Endura Biosciences (Peptides & Steroids)

[Droc]

Control your e2 and gyno from prolactin is a non issue

I've had it all on point and still have issues. There are countless professional bodybuilders that have quit nandrolone for the same reason. It's not that special of a drug to deal with side effects. Never had any issues on tren. I've crashed my estrogen on npp trying to avoid it which sucks.

 

[Obeast88]

Wow that was fast delivery I just got my package less than 10days time to start testing after I finished my sigma oils I’ll get tested in 10 days then I might which up afterwards and use Endura and get tested in 3-4 weeks after that and post results

So your the test? Hahaha lmao dude that has got to be the dumbest shit I’ve ever read. That’s exactly the opposite of harm reduction. Test the products in a lab before you inject in your body. You never know what you could be injected into your body and how you will react to it. Everyone these days takes this shit way too lightly like a bunch of eager little kids. Inches prices always get someone to buy instead of using reliable sources that have been vetted then after this source has been tested vigorously and consistently, you buy and test on yourself. Just be careful

 

[jay510]

So your the test? Hahaha lmao dude that has got to be the dumbest shit I’ve ever read. That’s exactly the opposite of harm reduction. Test the products in a lab before you inject in your body. You never know what you could be injected into your body and how you will react to it. Everyone these days takes this shit way too lightly like a bunch of eager little kids. Inches prices always get someone to buy instead of using reliable sources that have been vetted then after this source has been tested vigorously and consistently, you buy and test on yourself. Just be careful

Yeah you right!! I guess I’ll hold on to them I was about to be the guinea pig for everyone they was my last buy for oils anyway cause now I’m home brewing my own gear after I get low on Qsc and Sigma oils I have so much

 

[AlexDavis43]

I think all factories claim GMP for the most part, no?

Absolutely not. You can't just claim to be doing good manufacturing practices and therefore are GMP certified. It's a lengthy and expensive process. Many companies need to hire specialists which isn't cheap.

You'd of course expect it for large manufacturers but not homebrewers or UGL etc.

 

[carbon adams]

Absolutely not. You can't just claim to be doing good manufacturing practices and therefore are GMP certified. It's a lengthy and expensive process. Many companies need to hire specialists which isn't cheap.

You'd of course expect it for large manufacturers but not homebrewers or UGL etc.

My boy !! Thanks for the clarification

Has there been any source on meso, past or present who has claimed GMP and also provided a certificate that was able to be verified?

Has anyone actually seen one of these certificates that turned out to be legit ?

 

[readalot]

My boy !! Thanks for the clarification

Has there been any source on meso, past or present who has claimed GMP and also provided a certificate that was able to be verified?

Has anyone actually seen one of these certificates that turned out to be legit ?

The crux here is that the vendor does the internal testing compliant with USP standards as part of GMP. The customer can then confirm some/most of that data with 3rd party testing. The only missing piece left for 3rd party testing (Jano) is residual solvents. Still TBD.

 

[Endura Biosciences]

What's your shipping cost to the US

Generally speaking, it costs $35 for less than 0.5kg and $45 for less than 1kg.

 

[Endura Biosciences]

So 20% off listed prices is it?

Yes

 

[Endura Biosciences]

Customer service is great so far with you guys. Answers emails fast always. Waiting on my sample order to arrive now .

Thank you for your support, I believe you will be satisfied after receiving it!

 

[readalot]

This statement is nonsensical. You can't have a GMP process by farming out testing after product released. You wait until your products test out with basic Jano screen before releasing to customers?

Details on your analytical chem lab?

What internal testing do you perform on your raw powders/products?

Surely with your GMP setup you do QA/QC at your site.

Tell us more about your GMP standards. You know part of that is internal testing and control specs.

CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21

CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21

====
Sec. 211.165 Testing and release for distribution.
(a) For each batch of drug product, there shall be appropriate laboratory determination of satisfactory conformance to final specifications for the drug product, including the identity and strength of each active ingredient, prior to release. Where sterility and/or pyrogen testing are conducted on specific batches of shortlived radiopharmaceuticals, such batches may be released prior to completion of sterility and/or pyrogen testing, provided such testing is completed as soon as possible.

(b) There shall be appropriate laboratory testing, as necessary, of each batch of drug product required to be free of objectionable microorganisms.

(c) Any sampling and testing plans shall be described in written procedures that shall include the method of sampling and the number of units per batch to be tested; such written procedure shall be followed.

(d) Acceptance criteria for the sampling and testing conducted by the quality control unit shall be adequate to assure that batches of drug products meet each appropriate specification and appropriate statistical quality control criteria as a condition for their approval and release. The statistical quality control criteria shall include appropriate acceptance levels and/or appropriate rejection levels.

