CdnGuy
New Member
Read the thread....Where was the hGH shown to be bunk?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read the thread....Where was the hGH shown to be bunk?
Read the thread....
So now we consider underdosed a pass? I call that bunk!I have, I didn't see anywhere that his products came back bunk, they were underdosed but I think there is still more to figure out with the testing.
THE new "Generic" HGH Assay PAGE! AAA testing
I still wouldn't buy his hGH....
So now we consider underdosed a pass? I call that bunk!
Fair enough man but I have a problem with this post. Then you see Dr Jims and Mands testing results....shady shit!I don't know about "pass" but underdosed is the truth so I think we should stick to that.
There was a vial of Seros that was underdosed... There's more to figure out with the hGH testing still IMO.
Even with his underdosed product, it would still be cheaper than pharma I think. That's a whole other discussion though, and I'm still not buying his stuff.
5 clients send this gh to SIMEC (www.simec.ch/en/) for the lab analysis.
then all the labs analysis shows that this gh is pharma grade gh,high purity,high dose.
here the labs analysis:
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-puretropin
www.eroids.com/pics/simec-results-from-the-first-240-kits-before-lables-changed
www.eroids.com/pics/full-labs-analysis-on-godt240-batch-230915
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-10
one lab analysis from SIMEC lab
Fair enough man but I have a problem with this post. Then you see Dr Jims and Mands testing results....shady shit!
I'll be the first to admit understanding GH numbers is still very confusing to me.Just trying to keep things on track... I was genuinely asking if something came back bunk though in case I missed it.
I can't even make sense of that lab report... SIMEC and hGH testing don't seem to go together well at all.
Considering the gear was bunk i can't blame them lol
I'll be the first to admit understanding GH numbers is still very confusing to me.
But I found it veryyyyyyyy suspect how Godt240 had his long winded excuse all ready to go. Once the test results were produced lol
Then tell me in PM and I'll put em on blast. I promise. I give zero fucks so I tell it how it is and don't mind. I like tell the truth. Especially when it hurts. [emoji48]tell me who didn't get the package after the payment.
i still keep all the trackers.
someone still didn't send me the funds, but i don't wanna call it out.
Don't ever ask me to talk fair to you fucktard! You fucked up now make it right! End of story!if u wanna talk about it, just be fair. no need to mislead the other members. its the place to share really things, not place for fighting.
Fair enough man but I have a problem with this post. Then you see Dr Jims and Mands testing results....shady shit!
Lol what scumbag...5 clients sent 5 randomly vials to SIMEC, then came back the result from SIMEC, u can call SIMEC about the result, i don't fake it.
Dr jim took different vials to make the assay.
so whats the problem?
I'm looking back to find the members handle. I don't know it off the top of my head. He had claimed this guy took many and bounced, never sending his products. If I recall it was a sizable amount of money too.Did this actually happen? I missed it...
I remember it was suppose to be 240 iu and it was really 160 iu.
thx bro , u r the manI know @billbixer/@GentleGiant was one of the guys that scammed godt. I already exposed his bullshit and he disappeared. I'm sure that scumbag is here with a different handle
When you have a fixed protocol, and something does not measure up to others that are testing the same variables, what you have there sir, as Canadian as stated several times, to be Bunk.I don't know about "pass" but underdosed is the truth so I think we should stick to that.
There was a vial of Seros that was underdosed... There's more to figure out with the hGH testing still IMO.
Even with his underdosed product, it would still be cheaper than pharma I think. That's a whole other discussion though, and I'm still not buying his stuff.
When you have a fixed protocol, and something does not measure up to others that are testing the same variables, what you have there sir, as Canadian as stated several times, to be Bunk.