"Generic" GH ASSAYS

Isn't this a thread for GH testing? WTF? If there is any member who doesn't like it on Meso, or what they read with respect to this testing, then find one you trust. No disrespect to anyone, but Meso doesn't hand feed. If you don't like @Dr JIM , or @mands, that's fine. Go to a thread you have people you do like. This is free and until anyone does anything better and proves it, why bitch? I haven't read one post to back up anyone's bitching yet. If anyone doesn't do their own research to weigh the rights and wrongs, shame on them. I'm sure even the people who support this thread still research outside here. I'm all about helping members, but to bitch because you feel it's wrong, or don't like a member, you contribute nothing. JMHO

@Dr JIM and @mands continue on gentleman.
 
First I'm some Meso "mascot" next I'm proclaiming to be "bright", really lets see you cite ANY!

Damn dude how long have you been haunted by such an overt "inferiority complex".

It's clear you are suffering from some pretty serious and potentially disabling mental issues.

GET SOME HELP!
 
MESO is a hilarious forum. Instead of informing young guys who have no idea what they're doing with gear you guys are biting each other all the time...WOW!!! and then if OP asks a question in 1 day has to go through at least 10 pages of pure B.S. !!
 
First I'm some Meso "mascot" next I'm proclaiming to be "bright", really lets see you cite ANY!

Damn dude how long have you been haunted by such an overt "inferiority complex".

It's clear you are suffering from some pretty serious and potentially disabling mental issues.

GET SOME HELP!
Lol But he claims he not an "outsiders" he's an OG :rolleyes: SMH

Guess no one cared enough to chime in huh GI BOY ;) haha

Higher dosage of GH EOD over lower dose ED for size ?
 
informing young guys who have no idea what they're doing with gear
!

I suppose it a novel concept for NOOBs who refuse to listen to reason, but "young guys who have no idea what they are doing with gear" SHOULDNT BE RUNNING AAS, in the first place!

Any suggestion to the contrary is analogous to placing someone behind the wheel of car before they have learned to drive.

Keep reading as you'll soon discover much of the "BS" you find so distracting has its origins in NOOBS "wanting" to be spoon fed information that is readily available on the net.
 
Last edited:
I know I have very little to contribute here as I am learning and cross referencing as I go. I thought that I could add this to break up the nonsense. Sorry for adding mud to the water! View attachment 51323

Edit, yes that is a selfie
Sorry for this nonsense last night. I was drinking, some heavy personal stuff going on right now. My apologies for that.
 
Like VC out of a rice paddy.
bdbf88e0995f8899c56379f9ec7ba01e.jpg
 
Please can someone then refresh the GH testing chart? I mean when it's known what number is what brand..?
Is it possible to get the brand names of the numbers today?
 
You are too kind heady. Mr Masse if you would like to have these tests done your self please do so. If you are one of the spectators who is benefiting from several members hard work and precious time please kindly shut the fuck up. Have some well deserved respect for the people whose doing this.
 
You are too kind heady. Mr Masse if you would like to have these tests done your self please do so. If you are one of the spectators who is benefiting from several members hard work and precious time please kindly shut the fuck up. Have some well deserved respect for the people whose doing this.
lol, but dead on!
 
Unfortunately, you simply can't stop people from posting and discussing the topic on an open thread. You know it won't work when there are almost as many people disrupting the thread with posts asking other members not to disrupt the thread lol.

The problem is too much data is being posted in a single thread and it's quickly getting buried.

A better solution is for you to forward the reports to Mands and let him start a new thread for each sample report that clearly identifies the manufacturer in the header.

This business of posting "report 12" or "report 17" with no mention of the sample's manufacturer until Mands identifies it, maybe 3 pages later, is way too confusing and it makes it too hard to locate later. A new thread for each sample report that clearly identifies the manufacturer in the header will make searching infinitely easier and it will go a long way toward eliminating all this unnecessary confusion.

With deference Millard, as we discussed CBSs idea would spread bt 50-100 samples over 50-100 threads and is just not workable as a means of evidence consolidation.

^^^ It's still not too late to follow @CensoredBoardsSuck 's suggestion. Even if 50-100 threads are required, the reports/evidence will never get buried and will easily be indexed by the name of manufacturer. The reports/data will ALWAYS be at the top of the relevant thread.

Keep in mind, that threads with the manufacturer and product in the thread title are most easily accessible by forum searches and, perhaps even more importantly, more readily indexed by Google.

I would like to invite @Dr JIM and @mands to share/post/discuss analytical data on the AnabolicLab forum. The invitation is also extended to @muscle96ss and @jano. The forum exists solely for that purpose.
 
Unfortunately, you simply can't stop people from posting and discussing the topic on an open thread. You know it won't work when there are almost as many people disrupting the thread with posts asking other members not to disrupt the thread lol.





^^^ It's still not too late to follow @CensoredBoardsSuck 's suggestion. Even if 50-100 threads are required, the reports/evidence will never get buried and will easily be indexed by the name of manufacturer. The reports/data will ALWAYS be at the top of the relevant thread.

Keep in mind, that threads with the manufacturer and product in the thread title are most easily accessible by forum searches and, perhaps even more importantly, more readily indexed by Google.

I would like to invite @Dr JIM and @mands to share/post/discuss analytical data on the AnabolicLab forum. The invitation is also extended to @muscle96ss and @jano. The forum exists solely for that purpose.

Thanks but in the absence of a well qualified expert in the field of analytical testing to "moderate" such a discussion, the outcome would be a I says, he says, she says, biased pissing contest. But then again if Meso had such an expert, should/would there be a need for such a discussion?

NIMO bc rest assured any expert in the field of analytical chemistry would request MORE DATA from Jano and MH-96 to better evaluate the HPLCs cited on PM, something they have refused to do.

FYI, the remaining results will be posted at the TOP of a NEW thread.
 
Last edited:
Thank you Mr. Baker.

Could you please point me to the forum you had mentioned as I don't really know my way.
Is it this one: AnabolicLab Forum ?

I agree with Mr. JIM here - regarding the need for a 3rd party. Maybe a possibility of bringing an unbiased 3rd party to the talks could be discussed?

Edit, just like JIM: And any expert wouldn't need to see anything else posted from you to see how wrong you are :)

Pee pee and here it comes again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Millard Baker I wholeheartedly support the inclusion of "generic GH assays" as a part of, or separate from, Anabolic Labs to better ensure ALL Meso readers can view the results.

In addition I would have absolutely no problem forwarding ALL THE DATA to an expert qualified in the field of analytical or laboratory chemistry, as doing so can only benefit Meso and its members!

Regs
JIM
 
Last edited:
Back
Top