P, and since it was my first time, was initially unsure of how to interpret the results. There was little florescence, but mostly the vial was just brown, both under UV and normal light. There were little flecks of fluorescence, but mostly it was just brown. BTW, I have a rated UV light between 365nm-375nm.
Anyways, I saw LITTLE fluorescence on the Test P, not the glowing vials the website shows. After testing two different Pep Test P vials that came in my shipment, I decided to test Astro's Test E as a control. Astro's Test E displayed the pronounced fluorescence I expected from the test.
In my opinion, though it has hurt me for $400 in Pep Test P and Sustanon, I would have to say that PEP's TEST P was a FAIL. I ordered early January.
Before picture: Both look brown as shit. I use imgur, because it removes EXIF data.
http ://imgur.com/sYAPau7