Yep and you're STILL living in THAT past.
GET some help fella!
GET some help fella!
Lol But he claims he not an "outsiders" he's an OG SMHFirst I'm some Meso "mascot" next I'm proclaiming to be "bright", really lets see you cite ANY!
Damn dude how long have you been haunted by such an overt "inferiority complex".
It's clear you are suffering from some pretty serious and potentially disabling mental issues.
GET SOME HELP!
informing young guys who have no idea what they're doing with gear
Sorry for this nonsense last night. I was drinking, some heavy personal stuff going on right now. My apologies for that.
lol, but dead on!You are too kind heady. Mr Masse if you would like to have these tests done your self please do so. If you are one of the spectators who is benefiting from several members hard work and precious time please kindly shut the fuck up. Have some well deserved respect for the people whose doing this.
The problem is too much data is being posted in a single thread and it's quickly getting buried.
A better solution is for you to forward the reports to Mands and let him start a new thread for each sample report that clearly identifies the manufacturer in the header.
This business of posting "report 12" or "report 17" with no mention of the sample's manufacturer until Mands identifies it, maybe 3 pages later, is way too confusing and it makes it too hard to locate later. A new thread for each sample report that clearly identifies the manufacturer in the header will make searching infinitely easier and it will go a long way toward eliminating all this unnecessary confusion.
With deference Millard, as we discussed CBSs idea would spread bt 50-100 samples over 50-100 threads and is just not workable as a means of evidence consolidation.
Unfortunately, you simply can't stop people from posting and discussing the topic on an open thread. You know it won't work when there are almost as many people disrupting the thread with posts asking other members not to disrupt the thread lol.
^^^ It's still not too late to follow @CensoredBoardsSuck 's suggestion. Even if 50-100 threads are required, the reports/evidence will never get buried and will easily be indexed by the name of manufacturer. The reports/data will ALWAYS be at the top of the relevant thread.
Keep in mind, that threads with the manufacturer and product in the thread title are most easily accessible by forum searches and, perhaps even more importantly, more readily indexed by Google.
I would like to invite @Dr JIM and @mands to share/post/discuss analytical data on the AnabolicLab forum. The invitation is also extended to @muscle96ss and @jano. The forum exists solely for that purpose.