Changland Technology Co., Ltd. (International, US domestic)

Our friend test our hgh 24iu and get result 73iu from Janoshik. Is there anything you want to say?
I'd say hire a better engineering. You think that's a good thing? I wouldn't be able to go to work if I accidentally took 36iu instead of 12iu


How in China of all places did this company find a rep with an IQ In the single digits. Aren't most of you doctors by the time you're 15?
 
I'd say hire a better engineering. You think that's a good thing? I wouldn't be able to go to work if I accidentally took 36iu instead of 12iu


How in China of all places did this company find a rep with an IQ In the single digits. Aren't most of you doctors by the time you're 15?
Stop showing off your IQ. You don't understand what I'm saying at all.
 
He's saying Janoshik made a mistake on the test.

I've seen a few tests recently where Janoshik had mistakes in identification, formatting, etc.

On the Sigma Audley post someone pointed out where he labeled Tirzepatide as HGH. Janoshik replied to the post and said he made a mistake.

Is that the case here? No idea.
 
He's saying Janoshik made a mistake on the test.

I've seen a few tests recently where Janoshik had mistakes in identification, formatting, etc.

On the Sigma Audley post someone pointed out where he labeled Tirzepatide as HGH. Janoshik replied to the post and said he made a mistake.

Is that the case here? No idea.

Hmm. That is a fair point, mistakes do happen with labs - in general - especially when they may be overloaded. It happens though it does not inspire confidence and it must be considered on case by case basis.

For example, once had to correct MZ BIOLABS and related company on a COA they were posting publicly with an extremely wrong chemical name on the title. The company was grateful for me noticing, but for me it was a really strange feeling. I wondered why nobody bothered to proof read, double check, or how it managed to sit incorrect and public facing for almost a week.

In the end I spoke up for harm reduction sake. The company claimed that the person testing at MZ BIOLABS had failed to edit or update the line of data that listed the full chemical name.

That may cause one wonder how exactly the test results and COA is created (digitally). Maybe different labs have different approach. I definitely do not know and I have no direct experience to assume either.

TLDR - in general - it may be appropriate to double check with a lab to make sure something was not a typo or left over data from a previous testing form.
 
Last edited:
Yes you're clearly 4 steps ahead of everyone Chris. With your wildly inaccurate peptides. 50% underdosed and 3x overdosed
With your understanding, you should read more of the following post
 
Back
Top