MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

FWIW....Bioniche

SeaVee

SeaVee

New Member
ran bloods at 6 weeks, 36 hours after pin. 600mg split 2x, standard HCG protocol. TT WAS.....2,570. Legit Test E according to Bioniche guy who stopped by.

Gonna double up and add in some MFL Test E (I know but it's all I gots) to try and salvage this crap cycle. Think I might just stay natty after this. Doesn't seem worth it any more. Could be spending my money on other things.
 
SeaVee said:
ran bloods at 6 weeks, 36 hours after pin. 600mg split 2x, standard HCG protocol. TT WAS.....2,570. Legit Test E according to Bioniche guy who stopped by.

Gonna double up and add in some MFL Test E (I know but it's all I gots) to try and salvage this crap cycle. Think I might just stay natty after this. Doesn't seem worth it any more. Could be spending my money on other things.
Click to expand...

so 4.2x? you do realize like 4 post down is a member who posted 4x blood levels on pharmaceutical watson cyp right
 
I've had the worst luck. I first bought PEP then he went to shit a couple weeks later. Then same deal with MFL, then Astro. If you ever want to take a lab down, tell me to buy from them. They'll be shit soon after. All I want is a good cycle. FML
 
I_know_nothing said:
Are you saying @dmt31 's watson is bunk?
Click to expand...

No, I'm saying you just changed your story!! Your using that test as your new weapon instead of acknowledging most of the data doesn't agree that that is what the number should be.. You've agreed to this recently and now you're backtracking to try and use it to your advantage..

It's quite obvious to everyone you have an agenda. 95% of your posts over the past several months have been you arguing about the 10x rule. That's all you're here for, on a mission..... :rolleyes:

No one is buying your bullshit, "brah"..
 
johnnyBALLZ said:
No, I'm saying you just changed your story!! Your using that test as your new weapon instead of acknowledging most of the data doesn't agree that that is what the number should be.. You've agreed to this recently and now you're backtracking to try and use it to your advantage..

It's quite obvious to everyone you have an agenda. 95% of your posts over the past several months have been you arguing about the 10x rule. That's all you're here for, on a mission..... :rolleyes:

No one is buying your bullshit, liar..
Click to expand...

I'm not changing my story at all, all I did was simply stat a fact. Look at my post again, I said did you realize someone on watson got 4x levels.

Admittedly I am baffled as well.how do we explain this? Do we just call it freak incident? How do you rectify dmt's results with the 10x rule?

And furthermore, if a new member posted that result I know screams of bunk watson would be heard but since a WKM posted it, it's not questioned. And that's what is wrong with the status system.
 
I_know_nothing said:
I'm not changing my story at all, all I did was simply stat a fact. Look at my post again, I said did you realize someone on watson got 4x levels.

Admittedly I am baffled as well.how do we explain this? Do we just call it freak incident? How do you rectify dmt's results with the 10x rule?

And furthermore, if a new member posted that result I know screams of bunk watson would be heard but since a WKM posted it, it's not questioned. And that's what is wrong with the status system.
Click to expand...

Yea, you said "do you realize someone on Watson cyp got 4x levels" in reponse to people saying the OP's levels are low for the dose!! That's how anyone would interpret this:

I_know_nothing said:
so 4.2x? you do realize like 4 post down is a member who posted 4x blood levels on pharmaceutical watson cyp right
Click to expand...

as a response to the previous posts.. You tried to say/implied "Watson cyp isn't is testing on par with this as well"!! You're trying to backtrack again... Tisk, tisk..

And the status bullshit you're posting is your attempt to try and distract from my point.. I'm not going back and forth with you right now.. You just say whatever bullshit is about to come out of your mouth and we'll be done for the night.. ;)
 
johnnyBALLZ said:
Yea, you said "do you realize someone on Watson cyp got 4x levels" in reponse to people saying the OP's levels are low for the dose!! That's how anyone would interpret this:



as a response to the previous posts.. You tried to say/implied "Watson cyp isn't is testing on par with this as well"!! You're trying to backtrack again... Tisk, tisk..

And the status bullshit you're posting is your attempt to try and distract from my point.. I'm not going back and forth with you right now.. You just say whatever bullshit is about to come out of your mouth and we'll be done for the night.. ;)
Click to expand...

Now who's twisting words?

You're the one who's trying to distract from my point:

Explain dmt's 4x blood TT results from watson cup.
 
I_know_nothing said:
Now who's twisting words?

