Kinikuman
Well-known Member
It makes very good sense. I and many others here cannot thank you enough.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Dr Jims Hplc/ms Data
- Thread starter Dr JIM
- Start date
It makes very good sense. I and many others here cannot thank you enough.
Most recent up date, the results are due in by the END OF NEXT WEEK.
I'm going to add a few more samples to that which the lab is currently working on,
in hopes they will also be completed with this batch.
I'm going to add a few more samples to that which the lab is currently working on,
in hopes they will also be completed with this batch.
Guys PLEASE DON'T PM me asking when they will be released bc I will review them ALL before anything is posted and that takes about two days depending upon what else I've got going on, such as WORK,
!
Kinikuman
Well-known Member
Guys PLEASE DON'T PM me asking when they will be released bc I will review them ALL before anything is posted and that takes about two days depending upon what else I've got going on, such as WORK,
Duly noted. We will all be patiently waiting.
Well the data has indeed arrived all SIXTY THREE pages!
That's 63 pages of data for a mere ELEVEN samples. And people wonder why I've questioned the legitimacy of UGL, such as Naps that posts 0NE or perhaps TWO pages of data for a single sample.
Review the prior HPLCs I've posted they average THREE pages of results per sample and that's wo any MS being conducted.
I've BRIEFLY reviewed the results and little has changed, the qualitative (wrong AAS or no AAS) or quantitative (concentration) analyses for the overwhelming majority of UGL are grossly inaccurate, when compared to product labeling.
I hope the involved UGL will stick around Meso to explain the BULLSHIT they are still selling, right Sir Athlete. So much for your body "knowing how an overdosed AAS FEELS".
What a crock of shit you are, get lost loser!
That's 63 pages of data for a mere ELEVEN samples. And people wonder why I've questioned the legitimacy of UGL, such as Naps that posts 0NE or perhaps TWO pages of data for a single sample.
Review the prior HPLCs I've posted they average THREE pages of results per sample and that's wo any MS being conducted.
I've BRIEFLY reviewed the results and little has changed, the qualitative (wrong AAS or no AAS) or quantitative (concentration) analyses for the overwhelming majority of UGL are grossly inaccurate, when compared to product labeling.
I hope the involved UGL will stick around Meso to explain the BULLSHIT they are still selling, right Sir Athlete. So much for your body "knowing how an overdosed AAS FEELS".
What a crock of shit you are, get lost loser!
Last edited:
Volley_Fire
New Member
I look forward to seeing the results. Thanks in advance.
That makes two of us, but the fact is this chemist has a tendency to be obsessive when "his data" is involved and that means A LOT of info for me to review to determine what portions will be most helpful for Meso members. AND to call the "bluff" many UGLs have posted about their AAS quality!
Obviously unloading 63 pages of "results" onto this thread that the chemist and myself (I hope) understands, could quite likely complicate and confuse matters with respect to UGL AAS sales.
The point, it's going to take me a few days to compile the most germane sample assays to post on Meso, maintaining a considerable portion as a computer file should directed questions arise.
But I'll get it done by weeks end for sure, by golly!
Obviously unloading 63 pages of "results" onto this thread that the chemist and myself (I hope) understands, could quite likely complicate and confuse matters with respect to UGL AAS sales.
The point, it's going to take me a few days to compile the most germane sample assays to post on Meso, maintaining a considerable portion as a computer file should directed questions arise.
But I'll get it done by weeks end for sure, by golly!
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
Thanks Dr. Jim , can't wait to see the results to think I'll be able to account for what I've been injecting into my ass for the last 3weeks and decide on a course action based on science. Oh and I can't wait to see evidence of this "overdosed" gear naps puts out because we all know that the ifbb "pro" @Athlete127 knows his body so it's got to be true, right?
Athlete127
New Member
Lol.
daledd
New Member
Thanks Dr.Jim I havent said it yet, but I really appreciate the work you put unto this. Looking forward to seeing the report.
"Obviously unloading 63 pages of "results" onto this thread that the chemist and myself (I hope) understands, could quite likely complicate and confuse matters with respect to UGL AAS sales".
^^^Just hit on all the important aspects of the tests Dr.Jim , most of the technical jargons goes over us "mere mortals" heads .....thanks for everything
^^^Just hit on all the important aspects of the tests Dr.Jim , most of the technical jargons goes over us "mere mortals" heads .....thanks for everything
"Obviously unloading 63 pages of "results" onto this thread that the chemist and myself (I hope) understands, could quite likely complicate and confuse matters with respect to UGL AAS sales".
^^^Just hit on all the important aspects of the tests Dr.Jim , most of the technical jargons goes over us "mere mortals" heads .....thanks for everything
Of course that's what I'm trying to accomplish but some have a broader depth of understanding than others.
Ever asked a first year medical student what they "learned" after attending a lecture designed for 3rd year EM residents?
Much to Millard's credit Meso has become a potpourri of forum "members" whose interests are as broad as the threads posted.
Now all that is fine and dandy, but then again Meso also has it's fair share of "evil doers", whose only interest, IMO, is the pursuit of the almighty dollar and unfortunately many UGLs are designed with that purpose in mind, money making machines!
To that end, when greedy people of that ilk are wanting to find fault with you or your commentary they WILL uncover reasons to criticize one's motives.
For example if I post say 11 pages one for each sample then I'm accused of "withholding potentially exculpatory evidence" yet if I include no less than 3 pages per sample, why then I'm overwhelming them with "useless data" in an effort to support "my position", even though I HAVEN'T ONE.
I may be accused of being condescending in an effort to belittle others by "talking over" their level of understanding or if I speak in terms that are to simplistic the accusation morphs into, that F..ing Jim doesn't know what he talking about.
So yea it's hard being me,
Last edited:
Gramps
New Member
Hard being you? Be like me - stop giving a shit what anyone thinks and do what ever it is you do. Works for me and it'll work for you. Keep doing what you do! Some of us appreciate it and you'll never please all. My vote is for the shorthand version of any tests. Anyone wanting the longer version can send their gear to the walmart test facility.
Goodness I was joking ^^^^^ !
Voltrader
New Member
Marcus
New Member
Hahaha
That video is symbolic of the problem many "contemporary physicians" have. They only feel confident practicing medicine, limiting themselves to what they know rather than what they can learn!
Regs
jim
MoriorInvictus
New Member
^^^Just hit on all the important aspects of the tests Dr.Jim said:
Voltrader
New Member
I just thought it was funny because of the conspiracy that surrounds Dr. Jim. You know I stand with you any day.
Similar threads
