I assume a rhetorical question. But let me answer. No source was coerced. But evidently there are some here that care quite a bit about engaging with sources in ways they don't find suitable. A protected class. Strange for MESO. Or is it?
Look, it was not like that.
I personally do not mind you asking a source if they care to donate.
At the end if the day, your message there was seen by other people, too.
But Spaceman's point was this:
I just don't like solicitors. It has nothing to do with the fact checking.
People should donate cause they want to. Not out of pressure.
Kind of like "keeping score"
It was not about protecting or not bothering sources.
It is not his way/style of doing things, especially since this donation idea was his spiel with anyone who had just turned up on the forum to ask where to get gear from.
So he was trying to make a point with it, I suppose, rather than telling them to pay $10 to have access (I would think the owner ain't particularly happy about it, lol).
You did it your way and more money was raised than it would otherwise have been.
Great result.
You guys all did well, someone with a good idea, a receptive audience and everyone contributing in their own way.
You should all be happy about this instead of this waste of energy and aggro.
It was all just a means to an end and it did not cause any annoyance to vendors or other members.
Disagree with the method, acknowledge the result, you did something worthwhile TOGETHER.