You're the one who's trying to distract from my point:

Explain dmt's 4x blood TT results from watson cup.
Click to expand...

You're an annoying little shit.. MY fucking point is YOU are trying to say that these results should be good when in the past YOUVE agreed 7x seems to be the norm based on the data. You claim to only care about the data but when it's not to you're favor you ignore it..

I don't care what your point is, I jumped in and called YOU out. Could give two fucks what your slick tongue can spin this into.

I don't care about dmnt's results since they certainly seem abnormal and don't agree with the majority of the data(which you used to care about).. Why didn't you post up when someone posted 10k the other day on 1g/week?? Well, because it didn't agree with the bullshit argument you've been having here for months, that's why!! Can see right through you, man.. Right freaking through you..

I'm gonna try not to let you drag me back in tonight.. Wish me luck guys!! :)
 
Status, wah wah, status, boo hoo, status, not fair, not fair.

This whole status thing is tired and beat to death and quite simply, irrelevant to the thinking member who has a brain and thinks for themselves, OR who had been around forums of ANY KIND in the past.

I could see worrying about status back in 2001 as you roamed around the AOL chat boards, checking your Hotmail account. But anyone who doesn't realize how meaningless the status of the member making a post is by now, is the type of person who can't be saved from themselves anyways. If you are the kind of person who says "Bickel is an Awesome Member, so therefore his opinion on a source is GOLDEN", well, you are going to have to learn the hard way anyways.

I see just as many WKM and Awesome Members getting challenged here as Junior members. Just ask Manwhore or OGH or even DMT himself.
 
johnnyBALLZ said:
You're an annoying little shit.. MY fucking point is YOU are trying to say that these results should be good when in the past YOUVE agreed 7x seems to be the norm based on the data. You claim to only care about the data but when it's not to you're favor you ignore it..

I don't care what your point is, I jumped in and called YOU out. Could give two fucks what your slick tongue can spin this into.

I don't care about dmnt's results since they certainly seem abnormal and don't agree with the majority of the data(which you used to care about).. Why didn't you post up when someone posted 10k the other day on 1g/week?? Well, because it didn't agree with the bullshit argument you've been having here for months, that's why!! Can see right through you, man.. Right freaking through you..

I'm gonna try not to let you drag me back in tonight.. Wish me luck guys!! :)
Click to expand...

Because im not here to add to the 10x circle jerk. I'm here to provide counter arguments. Does dmt's results not flip shit sideways a little? How are we suppose to know who's a "bad responder" to Tt levels?

I'm absolutely open to 10x levels but when I see 4x on watson that makes me think it's not as simple as 10x

On the contrary you and Jim are the ones who ignore the data. You point to 10x on that guy a few days ago but then jackmeoff posts 5-6x on compounding pharmacy and all you do is discredit him.

You can see that by basing your "proof" and "evidence" on stuff you pick and choose and reverting to anger, frustrating, and calling people challenging you "annoying shits" - all you do is weaken the ground you're standing on.
 
Have to chime in and say i agree with that for sure Bickel. No one is immune to challenges here and i think that is the way it should be. That is part of critical thinking and debate.
 
I think Jackmeoff's credibility is questioned in general. If he posted something about global warming or why he thinks sucking dick extends the human lifespan it would be received about the same i think.
 
I_know_nothing said:
Because im not here to add to the 10x circle jerk. I'm here to provide counter arguments. Does dmt's results not flip shit sideways a little? How are we suppose to know who's a "bad responder" to Tt levels?

I'm absolutely open to 10x levels but when I see 4x on watson that makes me think it's not as simple as 10x

On the contrary you and Jim are the ones who ignore the data. You point to 10x on that guy a few days ago but then jackmeoff posts 5-6x on compounding pharmacy and all you do is discredit him.

You can see that by basing your "proof" and "evidence" on stuff you pick and choose and reverting to anger, frustrating, and calling people challenging you "annoying shits" - all you do is weaken the ground you're standing on.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

666bym
Test P Protocol - Half life and peak
Replies
18
Views
867
rexy
rexy
LiftnLift68
Primo in place of AI and HCG for crashing
Replies
16
Views
1K
chaz57
C
Burntoutn3rd
My f*** cancer cycle.
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
trt15
trt15
T
My TRT/fat loss log
2 3 4
Replies
75
Views
3K
twreck555
T
M
First Bulk in 10 Years
2
Replies
25
Views
1K
4Drago
4Drago

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top