Search results for query: Don't use ugl

Excellent comments. As you can see above we are doing endotoxin screen this go around on the raw along with the other stuff. I don't have a good solution yet for adequate class 1 and 2 residual solvents. What testing do you want to see on next go around? Makes no sense to do sterility on a...

Hey, here's a standard certificate of analysis for Pharma Test ester: https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/source-qc-and-c-of-a-do-you-have-one.134420333/post-3218268 A summary of these tests...

I've been looking at your product very closely as I consider UGL GH. I appreciate your honesty here. Sincerely. You may or may not be manufacturing in a GMP facility, but you are not providing a certificate of analysis compatible or comparable with USP standards as part of a GMP process. The...

Thank you so much for sharing all of this info and I am sorry this happened to you. It is inexcusable that after this event the inmates here haven't dictated to sources that sterility testing be par for the course for required testing. A source can't afford 240 usd to test batches of their...

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/source-qc-and-c-of-a-do-you-have-one.134420333/post-3178030 Been clear I haven't used UGL. If / when the space gets tested properly or I need to out of necessity (FDA closing down legal options) I may. I'll state again...I don't ask for metals...

I agree (although autistic is not the right descriptor in this context) and will defer to your considerable ugl experience. There probably aren't many ugl sources that don't mark concentration on their vials, correct? No serious vendor would use 200 mg instead of 200 mg/ml on their vial. I...

FYI All. Perhaps @Millard should "sticky" his words above. They are powerful. Do better @Sector instead of attempting to look cool with your "buddies". You are drinking from a firehose and that's OK. Nice to see some are coming around on the enhanced testing. Well done @Spaceman Spiff .

...again since I haven't plastered it in my profile... https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/axle-labs-us-domestic.134420781/post-3251805 I don't use UGL products, never have. Not forcing anyone. I'll pay for it myself though. Looking out for you all and myself if I ever do go that...

...when you decide to have a complete unknown ship free gear to an address of your choosing? Without revealing specifics, you are comfortable with that approach? Have you weighed the risks vs benefits? I am curious. Full disclosure: I don't use UGL products but find this whole area fascinating.

no one has done the properly powered and blinded RCT comparing ugl vs pharma equivalent to assess the incremental morbidity/mortality/toxicity risk posed by ugl gear. I agree any additional risk may manifest over years instead of days/weeks based on anecdotal data we have. As we know ugl has...

If you are really curious why I am here it's all in my "Source QC" thread. "Stirring up crap"? Yeah, it's pretty clear to me at this point that some really do believe this place is a source board; others seem to believe it serves a different purpose... Appears some in the Meso Community...

I don't think so. People have been injecting it for years in the Pharma space. And even more in the ugl realm. Very low acute toxicity. I would cast the potential concern level of any chemical you are injecting in terms of mg or mg/kg bodyweight and not in terms of the percentage of...

...Blinding can happen initially if I find a truly blind lab not on Meso. If/when volume picks up then blinding has a more realistic chance with Jano. Also a sticking point: I don't use UGL. Hence trying to work with someone who does have UGL products...source(s). Thanks for your thoughts.

Lmmfao. BTW just to be absolutely clear, I never offered to take anyone's money. I offered to donate money. I prefer to keep my online activity wrt AAS anonymous. Doesn't matter whether it is illegal or not. There is significant stigma attached to the use of AAS and my post count ain't...

Early days. It takes time with any new idea / approach. Not sure how many people on here find me unlikable and not one of my major concerns as an anonymous internet poster. My goals are to get my facts straight and provide the most accurate and helpful info I can. Those are my guiding...

First, thank you for your thoughtful comments. Yes, I think so. I'd summarize it as "you don't use UGL, so why are you here?" AND "you are going to jack up prices if this is implemented by sources; we ain't paying more". The vocal members also want me to do initial testing first to document...

Thanks for your feedback. Appears we have gone from 0 to something depending on what @Axle Labs ordered. Fyi... https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/axle-labs-us-domestic.134420781/post-3219087

You quoted my post on compounders. Was that just to respond to me or do your comments have something to do with that post? You want me to send my pharma stuff for testing? OR You wonder why I haven't ordered ugl raws to test with the assays I identified above with input from Jano? Yes I do...

Thanks for the feedback and confirming you did not read the thread. Besides a little back and forth with some of the abusive members, not once have I indicated I think I am smarter than everyone else. Not even close. Pure projection on your part. I have gone out of my way to provde details so...

moving here as per Millard'recommendation to maintain continuity. I also don't want to further clog Stanford's thread. See link below for C of A from routine QC check of Pharma vial: https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/source-qc-and-c-of-a-do-you-have-one.134420333/post-3218268 Yes...