einstein1905
New Member
Geebee52 said:Thanks bros for your answers.
I've been L. Rea's client for a few months (I couldn't afford longer) and I can say I learned a lot (not enough because it's been short) and I've got much confidance in him. I'm a hard-gainer, a diabetic, I've only got one kindney working, I'm old and over-anxious. My body reacts very strongly to AAS (insulino-resistance, auto-immunity to gear) and after 4 weeks I start losing weight, therefore short cycles have been a must for me.
If Einstein has got contermeasures for longer cycles I'm quite ready to give it a try. Can you give me an example ?
But when I was L. Rea's client, each time I did nearly what he advised me to do (a supp or a gear product didn't arrive in time) I missed, each time I did it exactly it worked.
Now I have to be contented with following his books. I found controlled catabolic protocol in his last one.
Einstein you don't need to have money to publish a book ; I don't have money and I published several books (not on b'bg).
You're type II? What insulin(s) are you using, if any at this point?
You won't have an immune response to AAS itself. To mount an immune response to molecules of that size is very rare, let alone to molecules so extremely similar to endogenous molecules. if you had formed an immune response to AAS, there would be no 4 week lag before effects plateaued.
I'll just copy and paste a thread that just touches on the bones of it, but it's really all about using which compounds when...
"This was a recent post at AR, and I think it's an interesting topic, so I'm posting it up over here for anyone to add to or contradict:
Originally Posted by big k.l.g
Hi bros,
First most of us know that Androgen Receptor sites do not "burn out" this is hogwash in fact the opposite is true, the AR upregulate and muliply to make use of all the new high concentrations in blood....the reason you need to increace AS doses after a few cycles is because of the added muscle mass ( more AR sites) from previous cycle. NOW how do i keep on growing during a say 20 week cycle? Assuming diet, rest, training etc is good is there anything that can be done to maximize AAS caused growth? the one i know that slows down cycle muscle gains of is the SHBG increase, which i can combat with the use of proviron+insulin. Are there any other growth-slowing actions i should know about? thanks guys.
einstein1905:
I've posted my theory on AR receptors over prolonged exposure to supraphysiological doses of AAS over time. ARs are upregulated initially in response to increased ligand (AAS) concentrations. However, it's been shown in vitro (but not yet in vivo) that ARs do downregulate over time, when exposed to constant high levels of AAS (test). Androgens lower SHBG levels, whereas estrogens increase SHBG levels, so utilizing sufficient anti e's throughout a cycle can have advantages from many different standpoints. During an AAS cycle, if sufficient anti e's are used, your bioavailable AAS (akin to bioavailable test in a "natural" athlete) will be much higher than when not on cycle. SHBG will creep up over time, but your % bioavailable test should still be much higher than off cycle. A couple things to try during the latter half or latter 1/3 of a longer cycle would be to incorporate proviron and/or to slightly increase doses (but plan your starting doses with this in mind). I'm in no way a proponent of big doses. Your body seeks homeostasis by many mechanisms and will adjust to Xmg/wk of AAS. Increasing that dose after a long run at a constant dose has the potential to increase expression of ARs once again. Another thing that many do is to add in more androgenic compounds towards the end of their longer cycles, which can again lower SHBG levels in addition to providing their inherent anabolic and androgenic effects.
Originally Posted by TheMudMan
Also, another thing I have learned is when gains stop comming on it's ususally because your calorie intake needs to be bumped up.........
einstein1905:
This can't be stressed enough. I should have mentioned that before anything else I said. You NEED to maintain a fairly excessive positive caloric intake to grow big."
As for my comment about money to publish, I merely meant that just because someone publishes something, this doesn't make it any "truer". He doesn't post on the open boards, but he does browse them. There was a recent post at EF where someone had posted an article that Rea had written in response to many of his critics, and this response was nothing more than opinion at best. it wasn't at all substantiated.
I'm not in the same business as Rea....I'm not in competition with him, but it does bother me that some are so quick to assume that what he says is "best" simply because it's in publication
