Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HFCS is pure crack. Worst ingredient ever developed and included in the food industry.So keeping an eye on ingredient labels for HFCS or Fructose would probably be doing them a big favor.
You do understand that geigi are the equivalent of western prostitutes, right? The long term relationships you are referring are nothing but what in plain English would be called a side chick.Successful Japanese businessmen forming long term committed relationships with Geisha is not some relic of centuries ago.
I am away from home base atm.What were you doing up so late, when your dogs bang on your door for walkies, at 5am?
HFCS is pure crack. Worst ingredient ever developed and included in the food industry.
You do understand that geigi are the equivalent of western prostitutes, right? The long term relationships you are referring are nothing but what in plain English would be called a side chick.
You can theoretically call them whatever you want. They are artisans and highly educated ones, can hold their own, but they are still side chicks. They get money for services rendered.No they are not the equivalent. It's far less transactional than that, and when they choose to accept an offer from a man to become her patron, there's a ceremony similar to taking marriage vows which is expected to be a lifetime commitment, and he must provide for all of the expenses of the lifestyle she's accustomed to. They are usually highly talented in an art, and expected to keep up her end in conversations from history, to global politics and business. It's not uncommon for a Geisha to retire and marry her patron if his wife dies. Japan has prostitutes that operate in the "western" sense, but those are not Geisha.
Geisha usually apply for the many years of training required (before ever working) as early teens, and it's a highly respected and revered position in Japan, seen as a high art, and an honorable reflection on their families.
What you've highlighted is a very vague statement. That's like saying fire can burn your house down so you should do all your cooking for the week at one time with a big fire as cooking everyday gives a higher odds of starting a house fire. I'm not buying it.No, micro dosing, or ANY increase in injection frequency is a mistake.
Each sub-q injection starts a chain reaction that puts your immune system on high alert. This greatly increase the chances, and quantity of antidrug antibodies forming as your body seeks to dispose of this infecting invader,
You always want to minimize the development of antidrug antibodies with any protein based treatment. No one moreso than pharma companies, since you won't buy, and the FDA often won't approve, a drug you quickly develop an immunity to. The observed impact by clinicians and researchers of lessened effects for those who've stopped and restarted strongly supports this is what's happening.
View attachment 297757
What you've highlighted is a very vague statement. That's like saying fire can burn your house down so you should do all your cooking for the week at one time with a big fire as cooking everyday gives a higher odds of starting a house fire. I'm not buying it.
HFCS is pure crack. Worst ingredient ever developed and included in the food industry.
I am away from home base atm.
Europe is stricter and the HFCS lobby is non existent. In Murica, that lobby can bring down politicians like a house of cards.Tbf, I don't think it is as prevalent in Europe as it is in the States.
Asians seem to be using it a fair amount too (I have seen it listed in many Japanese things).
I hope it will not become as ubiquitous as it is there.
My take is injection frequency is based on half life. These protocols are designed for the general public and the less injections needed the higher rate of compliance they will get.I understand where you're coming from. I could easily write a novel with every citation backing every assertion I'm making, and then be attacked for that (insulted by idiots name calling more likely), by people who won't even read it. I try to make it accessible. Cut to the essentials, and I'm criticized for not substantiating it sufficiently.
On top of all of that, this is still an emerging area pharmaceutical science, where they (the FDA, pharma researchers) know something is happening, they can measure certain aspects of it, and take action to minimize the harm it causes, but there still uncertainty about the precise mechanism of action. Toss in the added "confounder" that UGL versions of these compounds are a mess, regardless of what a "purity" test demonstrates, and it becomes impossible to say anything with certainty.
Since you were decent enough to not resort to low brow ad hominem attacks, I'd be happy to address specific aspects you take issue with and provide more detailed info.
A 23 year old woman is not a child, and the ones proclaiming outrage should be more concerned with the common western dynamic of their 18 year old daughters hooking up with 40 close in age guys on Tinder, over the course of a year or two, who quickly discard her, than one in their 20s in a relationship where she's respected, cared for, and as a prerequisite, treated very well,
I'm not concerned with the gauzy, superficial values and judgement of small town America. I dropped my rose colored glasses long ago and operate by my own set.
kind of backhanded judgement from men for whom a young, attractive partner wouldn't be an option anyway