MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
what source is this?Hello, my friend just tested our HGH in Janoshik and concentration was fine, purity about 97%, but dimer and related proteins also 3,39%. I can't find any info about it, is that normal amount or is that extreme or dangerous? What do they mean and what effects can it cause?
Thanks for help
P.S. I am using this gh about 2 years and no side effects, but maybe they will come in future? Any facts, articles or something?
They should be careful with their half-knowledge.
The proteins stick together because they are folded incorrectly during production.
Proteins are like a body's in-house Lego set. These large, complex molecules are made up of building blocks called amino acids. Most of the time, proteins fold correctly, but sometimes they can misfold. This misfolding causes the proteins to get sticky, and that can promote clumping, or aggregation, which is the hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.
Neurodegenerative diseases: The case of the sticky protein
As interdisciplinary sleuths, medical researchers recently put together clues to solve the case of the sticky protein. This new tool opens more possibilities for studying neurodegenerative diseases like ALS, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.www.sciencedaily.com
I just wanted to help to protect them from diseases, but they don't want to understand. Then they use glued proteins. Anyone else shouldn't use something like this if their health is important to them. Below 1% dimer anything else is always greater risk.
I remember @Liska stating that pharma tolerance is up to 4%
Since our community does not have access to the testing method by which that was determined but we do know that theirs is (required to be) outdated due to a backwards compatibility rule vs the one Janoshik uses (as he does not suffer that limitation) aand that treshold is for specific patients requiring HGH aaaand for dosage protocols far more narrow than the scope used in/for bodybuilding... I don't see how it's relevant to our community.
Actually really depends on the study and how you interpret them. There is growing evidence and belief it is actually life prolonging as it beneficially aids so many systems, including things like mitigating overall body inflammation and improving the immune system.
That’s not from anti-aging clinics. There are serious believers that you are the incorrect one (as you’re largely citing mice studies, like that small live longer). You can absolutely have you opinion, but don’t play it off as if only someone trying to sell you something believes these things. There has also been little evidence that gh fuels cancer, and some evidence it reduces chances. It’s all about how you look at the relatively sparse data.
There is a lot of assumption in here without much evidence to your claims. Longevity people do not always attempt to lower igf-1 and there are negatives associated with that as well. I get how you feel and understand it’s the current medical feeling on the subject at large, but I do think there are voices (that aren’t selling anything) saying that there are indeed longterm positive health outcomes from it and attempting to create studies to show so. These studies tend to suffer from poor sample size due to the nature of testing these things.
Absolutely, but it’s the best we’ve got due to ethical limitations of running studies. I’ve only seen a few micro studies in healthy adults.
Naturally.
Could you post the meta study you are referencing as i would like to read it.
The trt mortality studies? There are a few now.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I think when it comes to anti-aging it pretty much comes down to actually living longer and maybe amount of illness along the way. Performance etc would depend on what each person is interested in and would be difficult to impossible to track.Athletic people and couch potatoes have different standards they would prefer.