(e) The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of test methods employed by the firm shall be established and documented. Such validation and documentation may be accomplished in accordance with § 211.194(a)(2).

(f) Drug products failing to meet established standards or specifications and any other relevant quality control criteria shall be rejected. Reprocessing may be performed. Prior to acceptance and use, reprocessed material must meet appropriate standards, specifications, and any other relevant criteria.

ETA on response @Endura Biosciences
?

Don't want to assume you are just planning to ignore and try to go back to business as usual. That would be a good tell on your business model. So I am optimistic you will be receptive and responsive.

 

[Ateam2023]

Will we have two tiers of harm reduction members ?

Top shelf, gold platter, limited edition harm reduction member- Does tests without ever caring or accepting reimbursement.


Boot licker harm reduction member - only does it if they get full reimbursement




Likewise

who gives full reimbursement for testing?lol, I just test products for peace of mind of what im using and maybe to help someone else who has the same product and needs to know "what iu/mg" are they using so in the end it helps everyone,,,

 

[PsychedUp]

who gives full reimbursement for testing?lol, I just test products for peace of mind of what im using and maybe to help someone else who has the same product and needs to know "what iu/mg" are they using so in the end it helps everyone,,,

Testing products out of your own product without expecting reimbursement is very generous, and everyone should be grateful to members who do that on their own dime. So thanks for that bro.

But I do see offering full reimbursement for 3rd party testing to be more a sign of good faith. A source who actively encourages 3rd party testing by full reimbursement (and extra in some cases) really shows confidence in their product and respect for the community IMO.

 

[readalot]

who gives full reimbursement for testing?

Correct me if wrong but I see many offers for full reimbursement obviously with some caps per certain amount of time. Huge variability across vendors.

 

[Ateam2023]

Correct me if wrong but I see many offers for full reimbursement obviously with some caps per certain amount of time. Huge variability across vendors.

i get testing credit for bloodwork etc, i just never expected anything for testing a product for sake of harm reduction for everyone interested, maybe i'm missing out, ORrr using the wrong vendors,,,,, lol

 

[readalot]

just never expected anything for testing

Completely understood.

Thanks for your thoughts.

 

[strangegenericguy]

Can i share my opinion? I think a lot of chinese suppliers are resellers so it is hard to get photos from the Lab and everything, we should be happy with the testing that they do

Completely understood.

Thanks for your thoughts.

 

[readalot]

i get testing credit for bloodwork etc, i just never expected anything for testing a product for sake of harm reduction for everyone interested, maybe i'm missing out, ORrr using the wrong vendors,,,,, lol

Just a couple of samples I pulled from domestic vendors. I really don't understand the conflict of interest unless the person sending in the test is shilling / scamming with the source. Blind testing an excellent check to the testing provided by vendor. For a vendor claiming "GMP", there should have copious date from every batch.

====
Store Credit for posting Verifiable HPLC Tests:

$320 - FIRST USER SUBMITTED TESTED SAMPLE FROM SPECIFIC BATCH (Cost of Testing + $200)
$170 - ALL SUBSEQUENT TESTS FOR A PREVIOUSLY TESTED BATCH (Cost of Testing + $50)
====

*Blind Testing*
$200 store credit per compound
(Store credit applied to regular price items only)
=====

@strangegenericguy: what tests has this source shared for the AAS raws/finished products?

 

[strangegenericguy]

Just a couple of samples I pulled from domestic vendors. I really don't understand the conflict of interest unless the person sending in the test is shilling / scamming with the source. Blind testing an excellent check to the testing provided by vendor. For a vendor claiming "GMP", there should have copious date from every batch.

====
Store Credit for posting Verifiable HPLC Tests:

$320 - FIRST USER SUBMITTED TESTED SAMPLE FROM SPECIFIC BATCH (Cost of Testing + $200)
$170 - ALL SUBSEQUENT TESTS FOR A PREVIOUSLY TESTED BATCH (Cost of Testing + $50)
====

*Blind Testing*
$200 store credit per compound
(Store credit applied to regular price items only)
=====

@strangegenericguy: what tests has this source shared for the AAS raws/finished products?

He shared only peptides right

 

[readalot]

He shared only peptides right

"GMP" manufacturer with not one test result on the AAS products. Make sense to you?

 

[strangegenericguy]

"GMP" manufacturer with not one test result on the AAS products. Make sense to you?

To be honest? If the peptide quality Is good i can buy them, i take the oils from another most famous seller