I don't think I'm emotionally involved? I get irritated debating conspiracy theories and arguments with little basis of fact though. It leads to broad assumptions that are impossible to argue with because it's just someone saying something with nothing to back it up.
I gave you talking points and you looked over them to make some kind of obscure case against the regulation. You even go as far as telling me that this isn't an inconvenience for you, what are you arguing against it for then?
I didn't say you called me names, but you sure as shit weren't able to participate in the debate in a friendly manner.
I got drug into your rant, you tell me all my "incorrect" talking points are generated from the MSM, that I'm not an owner nor do I have a CDL and several other incorrect facts that really have no bearing on whether I can form an opinion on the topic anyways... Regardless, it showed me how little you know about my background and that you're pretty much just pulling shit out of your ass and throwing it at the wall, hoping it'll stick.
After reading a post full of incorrect assumptions pointed at me, I decided I was going to conclude the debate rather than bother wasting my time addressing each of them one by one only to be likely hit with a bunch more in a subsequent post.