10ml or 20ml or 30ml vials

No, If you use 13mm filter syringe for AAS oil you will filter max 10ml each filter if you are lucky. 33mm for AAS and 13mm for peptides. The rest is fine
Are the steps outlined specific to homebrews? Maybe my risk tolerance is high after a year of taking UGL gear raw with no adverse events but the first spike seems unnecessary.
 
Last edited:
Are the steps outlined specific to homebrews? Maybe my risk tolerance is high after a year of taking UGL gear raw with no adverse events but the first spike seems unnecessary.

No adverse events? I doubt you'd sense the incremental progress of, for instance, joint damage from reactive arthritis, or your organs being slowly degraded by microembolisms from injecting a steady supply of particulate contamination.

You mean "I haven't lost an ass cheek so everything's fine".

What do you think happens to the glass, rubber, and metal sub-visible particles you're injecting? They politely make their way to your digestive system for excretion? Or perhaps we evolved to develop "glass dissolving enzymes" that break those shards down and render them harmless?

IMG_9677.webpIMG_9678.webp
 
Last edited:
You know what the drawbacks of larger vials are.

More vial stopper insults so more rubber coring material.

More vial contamination.

Of course if saving a few euro's is the priority it begs the question of why are you bothering to refilter, BUT if you don't lend much weight to the potential risks you could save yourself that 10€ and get amber 30ml vials, which will cover a myriad of sins...

View attachment 293833


View attachment 293834


View attachment 293835

I always wondered what a microbe on Tren looked like…
 
It's not correct, vendor make blend brewing things together, that's a lot different than brewing separately and than mixing it together :)

It's not that much different.

Is it ok to mix together different compounds in the same vials?

Like 10ml of test C 10ml of tren E and 10ml of masteron E all mixed in the same multidose vial?

Yes. No big difference from mixing them in the same syringe.
 
No adverse events? I doubt you'd sense the incremental progress of, for instance, joint damage from reactive arthritis, or your organs being slowly degraded by microembolisms from injecting a steady supply of particulate contamination.

You mean "I haven't lost an ass cheek so everything's fine".

What do you think happens to the glass, rubber, and metal sub-visible particles you're injecting? They politely make their way to your digestive system for excretion? Or perhaps we evolved to develop "glass dissolving enzymes" that break those shards down and render them harmless?

View attachment 305448View attachment 305449
To be clear, I'm not discounting the risk entirely and interested in harm reduction. Just genuinely curious what the reasoning is for using two vial spikes as described by @PayPig99 if the oil makes it through a syringe filter at .22um from the first vial without issue. Is that unlikely? Totally on board with using a filtered spike on the vial you intend to administer from. I'm clumsy as fuck so I'd like to stick with 10ml vials and the mini spikes add up quickly...
 
Last edited:
To be clear, I'm not discounting the risk and interested in harm reduction. Just genuinely curious what the reasoning is for using two vial spikes as described by @PayPig99 if the oil makes it through a syringe filter at .22um from the first vial without issue. Is that unlikely? Totally on board with using a filtered spike on the vial you intend to administer from. I'm clumsy as fuck so I'd like stick with 10ml vials and that would come at a cost with this method.

The filtered vial spike serves two functions. One is the deal with the particulates from the new vial (or even existing vial if reused), second is to prevent the development of rubber coring particles from repeatedly penetrating the rubber stopper with the needle (this has the added benefit of not requiring a separate drawing needle, or keeping the needle sharp, if using one for both).

However, I recently came across a source of inexpensive vials that are certified particulate free by USP standards.

With these, it would be better to use a spike without a liquid filter.

 
The filtered vial spike serves two functions. One is the deal with the particulates from the new vial (or even existing vial if reused), second is to prevent the development of rubber coring particles from repeatedly penetrating the rubber stopper with the needle (this has the added benefit of not requiring a separate drawing needle, or keeping the needle sharp, if using one for both).

However, I recently came across a source of inexpensive vials that are certified particulate free by USP standards.

With these, it would be better to use a spike without a liquid filter.

Here's another good source for the same brand by the case
 
The filtered vial spike serves two functions. One is the deal with the particulates from the new vial (or even existing vial if reused), second is to prevent the development of rubber coring particles from repeatedly penetrating the rubber stopper with the needle (this has the added benefit of not requiring a separate drawing needle, or keeping the needle sharp, if using one for both).

However, I recently came across a source of inexpensive vials that are certified particulate free by USP standards.

With these, it would be better to use a spike without a liquid filter.

Not to belabor the point but I seem to be missing something. If I have no issues pushing oil from the source vial through the syringe filter, am I good to skip the first spike?
 
To be clear, I'm not discounting the risk entirely and interested in harm reduction. Just genuinely curious what the reasoning is for using two vial spikes as described by @PayPig99 if the oil makes it through a syringe filter at .22um from the first vial without issue. Is that unlikely? Totally on board with using a filtered spike on the vial you intend to administer from. I'm clumsy as fuck so I'd like to stick with 10ml vials and the mini spikes add up quickly...
There is no reason, I missed that.
 
Not to belabor the point but I seem to be missing something. If I have no issues pushing oil from the source vial through the syringe filter, am I good to skip the first spike?
Of course..the first spike in that step has no reason to exist
 
The filtered vial spike serves two functions. One is the deal with the particulates from the new vial (or even existing vial if reused), second is to prevent the development of rubber coring particles from repeatedly penetrating the rubber stopper with the needle (this has the added benefit of not requiring a separate drawing needle, or keeping the needle sharp, if using one for both).

However, I recently came across a source of inexpensive vials that are certified particulate free by USP standards.

With these, it would be better to use a spike without a liquid filter.

They are certified particulate free before using it, after I doubt it will be particulate free as coring can happen. So the liquid filter should still be used isn't it? Or am I missing something?
 
Of course..the first spike in that step has no reason to exist
Thanks...was starting to feel a little slow lol. For clarity, is the purpose of the syringe filter to ensure sterility?

They are certified particulate free before using it, after I doubt it will be particulate free as coring can happen. So the liquid filter should still be used isn't it? Or am I missing something?
Yeah I'd want to filter directly before administration regardless. Seems kind of pointless to go through all this and still have non-zero risk. And we're not exactly in the best regulatory climate atm.
 
Back
Top